diff options
author | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2017-06-29 23:33:38 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2017-07-04 12:46:16 +0200 |
commit | 46e48e257360f0845fe17089713cbad4db611e70 (patch) | |
tree | bd2a904fb949d135cf8bd09964fe734a1d9138e1 /kernel/irq | |
parent | 9114014cf4e6df0b22d764380ae1fc54f1a7a8b2 (diff) | |
download | lwn-46e48e257360f0845fe17089713cbad4db611e70.tar.gz lwn-46e48e257360f0845fe17089713cbad4db611e70.zip |
genirq: Move irq resource handling out of spinlocked region
Aside of being conceptually wrong, there is also an actual (hard to
trigger and mostly theoretical) problem.
CPU0 CPU1
free_irq(X) interrupt X
spin_lock(desc->lock)
wake irq thread()
spin_unlock(desc->lock)
spin_lock(desc->lock)
remove action()
shutdown_irq()
release_resources() thread_handler()
spin_unlock(desc->lock) access released resources.
synchronize_irq()
Move the release resources invocation after synchronize_irq() so it's
guaranteed that the threaded handler has finished.
Move the resource request call out of the desc->lock held region as well,
so the invocation context is the same for both request and release.
This solves the problems with those functions on RT as well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170629214344.117028181@linutronix.de
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/irq')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/irq/manage.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index 0139908b8d53..3e693430bfe1 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -1168,6 +1168,14 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT; mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex); + if (!desc->action) { + ret = irq_request_resources(desc); + if (ret) { + pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n", + new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name); + goto out_mutex; + } + } chip_bus_lock(desc); @@ -1271,13 +1279,6 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new) } if (!shared) { - ret = irq_request_resources(desc); - if (ret) { - pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n", - new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name); - goto out_unlock; - } - init_waitqueue_head(&desc->wait_for_threads); /* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */ @@ -1386,6 +1387,10 @@ out_unlock: chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc); + if (!desc->action) + irq_release_resources(desc); + +out_mutex: mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex); out_thread: @@ -1484,7 +1489,6 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id) if (!desc->action) { irq_settings_clr_disable_unlazy(desc); irq_shutdown(desc); - irq_release_resources(desc); irq_remove_timings(desc); } @@ -1527,6 +1531,9 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id) } } + if (!desc->action) + irq_release_resources(desc); + mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex); irq_chip_pm_put(&desc->irq_data); |