summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>2012-10-22 11:26:36 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2012-10-23 02:42:56 -0400
commit37561f68bd527ec39076e32effdc7b1dcdfb17ea (patch)
tree3b15ff453617ee5ef52e5f7a9885770b4172bc0a /net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
parent0b63bf1fe6f9ed1ec4148e8896f4522e08476b80 (diff)
downloadlwn-37561f68bd527ec39076e32effdc7b1dcdfb17ea.tar.gz
lwn-37561f68bd527ec39076e32effdc7b1dcdfb17ea.zip
tcp: Reject invalid ack_seq to Fast Open sockets
A packet with an invalid ack_seq may cause a TCP Fast Open socket to switch to the unexpected TCP_CLOSING state, triggering a BUG_ON kernel panic. When a FIN packet with an invalid ack_seq# arrives at a socket in the TCP_FIN_WAIT1 state, rather than discarding the packet, the current code will accept the FIN, causing state transition to TCP_CLOSING. This may be a small deviation from RFC793, which seems to say that the packet should be dropped. Unfortunately I did not expect this case for Fast Open hence it will trigger a BUG_ON panic. It turns out there is really nothing bad about a TFO socket going into TCP_CLOSING state so I could just remove the BUG_ON statements. But after some thought I think it's better to treat this case like TCP_SYN_RECV and return a RST to the confused peer who caused the unacceptable ack_seq to be generated in the first place. Signed-off-by: H.K. Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv4/tcp_input.c')
-rw-r--r--net/ipv4/tcp_input.c12
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 036f85738141..1db663983587 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -5964,7 +5964,7 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
req = tp->fastopen_rsk;
if (req != NULL) {
- BUG_ON(sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_RECV &&
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_RECV &&
sk->sk_state != TCP_FIN_WAIT1);
if (tcp_check_req(sk, skb, req, NULL, true) == NULL)
@@ -6053,7 +6053,15 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
* ACK we have received, this would have acknowledged
* our SYNACK so stop the SYNACK timer.
*/
- if (acceptable && req != NULL) {
+ if (req != NULL) {
+ /* Return RST if ack_seq is invalid.
+ * Note that RFC793 only says to generate a
+ * DUPACK for it but for TCP Fast Open it seems
+ * better to treat this case like TCP_SYN_RECV
+ * above.
+ */
+ if (!acceptable)
+ return 1;
/* We no longer need the request sock. */
reqsk_fastopen_remove(sk, req, false);
tcp_rearm_rto(sk);