diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcu/srcutree.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 211 |
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 99 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c index 5e2e53464794..d2a694944553 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c @@ -116,8 +116,9 @@ do { \ /* * Initialize SRCU per-CPU data. Note that statically allocated * srcu_struct structures might already have srcu_read_lock() and - * srcu_read_unlock() running against them. So if the is_static parameter - * is set, don't initialize ->srcu_lock_count[] and ->srcu_unlock_count[]. + * srcu_read_unlock() running against them. So if the is_static + * parameter is set, don't initialize ->srcu_ctrs[].srcu_locks and + * ->srcu_ctrs[].srcu_unlocks. */ static void init_srcu_struct_data(struct srcu_struct *ssp) { @@ -128,8 +129,6 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_data(struct srcu_struct *ssp) * Initialize the per-CPU srcu_data array, which feeds into the * leaves of the srcu_node tree. */ - BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(sdp->srcu_lock_count) != - ARRAY_SIZE(sdp->srcu_unlock_count)); for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu); spin_lock_init(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(sdp, lock)); @@ -247,15 +246,16 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct *ssp, bool is_static) ssp->srcu_sup->node = NULL; mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_cb_mutex); mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_mutex); - ssp->srcu_idx = 0; ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq = SRCU_GP_SEQ_INITIAL_VAL; ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_seq = 0; mutex_init(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_mutex); atomic_set(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt, 0); INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ssp->srcu_sup->work, process_srcu); ssp->srcu_sup->sda_is_static = is_static; - if (!is_static) + if (!is_static) { ssp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data); + ssp->srcu_ctrp = &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0]; + } if (!ssp->sda) goto err_free_sup; init_srcu_struct_data(ssp); @@ -429,10 +429,10 @@ static bool srcu_gp_is_expedited(struct srcu_struct *ssp) } /* - * Computes approximate total of the readers' ->srcu_lock_count[] values - * for the rank of per-CPU counters specified by idx, and returns true if - * the caller did the proper barrier (gp), and if the count of the locks - * matches that of the unlocks passed in. + * Computes approximate total of the readers' ->srcu_ctrs[].srcu_locks + * values for the rank of per-CPU counters specified by idx, and returns + * true if the caller did the proper barrier (gp), and if the count of + * the locks matches that of the unlocks passed in. */ static bool srcu_readers_lock_idx(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, bool gp, unsigned long unlocks) { @@ -443,20 +443,20 @@ static bool srcu_readers_lock_idx(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, bool gp, uns for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { struct srcu_data *sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu); - sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[idx]); + sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU)) mask = mask | READ_ONCE(sdp->srcu_reader_flavor); } WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && (mask & (mask - 1)), "Mixed reader flavors for srcu_struct at %ps.\n", ssp); - if (mask & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE && !gp) + if (mask & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_SLOWGP && !gp) return false; return sum == unlocks; } /* - * Returns approximate total of the readers' ->srcu_unlock_count[] values - * for the rank of per-CPU counters specified by idx. + * Returns approximate total of the readers' ->srcu_ctrs[].srcu_unlocks + * values for the rank of per-CPU counters specified by idx. */ static unsigned long srcu_readers_unlock_idx(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, unsigned long *rdm) { @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_readers_unlock_idx(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, u for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { struct srcu_data *sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu); - sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[idx]); + sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_unlocks); mask = mask | READ_ONCE(sdp->srcu_reader_flavor); } WARN_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU) && (mask & (mask - 1)), @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active_idx_check(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) unsigned long unlocks; unlocks = srcu_readers_unlock_idx(ssp, idx, &rdm); - did_gp = !!(rdm & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE); + did_gp = !!(rdm & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_SLOWGP); /* * Make sure that a lock is always counted if the corresponding @@ -509,48 +509,49 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active_idx_check(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) * If the locks are the same as the unlocks, then there must have * been no readers on this index at some point in this function. * But there might be more readers, as a task might have read - * the current ->srcu_idx but not yet have incremented its CPU's - * ->srcu_lock_count[idx] counter. In fact, it is possible + * the current ->srcu_ctrp but not yet have incremented its CPU's + * ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks counter. In fact, it is possible * that most of the tasks have been preempted between fetching - * ->srcu_idx and incrementing ->srcu_lock_count[idx]. And there - * could be almost (ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct task_struct)) tasks - * in a system whose address space was fully populated with memory. - * Call this quantity Nt. + * ->srcu_ctrp and incrementing ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks. And + * there could be almost (ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct task_struct)) + * tasks in a system whose address space was fully populated + * with memory. Call this quantity Nt. * - * So suppose that the updater is preempted at this point in the - * code for a long time. That now-preempted updater has already - * flipped ->srcu_idx (possibly during the preceding grace period), - * done an smp_mb() (again, possibly during the preceding grace - * period), and summed up the ->srcu_unlock_count[idx] counters. - * How many times can a given one of the aforementioned Nt tasks - * increment the old ->srcu_idx value's ->srcu_lock_count[idx] - * counter, in the absence of nesting? + * So suppose that the updater is preempted at this + * point in the code for a long time. That now-preempted + * updater has already flipped ->srcu_ctrp (possibly during + * the preceding grace period), done an smp_mb() (again, + * possibly during the preceding grace period), and summed up + * the ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_unlocks counters. How many times + * can a given one of the aforementioned Nt tasks increment the + * old ->srcu_ctrp value's ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks counter, + * in the absence of nesting? * * It can clearly do so once, given that it has already fetched - * the old value of ->srcu_idx and is just about to use that value - * to index its increment of ->srcu_lock_count[idx]. But as soon as - * it leaves that SRCU read-side critical section, it will increment - * ->srcu_unlock_count[idx], which must follow the updater's above - * read from that same value. Thus, as soon the reading task does - * an smp_mb() and a later fetch from ->srcu_idx, that task will be - * guaranteed to get the new index. Except that the increment of - * ->srcu_unlock_count[idx] in __srcu_read_unlock() is after the - * smp_mb(), and the fetch from ->srcu_idx in __srcu_read_lock() - * is before the smp_mb(). Thus, that task might not see the new - * value of ->srcu_idx until the -second- __srcu_read_lock(), - * which in turn means that this task might well increment - * ->srcu_lock_count[idx] for the old value of ->srcu_idx twice, - * not just once. + * the old value of ->srcu_ctrp and is just about to use that + * value to index its increment of ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks. + * But as soon as it leaves that SRCU read-side critical section, + * it will increment ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_unlocks, which must + * follow the updater's above read from that same value. Thus, + as soon the reading task does an smp_mb() and a later fetch from + * ->srcu_ctrp, that task will be guaranteed to get the new index. + * Except that the increment of ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_unlocks + * in __srcu_read_unlock() is after the smp_mb(), and the fetch + * from ->srcu_ctrp in __srcu_read_lock() is before the smp_mb(). + * Thus, that task might not see the new value of ->srcu_ctrp until + * the -second- __srcu_read_lock(), which in turn means that this + * task might well increment ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks for the + * old value of ->srcu_ctrp twice, not just once. * * However, it is important to note that a given smp_mb() takes * effect not just for the task executing it, but also for any * later task running on that same CPU. * - * That is, there can be almost Nt + Nc further increments of - * ->srcu_lock_count[idx] for the old index, where Nc is the number - * of CPUs. But this is OK because the size of the task_struct - * structure limits the value of Nt and current systems limit Nc - * to a few thousand. + * That is, there can be almost Nt + Nc further increments + * of ->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks for the old index, where Nc + * is the number of CPUs. But this is OK because the size of + * the task_struct structure limits the value of Nt and current + * systems limit Nc to a few thousand. * * OK, but what about nesting? This does impose a limit on * nesting of half of the size of the task_struct structure @@ -581,10 +582,10 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *ssp) for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { struct srcu_data *sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu); - sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[0]); - sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[1]); - sum -= atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[0]); - sum -= atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[1]); + sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[0].srcu_locks); + sum += atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[1].srcu_locks); + sum -= atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[0].srcu_unlocks); + sum -= atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[1].srcu_unlocks); } return sum; } @@ -647,6 +648,7 @@ static unsigned long srcu_get_delay(struct srcu_struct *ssp) unsigned long jbase = SRCU_INTERVAL; struct srcu_usage *sup = ssp->srcu_sup; + lockdep_assert_held(&ACCESS_PRIVATE(ssp->srcu_sup, lock)); if (srcu_gp_is_expedited(ssp)) jbase = 0; if (rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(sup->srcu_gp_seq))) { @@ -674,9 +676,13 @@ static unsigned long srcu_get_delay(struct srcu_struct *ssp) void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp) { int cpu; + unsigned long delay; struct srcu_usage *sup = ssp->srcu_sup; - if (WARN_ON(!srcu_get_delay(ssp))) + spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup); + delay = srcu_get_delay(ssp); + spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup); + if (WARN_ON(!delay)) return; /* Just leak it! */ if (WARN_ON(srcu_readers_active(ssp))) return; /* Just leak it! */ @@ -738,16 +744,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_check_read_flavor); /* * Counts the new reader in the appropriate per-CPU element of the * srcu_struct. - * Returns an index that must be passed to the matching srcu_read_unlock(). + * Returns a guaranteed non-negative index that must be passed to the + * matching __srcu_read_unlock(). */ int __srcu_read_lock(struct srcu_struct *ssp) { - int idx; + struct srcu_ctr __percpu *scp = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_ctrp); - idx = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) & 0x1; - this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_lock_count[idx].counter); + this_cpu_inc(scp->srcu_locks.counter); smp_mb(); /* B */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */ - return idx; + return __srcu_ptr_to_ctr(ssp, scp); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_lock); @@ -759,7 +765,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_lock); void __srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) { smp_mb(); /* C */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */ - this_cpu_inc(ssp->sda->srcu_unlock_count[idx].counter); + this_cpu_inc(__srcu_ctr_to_ptr(ssp, idx)->srcu_unlocks.counter); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock); @@ -772,13 +778,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock); */ int __srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp) { - int idx; - struct srcu_data *sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda); + struct srcu_ctr __percpu *scpp = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_ctrp); + struct srcu_ctr *scp = raw_cpu_ptr(scpp); - idx = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx) & 0x1; - atomic_long_inc(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[idx]); + atomic_long_inc(&scp->srcu_locks); smp_mb__after_atomic(); /* B */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */ - return idx; + return __srcu_ptr_to_ctr(ssp, scpp); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe); @@ -789,10 +794,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_lock_nmisafe); */ void __srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx) { - struct srcu_data *sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda); - smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* C */ /* Avoid leaking the critical section. */ - atomic_long_inc(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[idx]); + atomic_long_inc(&raw_cpu_ptr(__srcu_ctr_to_ptr(ssp, idx))->srcu_unlocks); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__srcu_read_unlock_nmisafe); @@ -1076,7 +1079,6 @@ static void srcu_funnel_gp_start(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_data *sdp, /* If grace period not already in progress, start it. */ if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_seq_done(&sup->srcu_gp_seq, s)) && rcu_seq_state(sup->srcu_gp_seq) == SRCU_STATE_IDLE) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(ULONG_CMP_GE(sup->srcu_gp_seq, sup->srcu_gp_seq_needed)); srcu_gp_start(ssp); // And how can that list_add() in the "else" clause @@ -1096,13 +1098,15 @@ static void srcu_funnel_gp_start(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_data *sdp, /* * Wait until all readers counted by array index idx complete, but * loop an additional time if there is an expedited grace period pending. - * The caller must ensure that ->srcu_idx is not changed while checking. + * The caller must ensure that ->srcu_ctrp is not changed while checking. */ static bool try_check_zero(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, int trycount) { unsigned long curdelay; + spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup); curdelay = !srcu_get_delay(ssp); + spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup); for (;;) { if (srcu_readers_active_idx_check(ssp, idx)) @@ -1114,30 +1118,30 @@ static bool try_check_zero(struct srcu_struct *ssp, int idx, int trycount) } /* - * Increment the ->srcu_idx counter so that future SRCU readers will + * Increment the ->srcu_ctrp counter so that future SRCU readers will * use the other rank of the ->srcu_(un)lock_count[] arrays. This allows * us to wait for pre-existing readers in a starvation-free manner. */ static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *ssp) { /* - * Because the flip of ->srcu_idx is executed only if the + * Because the flip of ->srcu_ctrp is executed only if the * preceding call to srcu_readers_active_idx_check() found that - * the ->srcu_unlock_count[] and ->srcu_lock_count[] sums matched - * and because that summing uses atomic_long_read(), there is - * ordering due to a control dependency between that summing and - * the WRITE_ONCE() in this call to srcu_flip(). This ordering - * ensures that if this updater saw a given reader's increment from - * __srcu_read_lock(), that reader was using a value of ->srcu_idx - * from before the previous call to srcu_flip(), which should be - * quite rare. This ordering thus helps forward progress because - * the grace period could otherwise be delayed by additional - * calls to __srcu_read_lock() using that old (soon to be new) - * value of ->srcu_idx. + * the ->srcu_ctrs[].srcu_unlocks and ->srcu_ctrs[].srcu_locks sums + * matched and because that summing uses atomic_long_read(), + * there is ordering due to a control dependency between that + * summing and the WRITE_ONCE() in this call to srcu_flip(). + * This ordering ensures that if this updater saw a given reader's + * increment from __srcu_read_lock(), that reader was using a value + * of ->srcu_ctrp from before the previous call to srcu_flip(), + * which should be quite rare. This ordering thus helps forward + * progress because the grace period could otherwise be delayed + * by additional calls to __srcu_read_lock() using that old (soon + * to be new) value of ->srcu_ctrp. * * This sum-equality check and ordering also ensures that if * a given call to __srcu_read_lock() uses the new value of - * ->srcu_idx, this updater's earlier scans cannot have seen + * ->srcu_ctrp, this updater's earlier scans cannot have seen * that reader's increments, which is all to the good, because * this grace period need not wait on that reader. After all, * if those earlier scans had seen that reader, there would have @@ -1152,7 +1156,8 @@ static void srcu_flip(struct srcu_struct *ssp) */ smp_mb(); /* E */ /* Pairs with B and C. */ - WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx, ssp->srcu_idx + 1); // Flip the counter. + WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_ctrp, + &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[!(ssp->srcu_ctrp - &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0])]); /* * Ensure that if the updater misses an __srcu_read_unlock() @@ -1198,7 +1203,7 @@ static bool srcu_should_expedite(struct srcu_struct *ssp) check_init_srcu_struct(ssp); /* If _lite() readers, don't do unsolicited expediting. */ - if (this_cpu_read(ssp->sda->srcu_reader_flavor) & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE) + if (this_cpu_read(ssp->sda->srcu_reader_flavor) & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_SLOWGP) return false; /* If the local srcu_data structure has callbacks, not idle. */ sdp = raw_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda); @@ -1398,8 +1403,12 @@ static void __call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp, * read-side critical sections are delimited by srcu_read_lock() and * srcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested. * - * The callback will be invoked from process context, but must nevertheless - * be fast and must not block. + * The callback will be invoked from process context, but with bh + * disabled. The callback function must therefore be fast and must + * not block. + * + * See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on + * memory ordering guarantees. */ void call_srcu(struct srcu_struct *ssp, struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func) @@ -1465,8 +1474,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu_expedited); * * Wait for the count to drain to zero of both indexes. To avoid the * possible starvation of synchronize_srcu(), it waits for the count of - * the index=((->srcu_idx & 1) ^ 1) to drain to zero at first, - * and then flip the srcu_idx and wait for the count of the other index. + * the index=!(ssp->srcu_ctrp - &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0]) to drain to zero + * at first, and then flip the ->srcu_ctrp and wait for the count of the + * other index. * * Can block; must be called from process context. * @@ -1675,7 +1685,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_barrier); */ unsigned long srcu_batches_completed(struct srcu_struct *ssp) { - return READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_idx); + return READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(srcu_batches_completed); @@ -1692,7 +1702,7 @@ static void srcu_advance_state(struct srcu_struct *ssp) /* * Because readers might be delayed for an extended period after - * fetching ->srcu_idx for their index, at any point in time there + * fetching ->srcu_ctrp for their index, at any point in time there * might well be readers using both idx=0 and idx=1. We therefore * need to wait for readers to clear from both index values before * invoking a callback. @@ -1720,7 +1730,7 @@ static void srcu_advance_state(struct srcu_struct *ssp) } if (rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq)) == SRCU_STATE_SCAN1) { - idx = 1 ^ (ssp->srcu_idx & 1); + idx = !(ssp->srcu_ctrp - &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0]); if (!try_check_zero(ssp, idx, 1)) { mutex_unlock(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_mutex); return; /* readers present, retry later. */ @@ -1738,7 +1748,7 @@ static void srcu_advance_state(struct srcu_struct *ssp) * SRCU read-side critical sections are normally short, * so check at least twice in quick succession after a flip. */ - idx = 1 ^ (ssp->srcu_idx & 1); + idx = !(ssp->srcu_ctrp - &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0]); if (!try_check_zero(ssp, idx, 2)) { mutex_unlock(&ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_mutex); return; /* readers present, retry later. */ @@ -1849,7 +1859,9 @@ static void process_srcu(struct work_struct *work) ssp = sup->srcu_ssp; srcu_advance_state(ssp); + spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup); curdelay = srcu_get_delay(ssp); + spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(ssp->srcu_sup); if (curdelay) { WRITE_ONCE(sup->reschedule_count, 0); } else { @@ -1896,7 +1908,7 @@ void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf) int ss_state = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state); int ss_state_idx = ss_state; - idx = ssp->srcu_idx & 0x1; + idx = ssp->srcu_ctrp - &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0]; if (ss_state < 0 || ss_state >= ARRAY_SIZE(srcu_size_state_name)) ss_state_idx = ARRAY_SIZE(srcu_size_state_name) - 1; pr_alert("%s%s Tree SRCU g%ld state %d (%s)", @@ -1914,8 +1926,8 @@ void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf) struct srcu_data *sdp; sdp = per_cpu_ptr(ssp->sda, cpu); - u0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[!idx])); - u1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_unlock_count[idx])); + u0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[!idx].srcu_unlocks)); + u1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_unlocks)); /* * Make sure that a lock is always counted if the corresponding @@ -1923,8 +1935,8 @@ void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf) */ smp_rmb(); - l0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[!idx])); - l1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_lock_count[idx])); + l0 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[!idx].srcu_locks)); + l1 = data_race(atomic_long_read(&sdp->srcu_ctrs[idx].srcu_locks)); c0 = l0 - u0; c1 = l1 - u1; @@ -2001,6 +2013,7 @@ static int srcu_module_coming(struct module *mod) ssp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data); if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ssp->sda)) return -ENOMEM; + ssp->srcu_ctrp = &ssp->sda->srcu_ctrs[0]; } return 0; } |