summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/irq
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2017-06-29 23:33:38 +0200
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2017-07-04 12:46:16 +0200
commit46e48e257360f0845fe17089713cbad4db611e70 (patch)
treebd2a904fb949d135cf8bd09964fe734a1d9138e1 /kernel/irq
parent9114014cf4e6df0b22d764380ae1fc54f1a7a8b2 (diff)
downloadlwn-46e48e257360f0845fe17089713cbad4db611e70.tar.gz
lwn-46e48e257360f0845fe17089713cbad4db611e70.zip
genirq: Move irq resource handling out of spinlocked region
Aside of being conceptually wrong, there is also an actual (hard to trigger and mostly theoretical) problem. CPU0 CPU1 free_irq(X) interrupt X spin_lock(desc->lock) wake irq thread() spin_unlock(desc->lock) spin_lock(desc->lock) remove action() shutdown_irq() release_resources() thread_handler() spin_unlock(desc->lock) access released resources. synchronize_irq() Move the release resources invocation after synchronize_irq() so it's guaranteed that the threaded handler has finished. Move the resource request call out of the desc->lock held region as well, so the invocation context is the same for both request and release. This solves the problems with those functions on RT as well. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com> Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629214344.117028181@linutronix.de
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/irq')
-rw-r--r--kernel/irq/manage.c23
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 0139908b8d53..3e693430bfe1 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1168,6 +1168,14 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
+ if (!desc->action) {
+ ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
+ new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
+ goto out_mutex;
+ }
+ }
chip_bus_lock(desc);
@@ -1271,13 +1279,6 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
}
if (!shared) {
- ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
- new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
- goto out_unlock;
- }
-
init_waitqueue_head(&desc->wait_for_threads);
/* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */
@@ -1386,6 +1387,10 @@ out_unlock:
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
+ if (!desc->action)
+ irq_release_resources(desc);
+
+out_mutex:
mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
out_thread:
@@ -1484,7 +1489,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
if (!desc->action) {
irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc);
irq_shutdown(desc);
- irq_release_resources(desc);
irq_remove_timings(desc);
}
@@ -1527,6 +1531,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
}
}
+ if (!desc->action)
+ irq_release_resources(desc);
+
mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data);