diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2023-11-21 11:39:36 -1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2023-11-22 06:17:26 -1000 |
commit | 4a6c5607d4502ccd1b15b57d57f17d12b6f257a7 (patch) | |
tree | 368ed1170874446f5cce4932d652a28c876421ea /kernel | |
parent | a12deb44f9734dc25970c266249b272e44d3d1b5 (diff) | |
download | lwn-4a6c5607d4502ccd1b15b57d57f17d12b6f257a7.tar.gz lwn-4a6c5607d4502ccd1b15b57d57f17d12b6f257a7.zip |
workqueue: Make sure that wq_unbound_cpumask is never empty
During boot, depending on how the housekeeping and workqueue.unbound_cpus
masks are set, wq_unbound_cpumask can end up empty. Since 8639ecebc9b1
("workqueue: Implement non-strict affinity scope for unbound workqueues"),
this may end up feeding -1 as a CPU number into scheduler leading to oopses.
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff8305e9c0
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
select_idle_sibling+0x79/0xaf0
select_task_rq_fair+0x1cb/0x7b0
try_to_wake_up+0x29c/0x5c0
wake_up_process+0x19/0x20
kick_pool+0x5e/0xb0
__queue_work+0x119/0x430
queue_work_on+0x29/0x30
...
An empty wq_unbound_cpumask is a clear misconfiguration and already
disallowed once system is booted up. Let's warn on and ignore
unbound_cpumask restrictions which lead to no unbound cpus. While at it,
also remove now unncessary empty check on wq_unbound_cpumask in
wq_select_unbound_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-and-Tested-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231120121623.119780-1-alexyonghe@tencent.com
Fixes: 8639ecebc9b1 ("workqueue: Implement non-strict affinity scope for unbound workqueues")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 6e578f576a6f..2989b57e154a 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -1684,9 +1684,6 @@ static int wq_select_unbound_cpu(int cpu) pr_warn_once("workqueue: round-robin CPU selection forced, expect performance impact\n"); } - if (cpumask_empty(wq_unbound_cpumask)) - return cpu; - new_cpu = __this_cpu_read(wq_rr_cpu_last); new_cpu = cpumask_next_and(new_cpu, wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_online_mask); if (unlikely(new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)) { @@ -6515,6 +6512,17 @@ static inline void wq_watchdog_init(void) { } #endif /* CONFIG_WQ_WATCHDOG */ +static void __init restrict_unbound_cpumask(const char *name, const struct cpumask *mask) +{ + if (!cpumask_intersects(wq_unbound_cpumask, mask)) { + pr_warn("workqueue: Restricting unbound_cpumask (%*pb) with %s (%*pb) leaves no CPU, ignoring\n", + cpumask_pr_args(wq_unbound_cpumask), name, cpumask_pr_args(mask)); + return; + } + + cpumask_and(wq_unbound_cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask, mask); +} + /** * workqueue_init_early - early init for workqueue subsystem * @@ -6534,11 +6542,11 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void) BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct pool_workqueue) < __alignof__(long long)); BUG_ON(!alloc_cpumask_var(&wq_unbound_cpumask, GFP_KERNEL)); - cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_WQ)); - cpumask_and(wq_unbound_cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)); - + cpumask_copy(wq_unbound_cpumask, cpu_possible_mask); + restrict_unbound_cpumask("HK_TYPE_WQ", housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_WQ)); + restrict_unbound_cpumask("HK_TYPE_DOMAIN", housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)); if (!cpumask_empty(&wq_cmdline_cpumask)) - cpumask_and(wq_unbound_cpumask, wq_unbound_cpumask, &wq_cmdline_cpumask); + restrict_unbound_cpumask("workqueue.unbound_cpus", &wq_cmdline_cpumask); pwq_cache = KMEM_CACHE(pool_workqueue, SLAB_PANIC); |