diff options
| author | Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com> | 2026-09-07 22:06:24 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2026-09-13 21:59:21 -0700 |
| commit | 26a43a5f8c31b9132dc40a449d0f6c7ecfaa1f40 (patch) | |
| tree | bc8c76933d7fd10447e120522cb2d982ddfd25c5 | |
| parent | ef1fb82f12186dd26153b14d9fbcf4ec98db81b3 (diff) | |
| download | linux-next-26a43a5f8c31b9132dc40a449d0f6c7ecfaa1f40.tar.gz linux-next-26a43a5f8c31b9132dc40a449d0f6c7ecfaa1f40.zip | |
selftests/bpf: cover the exception callback using its own BPF stack
The existing exception tests do not reach a callback that materializes
BPF_REG_FP into a register. They either throw from the main program,
where BPF_REG_FP already holds the value the callback needs, or use a
callback whose only stack accesses are frame pointer relative, which the
arm64 JIT rewrites to be stack pointer relative.
Add a test that throws from a subprogram using its own BPF stack, with a
callback that hands the address of a local variable to
bpf_probe_read_kernel(). The helper and the callback have to name the
same slot for the value read back to be the one the helper stored.
Signed-off-by: Donggeun Yoo <donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260907130624.611942-3-donggeunyoo.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c | 30 |
2 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c index 3588d6f97fd4..639866ce09a9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void test_exceptions_success(void) RUN_SUCCESS(exception_ext, 0); RUN_SUCCESS(exception_ext_mod_cb_runtime, 35); RUN_SUCCESS(exception_throw_subprog, 1); + RUN_SUCCESS(exception_throw_subprog_stack_cb, 0x1234); RUN_SUCCESS(exception_assert_nz_gfunc, 1); RUN_SUCCESS(exception_assert_zero_gfunc, 1); RUN_SUCCESS(exception_assert_neg_gfunc, 1); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c index c8d716fbd419..91c81971e58c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c @@ -212,6 +212,36 @@ int exception_throw_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) return 0; } +u64 exception_cb_stack_src = 0x1234; + +/* + * The address handed to the helper has to be this callback's own stack + * slot, not one from a frame that is already gone. + */ +__noinline int exception_cb_stack(u64 cookie) +{ + volatile u64 val = 0xdead; + + bpf_probe_read_kernel((void *)&val, sizeof(val), &exception_cb_stack_src); + return val; +} + +/* Throws from a subprogram that has a stack of its own. */ +__noinline static int throwing_subprog_stack(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + volatile u64 pad[4] = {}; + + bpf_throw(pad[0]); + return 0; +} + +SEC("tc") +__exception_cb(exception_cb_stack) +int exception_throw_subprog_stack_cb(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return throwing_subprog_stack(ctx); +} + __noinline int assert_nz_gfunc(u64 c) { volatile u64 cookie = c; |
