diff options
| author | Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn> | 2026-06-18 21:04:14 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2026-07-02 23:26:45 -0700 |
| commit | 7ec841c5fb22abaaea7989b5fdf6f7c1f8970359 (patch) | |
| tree | 7891aa5c34cc6dfe7601d97f69d9c513b87543ac | |
| parent | 33d4efa3d9ec9094e3fe3410e8189b1487cd6d46 (diff) | |
| download | linux-next-7ec841c5fb22abaaea7989b5fdf6f7c1f8970359.tar.gz linux-next-7ec841c5fb22abaaea7989b5fdf6f7c1f8970359.zip | |
mm/percpu: avoid IO/FS reclaim in backing allocations
Commit 9a5b183941b5 ("mm, percpu: do not consider sleepable allocations
atomic") allows sleepable GFP_NOIO and GFP_NOFS percpu allocations to take
pcpu_alloc_mutex. This avoids premature allocation failures, but it also
makes the mutex visible to callers from constrained IO/FS contexts.
Thread A calls pcpu_alloc_noprof() with GFP_KERNEL and takes
pcpu_alloc_mutex. Since the internal allocation is not constrained by
NOFS, it may enter FS reclaim while still holding pcpu_alloc_mutex,
creating a dependency like: pcpu_alloc_mutex -> fs_reclaim -> FS lock
At the same time, Thread B may already hold an FS lock and then call
pcpu_alloc_noprof() with GFP_NOFS. It will try to acquire
pcpu_alloc_mutex and block, creating the reverse dependency: FS lock ->
pcpu_alloc_mutex
This can still form a potential deadlock cycle.
Avoid the dependency by restricting percpu backing allocations to
GFP_NOIO. The public allocation still uses the caller's GFP context to
decide whether it may block, but the internal memory allocations performed
while pcpu_alloc_mutex is held cannot recurse into IO or FS reclaim.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260618130414.96383-5-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev
Fixes: 9a5b183941b5 ("mm, percpu: do not consider sleepable allocations atomic")
Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: Shivam Kalra <shivamkalra98@zohomail.in>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/percpu.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c index 4d89965cba16..a802d72c116f 100644 --- a/mm/percpu.c +++ b/mm/percpu.c @@ -1726,9 +1726,8 @@ static void pcpu_alloc_tag_free_hook(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int off, size_t s * @gfp: allocation flags * * Allocate percpu area of @size bytes aligned at @align. If @gfp doesn't - * contain %GFP_KERNEL, the allocation is atomic. If @gfp has __GFP_NOWARN - * then no warning will be triggered on invalid or failed allocation - * requests. + * allow blocking, the allocation is atomic. If @gfp has __GFP_NOWARN then no + * warning will be triggered on invalid or failed allocation requests. * * RETURNS: * Percpu pointer to the allocated area on success, NULL on failure. @@ -1749,8 +1748,17 @@ void __percpu *pcpu_alloc_noprof(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved, size_t bits, bit_align; gfp = current_gfp_context(gfp); - /* whitelisted flags that can be passed to the backing allocators */ - pcpu_gfp = gfp & (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN); + /* + * Allowlisted flags that can be passed to the backing allocators. + * Backing allocations under pcpu_alloc_mutex must not recurse into + * IO/FS reclaim. Otherwise a GFP_KERNEL caller holding the mutex can + * block on reclaim while a GFP_NOIO/NOFS caller holding an IO/FS lock + * waits for the same mutex. + * + * Do not pass __GFP_NOFAIL. A small percpu allocation may need many + * backing pages, making nofail reclaim too costly under NOIO/NOFS. + */ + pcpu_gfp = gfp & (GFP_NOIO | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN); is_atomic = !gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp); do_warn = !(gfp & __GFP_NOWARN); |
