diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c | 18 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c index d6c18fd740ec..13cd0a688a65 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/rs400.c @@ -256,8 +256,22 @@ int rs400_mc_wait_for_idle(struct radeon_device *rdev) static void rs400_gpu_init(struct radeon_device *rdev) { - /* FIXME: is this correct ? */ - r420_pipes_init(rdev); + /* Earlier code was calling r420_pipes_init and then + * rs400_mc_wait_for_idle(rdev). The problem is that + * at least on my Mobility Radeon Xpress 200M RC410 card + * that ends up in this code path ends up num_gb_pipes == 3 + * while the card seems to have only one pipe. With the + * r420 pipe initialization method. + * + * Problems shown up as HyperZ glitches, see: + * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110897 + * + * Delegating initialization to r300 code seems to work + * and results in proper pipe numbers. The rs400 cards + * are said to be not r400, but r300 kind of cards. + */ + r300_gpu_init(rdev); + if (rs400_mc_wait_for_idle(rdev)) { pr_warn("rs400: Failed to wait MC idle while programming pipes. Bad things might happen. %08x\n", RREG32(RADEON_MC_STATUS)); |