| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Clean up the existing export namespace code along the same lines of
commit 33def8498fdd ("treewide: Convert macro and uses of __section(foo)
to __section("foo")") and for the same reason, it is not desired for the
namespace argument to be a macro expansion itself.
Scripted using
git grep -l -e MODULE_IMPORT_NS -e EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS | while read file;
do
awk -i inplace '
/^#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS/ {
gsub(/__stringify\(ns\)/, "ns");
print;
next;
}
/^#define MODULE_IMPORT_NS/ {
gsub(/__stringify\(ns\)/, "ns");
print;
next;
}
/MODULE_IMPORT_NS/ {
$0 = gensub(/MODULE_IMPORT_NS\(([^)]*)\)/, "MODULE_IMPORT_NS(\"\\1\")", "g");
}
/EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS/ {
if ($0 ~ /(EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS[^(]*)\(([^,]+),/) {
if ($0 !~ /(EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS[^(]*)\(([^,]+), ([^)]+)\)/ &&
$0 !~ /(EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS[^(]*)\(\)/ &&
$0 !~ /^my/) {
getline line;
gsub(/[[:space:]]*\\$/, "");
gsub(/[[:space:]]/, "", line);
$0 = $0 " " line;
}
$0 = gensub(/(EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS[^(]*)\(([^,]+), ([^)]+)\)/,
"\\1(\\2, \"\\3\")", "g");
}
}
{ print }' $file;
done
Requested-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/2/#inbox/FMfcgzQXKWgMmjdFwwdsfgxzKpVHWPlc
Acked-by: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The string allocated by kmemdup() in aa_unpack_strdup() is not
freed and cause following memory leaks, free them to fix it.
unreferenced object 0xffffff80c6af8a50 (size 8):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 225, jiffies 4294894407
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
74 65 73 74 69 6e 67 00 testing.
backtrace (crc 5eab668b):
[<0000000001e3714d>] kmemleak_alloc+0x34/0x40
[<000000006e6c7776>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x300/0x3e0
[<000000006870467c>] kmemdup_noprof+0x34/0x60
[<000000001176bb03>] aa_unpack_strdup+0xd0/0x18c
[<000000008ecde918>] policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_with_null_name+0xf8/0x3ec
[<0000000032ef8f77>] kunit_try_run_case+0x13c/0x3ac
[<00000000f3edea23>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x80/0xec
[<00000000adf936cf>] kthread+0x2e8/0x374
[<0000000041bb1628>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffffff80c2a29090 (size 8):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 227, jiffies 4294894409
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
74 65 73 74 69 6e 67 00 testing.
backtrace (crc 5eab668b):
[<0000000001e3714d>] kmemleak_alloc+0x34/0x40
[<000000006e6c7776>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x300/0x3e0
[<000000006870467c>] kmemdup_noprof+0x34/0x60
[<000000001176bb03>] aa_unpack_strdup+0xd0/0x18c
[<0000000046a45c1a>] policy_unpack_test_unpack_strdup_with_name+0xd0/0x3c4
[<0000000032ef8f77>] kunit_try_run_case+0x13c/0x3ac
[<00000000f3edea23>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x80/0xec
[<00000000adf936cf>] kthread+0x2e8/0x374
[<0000000041bb1628>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
policy_unpack_test fails on big endian systems because data byte order
is expected to be little endian but is generated in host byte order.
This results in test failures such as:
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:150
Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
(u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
not ok 3 policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:164
Expected array_size == (u16)16, but
array_size == 4096 (0x1000)
(u16)16 == 16 (0x10)
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1
Add the missing endianness conversions when generating test data.
Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack")
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
|
|
Fix the 'make W=1' warning:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in security/apparmor/apparmor_policy_unpack_test.o
Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
Replace the use of strcpy() in build_aa_ext_struct() in
policy_unpack_test.c with strscpy().
strscpy() is the safer method to use to ensure the buffer does not
overflow. This was found by kernel test robot:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301040348.NbfVsXO0-lkp@intel.com/.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor
Pull apparmor updates from John Johansen:
"Features:
- switch to zstd compression for profile raw data
Cleanups:
- simplify obtaining the newest label on a cred
- remove useless static inline functions
- compute permission conversion on policy unpack
- refactor code to share common permissins
- refactor unpack to group policy backwards compatiblity code
- add __init annotation to aa_{setup/teardown}_dfa_engine()
Bug Fixes:
- fix a memleak in
- multi_transaction_new()
- free_ruleset()
- unpack_profile()
- alloc_ns()
- fix lockdep warning when removing a namespace
- fix regression in stacking due to label flags
- fix loading of child before parent
- fix kernel-doc comments that differ from fns
- fix spelling errors in comments
- store return value of unpack_perms_table() to signed variable"
* tag 'apparmor-pr-2022-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor: (64 commits)
apparmor: Fix uninitialized symbol 'array_size' in policy_unpack_test.c
apparmor: Add __init annotation to aa_{setup/teardown}_dfa_engine()
apparmor: Fix memleak in alloc_ns()
apparmor: Fix memleak issue in unpack_profile()
apparmor: fix a memleak in free_ruleset()
apparmor: Fix spelling of function name in comment block
apparmor: Use pointer to struct aa_label for lbs_cred
AppArmor: Fix kernel-doc
LSM: Fix kernel-doc
AppArmor: Fix kernel-doc
apparmor: Fix loading of child before parent
apparmor: refactor code that alloc null profiles
apparmor: fix obsoleted comments for aa_getprocattr() and audit_resource()
apparmor: remove useless static inline functions
apparmor: Fix unpack_profile() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'
apparmor: fix uninitialize table variable in error in unpack_trans_table
apparmor: store return value of unpack_perms_table() to signed variable
apparmor: Fix kunit test for out of bounds array
apparmor: Fix decompression of rawdata for read back to userspace
apparmor: Fix undefined references to zstd_ symbols
...
|
|
Use macros, VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT and EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT, to allow
static symbols to be conditionally set to be visible during
apparmor_policy_unpack_test, which removes the need to include the testing
file in the implementation file.
Change the namespace of the symbols that are now conditionally visible (by
adding the prefix aa_) to avoid confusion with symbols of the same name.
Allow the test to be built as a module and namespace the module name from
policy_unpack_test to apparmor_policy_unpack_test to improve clarity of
the module name.
Provide an example of how static symbols can be dealt with in testing.
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Make sure array_size is initialized in the kunit test to get rid of
compiler warnings. This will also make sure the following tests fail
consistently if the first test fails.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
The apparmor kunit tests are failing on the out of bounds array check
with the following failure
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:178
Expected unpack_array(puf->e, name, &array_size) == 1, but
unpack_array(puf->e, name, &array_size) == -1
# policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:180
Expected array_size == 0, but
array_size == 64192
not ok 5 - policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_out_of_bounds
This is because unpack_array changed to allow distinguishing between
the array not being present and an error. In the error case the array
size is not set and should not be tested.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <yujie.liu@intel.com>
Fixes: 995a5b64620e ("apparmor: make unpack_array return a trianary value")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
currently unpack_array() does not return an error nor whether the
array is not present. The ability to detect an error or the array
not being present is needed so rework the unpack_array() to return
the needed information.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros
removed, several casts in policy_unpack_test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Salvatore <mike.salvatore@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
|
|
Replace the PTR_EQ NULL checks with the more idiomatic and specific NULL
macros.
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
Add KUnit tests to test AppArmor unpacking of userspace policies.
AppArmor uses a serialized binary format for loading policies. To find
policy format documentation see
Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/apparmor.rst.
In order to write the tests against the policy unpacking code, some
static functions needed to be exposed for testing purposes. One of the
goals of this patch is to establish a pattern for which testing these
kinds of functions should be done in the future.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Salvatore <mike.salvatore@canonical.com>
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
|
