summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2024-03-19 23:05:34 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2024-03-19 23:05:34 -0700
commit2e244a72cd489e9b8d4c779c0674c80cf92b6aab (patch)
tree53411f9aa32fbcae919dc97e705a7598893d5156 /kernel
parentf803bcf9208a2540acb4c32bdc3616673169f490 (diff)
parent51146ff0fae309a558bc8ab6cbf6cfda17356993 (diff)
downloadlwn-2e244a72cd489e9b8d4c779c0674c80cf92b6aab.tar.gz
lwn-2e244a72cd489e9b8d4c779c0674c80cf92b6aab.zip
Merge branch 'bpf-raw-tracepoint-support-for-bpf-cookie'
Andrii Nakryiko says: ==================== BPF raw tracepoint support for BPF cookie Add ability to specify and retrieve BPF cookie for raw tracepoint programs. Both BTF-aware (SEC("tp_btf")) and non-BTF-aware (SEC("raw_tp")) are supported, as they are exactly the same at runtime. This issue recently came up in production use cases, where custom tried to switch from slower classic tracepoints to raw tracepoints and ran into this limitation. Luckily, it's not that hard to support this for raw_tp programs. v2->v3: - s/bpf_raw_tp_open/bpf_raw_tracepoint_open_opts/ (Alexei, Eduard); v1->v2: - fixed type definition for stubs of bpf_probe_{register,unregister}; - added __u32 :u32 and aligned raw_tp fields (Jiri); - added Stanislav's ack. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240319233852.1977493-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/syscall.c22
-rw-r--r--kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c36
2 files changed, 34 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index ae2ff73bde7e..e44c276e8617 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3469,17 +3469,12 @@ out_put_prog:
return err;
}
-struct bpf_raw_tp_link {
- struct bpf_link link;
- struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp;
-};
-
static void bpf_raw_tp_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
{
struct bpf_raw_tp_link *raw_tp =
container_of(link, struct bpf_raw_tp_link, link);
- bpf_probe_unregister(raw_tp->btp, raw_tp->link.prog);
+ bpf_probe_unregister(raw_tp->btp, raw_tp);
bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(raw_tp->btp);
}
@@ -3779,7 +3774,7 @@ static int bpf_perf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pro
#endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
- const char __user *user_tp_name)
+ const char __user *user_tp_name, u64 cookie)
{
struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link;
@@ -3826,6 +3821,7 @@ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
bpf_link_init(&link->link, BPF_LINK_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT,
&bpf_raw_tp_link_lops, prog);
link->btp = btp;
+ link->cookie = cookie;
err = bpf_link_prime(&link->link, &link_primer);
if (err) {
@@ -3833,7 +3829,7 @@ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
goto out_put_btp;
}
- err = bpf_probe_register(link->btp, prog);
+ err = bpf_probe_register(link->btp, link);
if (err) {
bpf_link_cleanup(&link_primer);
goto out_put_btp;
@@ -3846,11 +3842,13 @@ out_put_btp:
return err;
}
-#define BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN_LAST_FIELD raw_tracepoint.prog_fd
+#define BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN_LAST_FIELD raw_tracepoint.cookie
static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
{
struct bpf_prog *prog;
+ void __user *tp_name;
+ __u64 cookie;
int fd;
if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN))
@@ -3860,7 +3858,9 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
if (IS_ERR(prog))
return PTR_ERR(prog);
- fd = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, u64_to_user_ptr(attr->raw_tracepoint.name));
+ tp_name = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->raw_tracepoint.name);
+ cookie = attr->raw_tracepoint.cookie;
+ fd = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, tp_name, cookie);
if (fd < 0)
bpf_prog_put(prog);
return fd;
@@ -5198,7 +5198,7 @@ static int link_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
goto out;
}
if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
- ret = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, NULL);
+ ret = bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(prog, NULL, attr->link_create.tracing.cookie);
else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_ITER)
ret = bpf_iter_link_attach(attr, uattr, prog);
else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 1b041911b1d8..434e3ece6688 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2004,6 +2004,8 @@ raw_tp_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
return &bpf_get_stackid_proto_raw_tp;
case BPF_FUNC_get_stack:
return &bpf_get_stack_proto_raw_tp;
+ case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie:
+ return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_tracing;
default:
return bpf_tracing_func_proto(func_id, prog);
}
@@ -2066,6 +2068,9 @@ tracing_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
case BPF_FUNC_get_func_arg_cnt:
return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_func_arg_cnt_proto : NULL;
case BPF_FUNC_get_attach_cookie:
+ if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING &&
+ prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
+ return &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_tracing;
return bpf_prog_has_trampoline(prog) ? &bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_tracing : NULL;
default:
fn = raw_tp_prog_func_proto(func_id, prog);
@@ -2366,16 +2371,26 @@ void bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp)
}
static __always_inline
-void __bpf_trace_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 *args)
+void __bpf_trace_run(struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link, u64 *args)
{
+ struct bpf_prog *prog = link->link.prog;
+ struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
+ struct bpf_trace_run_ctx run_ctx;
+
cant_sleep();
if (unlikely(this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter(prog);
goto out;
}
+
+ run_ctx.bpf_cookie = link->cookie;
+ old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
+
rcu_read_lock();
(void) bpf_prog_run(prog, args);
rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
out:
this_cpu_dec(*(prog->active));
}
@@ -2404,12 +2419,12 @@ out:
#define __SEQ_0_11 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
#define BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(x) \
- void bpf_trace_run##x(struct bpf_prog *prog, \
+ void bpf_trace_run##x(struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link, \
REPEAT(x, SARG, __DL_COM, __SEQ_0_11)) \
{ \
u64 args[x]; \
REPEAT(x, COPY, __DL_SEM, __SEQ_0_11); \
- __bpf_trace_run(prog, args); \
+ __bpf_trace_run(link, args); \
} \
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_trace_run##x)
BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(1);
@@ -2425,9 +2440,10 @@ BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(10);
BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(11);
BPF_TRACE_DEFN_x(12);
-static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link)
{
struct tracepoint *tp = btp->tp;
+ struct bpf_prog *prog = link->link.prog;
/*
* check that program doesn't access arguments beyond what's
@@ -2439,18 +2455,12 @@ static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *
if (prog->aux->max_tp_access > btp->writable_size)
return -EINVAL;
- return tracepoint_probe_register_may_exist(tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func,
- prog);
-}
-
-int bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
-{
- return __bpf_probe_register(btp, prog);
+ return tracepoint_probe_register_may_exist(tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, link);
}
-int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+int bpf_probe_unregister(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_raw_tp_link *link)
{
- return tracepoint_probe_unregister(btp->tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog);
+ return tracepoint_probe_unregister(btp->tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, link);
}
int bpf_get_perf_event_info(const struct perf_event *event, u32 *prog_id,