mm/damon: add kunit tests

This commit adds kunit based unit tests for the core and the virtual
address spaces monitoring primitives of DAMON.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210716081449.22187-12-sj38.park@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Amit Shah <amit@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.com>
Cc: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com>
Cc: Fernand Sieber <sieberf@amazon.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Leonard Foerster <foersleo@amazon.de>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Markus Boehme <markubo@amazon.de>
Cc: Maximilian Heyne <mheyne@amazon.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 329 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1f5c13257dba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
@@ -0,0 +1,329 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Data Access Monitor Unit Tests
+ *
+ * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
+ */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST
+
+#ifndef _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H
+#define _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+static void __link_vmas(struct vm_area_struct *vmas, ssize_t nr_vmas)
+{
+	int i, j;
+	unsigned long largest_gap, gap;
+
+	if (!nr_vmas)
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_vmas - 1; i++) {
+		vmas[i].vm_next = &vmas[i + 1];
+
+		vmas[i].vm_rb.rb_left = NULL;
+		vmas[i].vm_rb.rb_right = &vmas[i + 1].vm_rb;
+
+		largest_gap = 0;
+		for (j = i; j < nr_vmas; j++) {
+			if (j == 0)
+				continue;
+			gap = vmas[j].vm_start - vmas[j - 1].vm_end;
+			if (gap > largest_gap)
+				largest_gap = gap;
+		}
+		vmas[i].rb_subtree_gap = largest_gap;
+	}
+	vmas[i].vm_next = NULL;
+	vmas[i].vm_rb.rb_right = NULL;
+	vmas[i].rb_subtree_gap = 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test __damon_va_three_regions() function
+ *
+ * In case of virtual memory address spaces monitoring, DAMON converts the
+ * complex and dynamic memory mappings of each target task to three
+ * discontiguous regions which cover every mapped areas.  However, the three
+ * regions should not include the two biggest unmapped areas in the original
+ * mapping, because the two biggest areas are normally the areas between 1)
+ * heap and the mmap()-ed regions, and 2) the mmap()-ed regions and stack.
+ * Because these two unmapped areas are very huge but obviously never accessed,
+ * covering the region is just a waste.
+ *
+ * '__damon_va_three_regions() receives an address space of a process.  It
+ * first identifies the start of mappings, end of mappings, and the two biggest
+ * unmapped areas.  After that, based on the information, it constructs the
+ * three regions and returns.  For more detail, refer to the comment of
+ * 'damon_init_regions_of()' function definition in 'mm/damon.c' file.
+ *
+ * For example, suppose virtual address ranges of 10-20, 20-25, 200-210,
+ * 210-220, 300-305, and 307-330 (Other comments represent this mappings in
+ * more short form: 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330) of a process are
+ * mapped.  To cover every mappings, the three regions should start with 10,
+ * and end with 305.  The process also has three unmapped areas, 25-200,
+ * 220-300, and 305-307.  Among those, 25-200 and 220-300 are the biggest two
+ * unmapped areas, and thus it should be converted to three regions of 10-25,
+ * 200-220, and 300-330.
+ */
+static void damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct damon_addr_range regions[3] = {0,};
+	/* 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330 */
+	struct vm_area_struct vmas[] = {
+		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 10, .vm_end = 20},
+		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 20, .vm_end = 25},
+		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 200, .vm_end = 210},
+		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 210, .vm_end = 220},
+		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 300, .vm_end = 305},
+		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 307, .vm_end = 330},
+	};
+
+	__link_vmas(vmas, 6);
+
+	__damon_va_three_regions(&vmas[0], regions);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 10ul, regions[0].start);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 25ul, regions[0].end);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 200ul, regions[1].start);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 220ul, regions[1].end);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 300ul, regions[2].start);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 330ul, regions[2].end);
+}
+
+static struct damon_region *__nth_region_of(struct damon_target *t, int idx)
+{
+	struct damon_region *r;
+	unsigned int i = 0;
+
+	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
+		if (i++ == idx)
+			return r;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test 'damon_va_apply_three_regions()'
+ *
+ * test			kunit object
+ * regions		an array containing start/end addresses of current
+ *			monitoring target regions
+ * nr_regions		the number of the addresses in 'regions'
+ * three_regions	The three regions that need to be applied now
+ * expected		start/end addresses of monitoring target regions that
+ *			'three_regions' are applied
+ * nr_expected		the number of addresses in 'expected'
+ *
+ * The memory mapping of the target processes changes dynamically.  To follow
+ * the change, DAMON periodically reads the mappings, simplifies it to the
+ * three regions, and updates the monitoring target regions to fit in the three
+ * regions.  The update of current target regions is the role of
+ * 'damon_va_apply_three_regions()'.
+ *
+ * This test passes the given target regions and the new three regions that
+ * need to be applied to the function and check whether it updates the regions
+ * as expected.
+ */
+static void damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(struct kunit *test,
+				unsigned long *regions, int nr_regions,
+				struct damon_addr_range *three_regions,
+				unsigned long *expected, int nr_expected)
+{
+	struct damon_ctx *ctx = damon_new_ctx();
+	struct damon_target *t;
+	struct damon_region *r;
+	int i;
+
+	t = damon_new_target(42);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_regions / 2; i++) {
+		r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]);
+		damon_add_region(r, t);
+	}
+	damon_add_target(ctx, t);
+
+	damon_va_apply_three_regions(t, three_regions);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_expected / 2; i++) {
+		r = __nth_region_of(t, i);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, expected[i * 2]);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, expected[i * 2 + 1]);
+	}
+
+	damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function test most common case where the three big regions are only
+ * slightly changed.  Target regions should adjust their boundary (10-20-30,
+ * 50-55, 70-80, 90-100) to fit with the new big regions or remove target
+ * regions (57-79) that now out of the three regions.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions1(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+	/* 5-27, 45-55, 73-104 */
+	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 45, .end = 55},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 73, .end = 104} };
+	/* 5-20-27, 45-55, 73-80-90-104 */
+	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 45, 55,
+				73, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
+
+	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test slightly bigger change.  Similar to above, but the second big region
+ * now require two target regions (50-55, 57-59) to be removed.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+	/* 5-27, 56-57, 65-104 */
+	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 56, .end = 57},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
+	/* 5-20-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */
+	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 56, 57,
+				65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
+
+	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test a big change.  The second big region has totally freed and mapped to
+ * different area (50-59 -> 61-63).  The target regions which were in the old
+ * second big region (50-55-57-59) should be removed and new target region
+ * covering the second big region (61-63) should be created.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions3(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+	/* 5-27, 61-63, 65-104 */
+	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 61, .end = 63},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
+	/* 5-20-27, 61-63, 65-80-90-104 */
+	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 61, 63,
+				65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};
+
+	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test another big change.  Both of the second and third big regions (50-59
+ * and 70-100) has totally freed and mapped to different area (30-32 and
+ * 65-68).  The target regions which were in the old second and third big
+ * regions should now be removed and new target regions covering the new second
+ * and third big regions should be crated.
+ */
+static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
+	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
+				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
+	/* 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */
+	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 7},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 30, .end = 32},
+		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 68} };
+	/* expect 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */
+	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 7, 30, 32, 65, 68};
+
+	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
+			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
+	struct damon_target *t;
+	struct damon_region *r;
+	unsigned long i;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
+			-EINVAL);
+
+	t = damon_new_target(42);
+	r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 0), -EINVAL);
+
+	damon_add_region(r, t);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 10), 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 10u);
+
+	i = 0;
+	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, i++ * 10);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, i * 10);
+	}
+	damon_free_target(t);
+
+	t = damon_new_target(42);
+	r = damon_new_region(5, 59);
+	damon_add_region(r, t);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 5), 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 5u);
+
+	i = 0;
+	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
+		if (i == 4)
+			break;
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i++);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 5 + 10 * i);
+	}
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 59ul);
+	damon_free_target(t);
+
+	t = damon_new_target(42);
+	r = damon_new_region(5, 6);
+	damon_add_region(r, t);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 2), -EINVAL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
+
+	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5ul);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 6ul);
+	}
+	damon_free_target(t);
+	damon_destroy_ctx(c);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions1),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions2),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions3),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions4),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_evenly),
+	{},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = {
+	.name = "damon-primitives",
+	.test_cases = damon_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite);
+
+#endif /* _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H */
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST */