diff options
| author | Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> | 2024-02-19 14:39:02 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> | 2024-02-20 09:51:21 +0100 |
| commit | bfacaf71a1482d936804213a3ffa6de73558280e (patch) | |
| tree | 43f893e7730b451843882be512c1a7e175938ad6 /fs/afs/server.c | |
| parent | e21a2f17566cbd64926fb8f16323972f7a064444 (diff) | |
| download | lwn-bfacaf71a1482d936804213a3ffa6de73558280e.tar.gz lwn-bfacaf71a1482d936804213a3ffa6de73558280e.zip | |
afs: Fix ignored callbacks over ipv4
When searching for a matching peer, all addresses need to be searched,
not just the ipv6 ones in the fs_addresses6 list.
Given that the lists no longer contain addresses, there is little
reason to splitting things between separate lists, so unify them
into a single list.
When processing an incoming callback from an ipv4 address, this would
lead to a failure to set call->server, resulting in the callback being
ignored and the client seeing stale contents.
Fixes: 72904d7b9bfb ("rxrpc, afs: Allow afs to pin rxrpc_peer objects")
Reported-by: Markus Suvanto <markus.suvanto@gmail.com>
Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-February/008035.html
Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-February/008037.html # v1
Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-February/008066.html # v2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240219143906.138346-2-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/afs/server.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/afs/server.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/fs/afs/server.c b/fs/afs/server.c index e169121f603e..038f9d0ae3af 100644 --- a/fs/afs/server.c +++ b/fs/afs/server.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct afs_server *afs_find_server(struct afs_net *net, const struct rxrpc_peer seq++; /* 2 on the 1st/lockless path, otherwise odd */ read_seqbegin_or_lock(&net->fs_addr_lock, &seq); - hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &net->fs_addresses6, addr6_link) { + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(server, &net->fs_addresses, addr_link) { estate = rcu_dereference(server->endpoint_state); alist = estate->addresses; for (i = 0; i < alist->nr_addrs; i++) @@ -177,10 +177,8 @@ added_dup: * bit, but anything we might want to do gets messy and memory * intensive. */ - if (alist->nr_ipv4 > 0) - hlist_add_head_rcu(&server->addr4_link, &net->fs_addresses4); - if (alist->nr_addrs > alist->nr_ipv4) - hlist_add_head_rcu(&server->addr6_link, &net->fs_addresses6); + if (alist->nr_addrs > 0) + hlist_add_head_rcu(&server->addr_link, &net->fs_addresses); write_sequnlock(&net->fs_addr_lock); @@ -511,10 +509,8 @@ static void afs_gc_servers(struct afs_net *net, struct afs_server *gc_list) list_del(&server->probe_link); hlist_del_rcu(&server->proc_link); - if (!hlist_unhashed(&server->addr4_link)) - hlist_del_rcu(&server->addr4_link); - if (!hlist_unhashed(&server->addr6_link)) - hlist_del_rcu(&server->addr6_link); + if (!hlist_unhashed(&server->addr_link)) + hlist_del_rcu(&server->addr_link); } write_sequnlock(&net->fs_lock); |