summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/nova-core/bitfield.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-07-03gpu: nova-core: remove local bitfield macroAlexandre Courbot
This module is now orphaned code, superseded by a kernel-global implementation, so remove it. Reviewed-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260701-nova-bitfield-v2-2-2e949bf1836c@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
2026-06-10rust: make `build_assert` module the home of related macrosGary Guo
Given the macro scoping rules, all macros are rendered twice, in the module and in the top-level of kernel crate. Add `#[doc(hidden)]` to the macro definition and `#[doc(inline)]` to the re-export inside `build_assert` module so the top-level items are hidden. [ Sadly, because the definition is hidden, `rustdoc` decides to not list them as re-exports in the `prelude` page anymore, even if we refer to the not-actually-hidden item. - Miguel ] Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Acked-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260609142637.373347-1-gary@kernel.org [ Kept a single declaration in the prelude, and reworded since they already had `no_inline`. Removed other imports from `predefine` since we now use the prelude. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
2026-04-05gpu: nova-core: bitfield: fix broken Default implementationEliot Courtney
The current implementation does not actually set the default values for the fields in the bitfield. Fixes: 3fa145bef533 ("gpu: nova-core: register: generate correct `Default` implementation") Signed-off-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260401-fix-bitfield-v2-1-2fa68c98114a@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
2025-10-25gpu: nova-core: bitfield: remove BitOr implementationAlexandre Courbot
Using this operand can produce invalid values. It also doesn't bring any benefit as one can use the builder pattern to assemble a new value. Reported-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/F3853912-2C1C-4F9B-89B0-3168689F35B3@nvidia.com/ Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20251022-nova-bitfield-v1-3-73bc0988667b@nvidia.com>
2025-10-25gpu: nova-core: bitfield: simplify expressionAlexandre Courbot
The shift is more easily expressed by the index of the lowest bit of the field. Reported-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/F3853912-2C1C-4F9B-89B0-3168689F35B3@nvidia.com/ Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20251022-nova-bitfield-v1-2-73bc0988667b@nvidia.com>
2025-10-25gpu: nova-core: bitfield: simplify conditionAlexandre Courbot
This condition was uselessly convoluted. Reported-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/F3853912-2C1C-4F9B-89B0-3168689F35B3@nvidia.com/ Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20251022-nova-bitfield-v1-1-73bc0988667b@nvidia.com>
2025-10-21gpu: nova-core: bitfield: Add support for custom visibilityJoel Fernandes
Add support for custom visibility to allow for users to control visibility of the structure and helpers. Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev> Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> [acourbot@nvidia.com: fix long lines warnings and typo in commit message.] Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20251016151323.1201196-5-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
2025-10-21gpu: nova-core: bitfield: Add support for different storage widthsJoel Fernandes
Previously, bitfields were hardcoded to use u32 as the underlying storage type. Add support for different storage types (u8, u16, u32, u64) to the bitfield macro. New syntax is: struct Name(<type ex., u32>) { ... } Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev> Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> [acourbot@nvidia.com: fix long lines warnings.] Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20251016151323.1201196-4-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
2025-10-21gpu: nova-core: bitfield: Move bitfield-specific code from register! into ↵Joel Fernandes
new macro Move the bitfield-specific code from the register macro into a new macro called bitfield. This will be used to define structs with bitfields, similar to C language. Reviewed-by: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20251016151323.1201196-3-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>