| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
By convention MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() immediately follows the ID table it
exports, because this is easier to read and verify. It also makes more
sense since #ifdef for ACPI or OF could hide both of them.
Some Qualcomm pin controller drivers already have this correctly placed,
so adjust the other drivers. No functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
|
|
On all Qualcomm TLMM generations from APQ8084 onwards, the interrupt
target routing bits are located in the same register as the interrupt
configuration bits (intr_cfg_reg). Only five older SoCs — APQ8064,
IPQ8064, MDM9615, MSM8660 and MSM8960 — have a genuinely separate
interrupt target routing register at a different offset (0x400 + 0x4 * id).
Replace MSM_ACCESSOR(intr_target) with a custom accessor that falls back
to intr_cfg_reg when intr_target_reg is zero. Apply the same fallback in
the SCM path. Drop the now-redundant .intr_target_reg initializer from
all SoC drivers where it duplicated intr_cfg_reg, keeping it only in
the five drivers where it genuinely differs.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
|
|
Allow pins muxed to the "gpio" or "egpio" function to be requested as
GPIOs even if pinmux_ops say the controller should be strict.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
In order to simplify cleanup actions, use devres-enabled version of
gpiochip_add_data(). As the msm_pinctrl_remove() function is now empty,
drop it and all its calls from the corresponding pinctrl drivers.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250513-pinctrl-msm-fix-v2-3-249999af0fc1@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
After commit 0edb555a65d1 ("platform: Make platform_driver::remove()
return void") .remove() is (again) the right callback to implement for
platform drivers.
Convert all platform drivers below drivers/pinctrl to use .remove(),
with the eventual goal to drop struct platform_driver::remove_new(). As
.remove() and .remove_new() have the same prototypes, conversion is done
by just changing the structure member name in the driver initializer.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241007205803.444994-8-u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
To convert all those qcom pinctrl drivers, make msm_pinctrl_remove()
return void (instead of zero) and use .remove_new in all drivers.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009162510.335208-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Reuse the generic pingroup struct from pinctrl.h in msm_pingroup
along with the macro defined.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1684133170-18540-3-git-send-email-quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Remove the msm_function struct to reuse the generic pinfunction
struct. Also, define a generic PINFUNCTION macro that can be used across
qcom target specific pinctrl files to avoid code repetition.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>
Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1684133170-18540-2-git-send-email-quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
"gpio52" and "gpio53" are duplicated in gpio_groups, fix them!
Fixes: ac43c44a7a37 ("pinctrl: qcom: Add SDX55 pincontrol driver")
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526082857.174682-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
clang is clearly correct to point out a typo in a silly
array of strings:
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdx55.c:426:61: error: suspicious concatenation of string literals in an array initialization; did you mean to separate the elements with a comma? [-Werror,-Wstring-concatenation]
"gpio14", "gpio15", "gpio16", "gpio17", "gpio18", "gpio19" "gpio20", "gpio21", "gpio22",
^
Add the missing comma that must have accidentally been removed.
Fixes: ac43c44a7a37 ("pinctrl: qcom: Add SDX55 pincontrol driver")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210323131728.2702789-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Add initial Qualcomm SDX55 pinctrl driver to support pin configuration
with pinctrl framework for SDX55 SoC.
[ported from downstream and tidy up]
Signed-off-by: Jeevan Shriram <jshriram@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109062620.14566-3-vkoul@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|