| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Merge cpufreq updates for 7.4:
- Minor fixes in various cpufreq drivers (Alexander Koskovich, Daniel
Schwierzeck, Frank Zhang, Haotian Zhang, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy,
Sumeet Pawnikar, and Xueqin Luo)
- Fix wrong behaviors on multi-node servers in the Loongson cpufreq
driver (Huacai Chen)
- Reject NULL from cpufreq_cpu_get() in the Rust code (Mehmet Koseoglu)
- Add suspend OPP to mediatek cpufreq driver and DT (Ryan Brue)
- Fixups for a few bugs identified by Sashiko in the amd-pstate cpufreq
driver (Mario Limoncielloi, Wentao Guan)
- Initial support for maximum frequency capacity handling on Zen6
client in amd-pstate (Mario Limonciello)
- Fix for amd-pstate-ut with 'Requested CPU Min frequency' BIOS option
(K Prateek Nayak)
- New Zen6 tuning values for EPP in amd-pstate (Mario Limonciello,
Vishal Badole)
- amd-pstate documentation fix (Karl Mehltretter)
- Restrict deferred downscaling to low load for shared policies in the
conservative cpufreq governor to avoid undesirable CPU frequency
reduction in some cases (Shengming Hu)
- Serialize sugov_start() against rate limit updates in the schedutil
cpufreq governor to avoid using a stale rate limit value (Hui Su)
* pm-cpufreq: (34 commits)
cpufreq: loongson3: Replace IOCSR read/write with MMIO ones
cpufreq: loongson3: Use global physical CPU ID in get/target callbacks
cpufreq: loongson3: Replace per-package mutex with per-node
cpufreq: loongson3: Adjust the width of id and val in smc_message
cpufreq: loongson3: Make this driver depend on MACH_LOONGSON64
cpufreq: schedutil: Serialize sugov_start() against rate limit updates
arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8173: Mark the lowest CPU OPPs for suspend
cpufreq: mediatek: Enter system sleep at the suspend OPP
cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: fix device node refcount leak in phandle parsing
cpufreq: qcom-nvmem: Add IPQ9650 support
cpufreq: Add Milos to cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklist
cpufreq: Use %pe to print error pointers symbolically
rust: rcpufreq_dt: add module alias
cpufreq: sti: avoid NULL dereference in dev_err()
cpufreq: tegra194: fix double-pointer error in get_cpu_ndiv
cpufreq: sparc-us2e: fix frequency table index copy-paste error
rust: cpufreq: reject NULL from cpufreq_cpu_get()
cpufreq: amd-pstate-ut: Fix max_freq and EPP test failures on Zen6
cpufreq: amd-pstate: Propagate cppc_set_auto_sel() errors on mode change
cpufreq: amd-pstate: Restore previous mode when changing driver mode fails
...
|
|
Rename amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator() to amd_get_effective_highest_perf()
to better reflect that it returns the effective highest performance value
for a CPU, accounting for preferred cores and heterogeneous topologies.
Add a new helper amd_get_boost_ratio() for doing both for boost
ratio calculations and update callers to use it.
This refactoring is needed because on some AMD systems (Zen6+),
the boost ratio should be calculated from frequency values rather than
performance values.
Newer versions of the ACPI will introduce a proper interface
for getting this information, but for now hardcode values so that
these systems perform as intended and to unblock future scheduler
work while we continue to wait.
For now use some temporary hardcoded values for Zen6 platforms.
Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261001142341.2934582-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
|
|
The x86 CPPC FFH accessors construct masks and shift values using the
firmware's Bit Width and Bit Offset without checking that the field fits
in an MSR. A zero-width field or a field extending beyond bit 63 can
therefore cause an invalid shift. The safe MSR accessors only handle an
access fault, not invalid field arithmetic after a successful read.
Also, the 64-bit GAS address is implicitly narrowed to the 32-bit MSR
number. A descriptor with nonzero upper address bits can access a different
MSR from the one described by firmware.
The arm64 AMU counter readers have the same unchecked field arithmetic.
Validate the field bounds before reading a counter, including both
descriptors in the paired counter path.
Dispatch FFH accesses before decoding the GAS Access Size in the common
read and write paths. Otherwise, a large access_width can trigger an
invalid shift in GET_BIT_WIDTH() before the architecture validates its
register. That field has architecture-specific FFH semantics and is not
needed by the generic memory/port accessor on this path.
Validate x86 MSR addresses and share the field-bounds checks between
related accessors within each architecture.
Fixes: a6cbcdd5ab5f ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for functional fixed hardware address")
Fixes: 68c5debcc06d ("arm64: implement CPPC FFH support using AMUs")
Fixes: f489c948028b ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix access width used for PCC registers")
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260916162805.1039247-17-christian.loehle@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
AMD heterogeneous parts report a third core type via CPUID Fn0x80000026
EBX[31:28] (Extended CPU Topology, Core Type):
0 - Performance
1 - Efficiency
2 - Low Power
get_topology_cpu_type() only translates the first two, so on parts that ship
low-power cores the third type falls through to TOPO_CPU_TYPE_UNKNOWN.
Add TOPO_CPU_TYPE_LOW_POWER which takes care of this new type.
[ bp: Massage commit message, zap the "what" explanation. ]
Signed-off-by: Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260721154514.2506972-4-Vishal.Badole@amd.com
|
|
Sashiko reported¹ that a confusion could ensue if a vendor-specific CPU
type 0 (performance) gets attempted to be used in a x86_cpu_id match
table. The current logic treats 0 as the wildcard X86_CPU_TYPE_ANY and
such a thing would end up matching the wrong CPUs.
This is all backwards because we started using the vendor-specific CPU
type number instead of using a Linux-defined, generic CPU type which
is agnostic.
Convert the current logic to it before users start appearing.
¹https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260629094349.533301-1-Vishal.Badole%40amd.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Badole <Vishal.Badole@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260721154514.2506972-2-Vishal.Badole@amd.com
|
|
Some older systems don't support CPPC in the firmware and this just makes
noise for them when booting. Drop back to debug.
This reverts commit 21fb59ab4b9767085f4fe1edbdbe3177fbb9ec97.
Fixes: 21fb59ab4b976 ("ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn")
Suggested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Tested-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260504230141.484743-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Commit 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()") introduced the ability to detect the
preferred core on AMD platforms by checking if there at least two
distinct highest_perf values.
However, it uses for_each_present_cpu() to iterate through all the
CPUs in the platform, which is problematic when the kernel is booted
with "nosmt=force" commandline option.
Hence limit the search to only the online CPUs.
Fixes: 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()")
Reported-by: Christopher Harris <chris.harris79@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAM+eXpdDT7KjLV0AxEwOLkSJ2QtrsvGvjA2cCHvt1d0k2_C4Cw@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: "Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)" <superm1@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Chrisopher Harris <chris.harris79@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251107074145.2340-2-gautham.shenoy@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Conflicts:
arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c
arch/x86/coco/sev/core.c
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
Semantic conflict:
arch/x86/include/asm/sev-internal.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
|
|
Shorten X86_FEATURE_AMD_HETEROGENEOUS_CORES to X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES
to make the last column aligned consistently in the whole file.
No functional changes.
Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) <xin@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250415175410.2944032-4-xin@zytor.com
|
|
Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Suggested-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Bitfield masks are easier to follow and less error prone.
Reviewed-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 cpuid updates from Borislav Petkov:
- Add a feature flag which denotes AMD CPUs supporting workload
classification with the purpose of using such hints when making
scheduling decisions
- Determine the boost enumerator for each AMD core based on its type:
efficiency or performance, in the cppc driver
- Add the type of a CPU to the topology CPU descriptor with the goal of
supporting and making decisions based on the type of the respective
core
- Add a feature flag to denote AMD cores which have heterogeneous
topology and enable SD_ASYM_PACKING for those
- Check microcode revisions before disabling PCID on Intel
- Cleanups and fixlets
* tag 'x86_cpu_for_v6.13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/cpu: Remove redundant CONFIG_NUMA guard around numa_add_cpu()
x86/cpu: Fix FAM5_QUARK_X1000 to use X86_MATCH_VFM()
x86/cpu: Fix formatting of cpuid_bits[] in scattered.c
x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS feature bit
x86/amd: Use heterogeneous core topology for identifying boost numerator
x86/cpu: Add CPU type to struct cpuinfo_topology
x86/cpu: Enable SD_ASYM_PACKING for PKG domain on AMD
x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_AMD_HETEROGENEOUS_CORES
x86/cpufeatures: Rename X86_FEATURE_FAST_CPPC to have AMD prefix
x86/mm: Don't disable PCID when INVLPG has been fixed by microcode
|
|
arch_init_invariance_cppc() is called at the end of
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() in order to configure frequency invariance
based upon the values from _CPC.
This however doesn't work on AMD CPPC shared memory designs that have
AMD preferred cores enabled because _CPC needs to be analyzed from all
cores to judge if preferred cores are enabled.
This issue manifests to users as a warning since commit 21fb59ab4b97
("ACPI: CPPC: Adjust debug messages in amd_set_max_freq_ratio() to warn"):
```
Could not retrieve highest performance (-19)
```
However the warning isn't the cause of this, it was actually
commit 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()") which exposed the issue.
To fix this problem, change arch_init_invariance_cppc() into a new weak
symbol that is called at the end of acpi_processor_driver_init().
Each architecture that supports it can declare the symbol to override
the weak one.
Define it for x86, in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c, and for all of the
architectures using the generic arch_topology.c code.
Fixes: 279f838a61f9 ("x86/amd: Detect preferred cores in amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()")
Reported-by: Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx@intelfx.name>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219431
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241104222855.3959267-1-superm1@kernel.org
[ rjw: Changelog edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
AMD heterogeneous designs include two types of cores:
* Performance
* Efficiency
Each core type has different highest performance values configured by the
platform. Drivers such as amd_pstate need to identify the type of core to
correctly set an appropriate boost numerator to calculate the maximum
frequency.
X86_FEATURE_AMD_HETEROGENEOUS_CORES is used to identify whether the SoC
supports heterogeneous core type by reading CPUID leaf Fn_0x80000026.
On performance cores the scaling factor of 196 is used. On efficiency cores
the scaling factor is the value reported as the highest perf. Efficiency
cores have the same preferred core rankings.
Suggested-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025171459.1093-6-mario.limonciello@amd.com
|
|
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator()
The special case in amd_pstate_highest_perf_set() is the value used
for calculating the boost numerator. Merge this into
amd_get_boost_ratio_numerator() and then use that to calculate boost
ratio.
This allows dropping more special casing of the highest perf value.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
AMD systems that support preferred cores will use "166" as their
numerator for max frequency calculations instead of "255".
Add a function for detecting preferred cores by looking at the
highest perf value on all cores.
If preferred cores are enabled return 166 and if disabled the
value in the highest perf register. As the function will be called
multiple times, cache the values for the boost numerator and if
preferred cores will be enabled in global variables.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
amd_pstate_get_highest_perf() is a helper used to get the highest perf
value on AMD systems. It's used in amd-pstate as part of preferred
core handling, but applicable for acpi-cpufreq as well.
Move it out to cppc handling code as amd_get_highest_perf().
Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
If the boost ratio isn't calculated properly for the system for any
reason this can cause other problems that are non-obvious.
Raise all messages to warn instead.
Suggested-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
perf_ratio is a u64 and SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE is a large number.
Shifting by one will never have a zero value.
Drop the check.
Suggested-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.sheoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
The function name is ambiguous because it returns an intermediate value
for calculating maximum frequency rather than the CPPC 'Highest Perf'
register.
Rename the function to clarify its use and allow the function to return
errors. Adjust the consumer in acpi-cpufreq to catch errors.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
To prepare to let amd_get_highest_perf() detect preferred cores
it will require CPPC functions. Move amd_get_highest_perf() to
cppc.c to prepare for 'preferred core detection' rework.
No functional changes intended.
Reviewed-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
|
|
As there are some AMD processors which only support CPPC V2 firmware and
BIOS implementation, the amd_pstate driver will be failed to load when
system booting with below kernel warning message:
[ 0.477523] amd_pstate: the _CPC object is not present in SBIOS or ACPI disabled
To make the amd_pstate driver can be loaded on those TR40 processors, it
needs to match x86_model from 0x30 to 0x7F for family 17H.
With the change, the system can load amd_pstate driver as expected.
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Reported-by: Gino Badouri <badouri.g@gmail.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218171
Fixes: fbd74d1689 ("ACPI: CPPC: Fix enabling CPPC on AMD systems with shared memory")
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
When commit 72f2ecb7ece7 ("ACPI: bus: Set CPPC _OSC bits for all
and when CPPC_LIB is supported") was introduced, we found collateral
damage that a number of AMD systems that supported CPPC but
didn't advertise support in _OSC stopped having a functional
amd-pstate driver. The _OSC was only enforced on Intel systems at that
time.
This was fixed for the MSR based designs by commit 8b356e536e69f
("ACPI: CPPC: Don't require _OSC if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is supported")
but some shared memory based designs also support CPPC but haven't
advertised support in the _OSC. Add support for those designs as well by
hardcoding the list of systems.
Fixes: 72f2ecb7ece7 ("ACPI: bus: Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported")
Fixes: 8b356e536e69f ("ACPI: CPPC: Don't require _OSC if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is supported")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/3559249.JlDtxWtqDm@natalenko.name/
Cc: 5.18+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.18+
Reported-and-tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
commit 72f2ecb7ece7 ("ACPI: bus: Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and
when CPPC_LIB is supported") added support for claiming to
support CPPC in _OSC on non-Intel platforms.
This unfortunately caused a regression on a vartiety of AMD
platforms in the field because a number of AMD platforms don't set
the `_OSC` bit 5 or 6 to indicate CPPC or CPPC v2 support.
As these AMD platforms already claim CPPC support via a dedicated
MSR from `X86_FEATURE_CPPC`, use this enable this feature rather
than requiring the `_OSC` on platforms with a dedicated MSR.
If there is additional breakage on the shared memory designs also
missing this _OSC, additional follow up changes may be needed.
Fixes: 72f2ecb7ece7 ("Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported")
Reported-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
AMD boot CPU initialization happens late via ACPI/CPPC which prevents the
Intel parts from being marked __init.
Split out the common code and provide a dedicated interface for the AMD
initialization and mark the Intel specific code and data __init.
The remaining text size is almost cut in half:
text: 2614 -> 1350
init.text: 0 -> 786
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415161206.592465719@linutronix.de
|
|
This code is convoluted and because it can be invoked post init via the
ACPI/CPPC code, all of the initialization functionality is built in instead
of being part of init text and init data.
As a first step create separate calls for the boot and the application
processors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220415161206.536733494@linutronix.de
|
|
The init_freq_invariance_cppc code actually doesn't need the SMP
functionality. So setting the CONFIG_SMP as the check condition for
init_freq_invariance_cppc may cause the confusion to misunderstand the
CPPC. And the x86 CPPC file is better space to store the CPPC related
functions, while the init_freq_invariance_cppc is out of smpboot, that
means, the CONFIG_SMP won't be mandatory condition any more. And It's more
clear than before.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
[ rjw: Subject adjustment ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The AMD maximum frequency ratio setting function depends on CPPC, so the
x86 CPPC implementation file is better space for this function.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
[ rjw: Subject adjustment ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Rename the cppc_msr.c to cppc.c in x86 ACPI, that expects to use this file
to cover more function implementation for ACPI CPPC beside MSR helpers.
Naming as "cppc" is more straightforward as one of the functionalities
under ACPI subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
