summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/tile/include/asm/spinlock_64.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-03-16arch: remove tile portArnd Bergmann
The Tile architecture port was added by Chris Metcalf in 2010, and maintained until early 2018 when he orphaned it due to his departure from Mellanox, and nobody else stepped up to maintain it. The product line is still around in the form of the BlueField SoC, but no longer uses the Tile architecture. There are also still products for sale with Tile-GX SoCs, notably the Mikrotik CCR router family. The products all use old (linux-3.3) kernels with lots of patches and won't be upgraded by their manufacturers. There have been efforts to port both OpenWRT and Debian to these, but both projects have stalled and are very unlikely to be continued in the future. Given that we are reasonably sure that nobody is still using the port with an upstream kernel any more, it seems better to remove it now while the port is in a good shape than to let it bitrot for a few years first. Cc: Chris Metcalf <chris.d.metcalf@gmail.com> Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> Link: http://www.mellanox.com/page/npu_multicore_overview Link: https://jenkins.debian.net/view/rebootstrap/job/rebootstrap_tilegx_gcc7/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2017-10-10locking/arch: Remove dummy arch_{read,spin,write}_lock_flags() implementationsWill Deacon
The arch_{read,spin,write}_lock_flags() macros are simply mapped to the non-flags versions by the majority of architectures, so do this in core code and remove the dummy implementations. Also remove the implementation in spinlock_up.h, since all callers of do_raw_spin_lock_flags() call local_irq_save(flags) anyway. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock()Will Deacon
Outside of the locking code itself, {read,spin,write}_can_lock() have no users in tree. Apparmor (the last remaining user of write_can_lock()) got moved over to lockdep by the previous patch. This patch removes the use of {read,spin,write}_can_lock() from the BUILD_LOCK_OPS macro, deferring to the trylock operation for testing the lock status, and subsequently removes the unused macros altogether. They aren't guaranteed to work in a concurrent environment and can give incorrect results in the case of qrwlock. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-17arch: Remove spin_unlock_wait() arch-specific definitionsPaul E. McKenney
There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock pair. This commit therefore removes the underlying arch-specific arch_spin_unlock_wait() for all architectures providing them. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2015-04-28tile: use READ_ONCE() in arch_spin_is_locked()Chris Metcalf
This avoid potential issues if callers were to loop on these routines without some kind of memory barrier. Currently there are no such users in-tree, but it seems better safe than sorry. Also, in the tilepro case we read "current" before "next", which gives us a slightly better guarantee that the lock was actually unlocked at least momentarily if we return claiming that it is not locked. None of the callers actually rely on this behavior, as far as I know, however. Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
2013-08-30tile: fix some -Wsign-compare warningsChris Metcalf
Normally the build doesn't include these warnings, but at one point I built with -Wsign-compare, and noticed a few things that are technically bugs. This change fixes those things. Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
2012-04-02arch/tile: use atomic exchange in arch_write_unlock()Chris Metcalf
This idiom is used elsewhere when we do an unlock by writing a zero, but I missed it here. Using an atomic operation avoids waiting on the write buffer for the unlocking write to be sent to the home cache. Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
2011-05-12arch/tile: finish enabling support for TILE-Gx 64-bit chipChris Metcalf
This support was partially present in the existing code (look for "__tilegx__" ifdefs) but with this change you can build a working kernel using the TILE-Gx toolchain and ARCH=tilegx. Most of these files are new, generally adding a foo_64.c file where previously there was just a foo_32.c file. The ARCH=tilegx directive redirects to arch/tile, not arch/tilegx, using the existing SRCARCH mechanism in the top-level Makefile. Changes to existing files: - <asm/bitops.h> and <asm/bitops_32.h> changed to factor the include of <asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h> in the common header. - <asm/compat.h> and arch/tile/kernel/compat.c changed to remove the "const" markers I had put on compat_sys_execve() when trying to match some recent similar changes to the non-compat execve. It turns out the compat version wasn't "upgraded" to use const. - <asm/opcode-tile_64.h> and <asm/opcode_constants_64.h> were previously included accidentally, with the 32-bit contents. Now they have the proper 64-bit contents. Finally, I had to hack the existing hacky drivers/input/input-compat.h to add yet another "#ifdef" for INPUT_COMPAT_TEST (same as x86_64). Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> [drivers/input]