mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: test preservation of quota state

Check that damon_new_scheme() initializes the new scheme's quota without
changing the quota passed as a parameter.  Cover all eight fields
initialized by damos_quota_init().

Also check that damon_commit_ctx() preserves those fields in the
destination scheme for both accepted and rejected parameter updates.  Use
an invalid min_region_sz for the rejected update and confirm that
returning -EINVAL leaves the running quota state unchanged.

Without the preceding fix, all eight fields are cleared in the constructor
test and in both context update cases.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260928085835.7675-3-sj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Bijan Tabatabai <bijan311@gmail.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@davidgow.net>

1 files changed, 107 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
index df84d9cc7d20..ce17f4458308 100644
--- a/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
+++ b/mm/damon/tests/core-kunit.h
@@ -812,6 +812,48 @@ static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test)
 	damos_destroy_filter(filter);
 }
 
+static void damos_test_new_scheme_keeps_src_quota(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct damos_access_pattern pattern = {};
+	struct damon_target target = {};
+	struct damos_quota quota = {
+		.sz = SZ_64K,
+		.esz = 123,
+		.esz_bp = 456,
+		.total_charged_sz = 789,
+		.total_charged_ns = 1011,
+		.charged_sz = 12,
+		.charged_from = 13,
+		.charge_target_from = &target,
+		.charge_addr_from = 14,
+	};
+	struct damos_watermarks wmarks = {};
+	struct damos *s;
+
+	s = damon_new_scheme(&pattern, DAMOS_STAT, 0, &quota, &wmarks,
+			NUMA_NO_NODE);
+	if (!s)
+		kunit_skip(test, "scheme alloc fail");
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.sz, (unsigned long)SZ_64K);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.esz, 0ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.esz_bp, 0ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.total_charged_sz, 0ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.total_charged_ns, 0ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.charged_sz, 0ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.charged_from, 0ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, s->quota.charge_target_from, NULL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.charge_addr_from, 0ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, quota.esz, 123ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, quota.esz_bp, 456ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, quota.total_charged_sz, 789ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, quota.total_charged_ns, 1011ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, quota.charged_sz, 12ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, quota.charged_from, 13ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, quota.charge_target_from, &target);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, quota.charge_addr_from, 14ul);
+	damon_destroy_scheme(s);
+}
+
 static void damos_test_commit_quota_goal_for(struct kunit *test,
 		struct damos_quota_goal *dst,
 		struct damos_quota_goal *src)
@@ -1572,6 +1614,69 @@ static void damon_test_commit_ctx(struct kunit *test)
 	damon_destroy_ctx(dst);
 }
 
+static void damon_test_commit_ctx_keeps_quota_for(struct kunit *test,
+		unsigned long min_region_sz, int expected_err)
+{
+	struct damos_access_pattern pattern = {};
+	struct damos_quota quota = {.sz = SZ_64K};
+	struct damos_watermarks wmarks = {};
+	struct damon_ctx *src, *dst;
+	struct damon_target *target;
+	struct damos *s;
+
+	dst = damon_new_ctx();
+	if (!dst)
+		kunit_skip(test, "dst alloc fail");
+	target = damon_new_target();
+	if (!target) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(dst);
+		kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail");
+	}
+	damon_add_target(dst, target);
+	s = damon_new_scheme(&pattern, DAMOS_STAT, 0, &quota, &wmarks,
+			NUMA_NO_NODE);
+	if (!s) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(dst);
+		kunit_skip(test, "scheme alloc fail");
+	}
+	damon_add_scheme(dst, s);
+
+	/* Copy the parameters before populating dst's runtime quota state. */
+	src = damon_new_test_ctx(dst);
+	if (!src) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(dst);
+		kunit_skip(test, "src alloc fail");
+	}
+	src->min_region_sz = min_region_sz;
+	s->quota.esz = 123;
+	s->quota.esz_bp = 456;
+	s->quota.total_charged_sz = 789;
+	s->quota.total_charged_ns = 1011;
+	s->quota.charged_sz = 12;
+	s->quota.charged_from = 13;
+	s->quota.charge_target_from = target;
+	s->quota.charge_addr_from = 14;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_commit_ctx(dst, src), expected_err);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.esz, 123ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.esz_bp, 456ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.total_charged_sz, 789ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.total_charged_ns, 1011ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.charged_sz, 12ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.charged_from, 13ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, s->quota.charge_target_from, target);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, s->quota.charge_addr_from, 14ul);
+	damon_destroy_ctx(src);
+	damon_destroy_ctx(dst);
+}
+
+static void damon_test_commit_ctx_keeps_quota(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* Only power of two min_region_sz is allowed. */
+	damon_test_commit_ctx_keeps_quota_for(test, 4096, 0);
+	damon_test_commit_ctx_keeps_quota_for(test, 4095, -EINVAL);
+}
+
 static void damon_test_valid_probe_params(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct damon_ctx *ctx;
@@ -2259,6 +2364,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_mvsum),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_nr_accesses_mvsum),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_new_filter),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_new_scheme_keeps_src_quota),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_commit_quota_goal),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_commit_quota_goals),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_commit_quota),
@@ -2270,6 +2376,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_commit_filter),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_commit_probes),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_commit_ctx),
+	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_commit_ctx_keeps_quota),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_valid_probe_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_filter_out),
 	KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_apply_scheme_filtered_sz),