diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2018-12-17 10:14:53 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2019-01-21 11:15:36 +0100 |
commit | e6018c0f5c996e61639adce6a0697391a2861916 (patch) | |
tree | 280797731862759271bf6f2ec09813ae5527ffc7 | |
parent | 6dc080eeb2ba01973bfff0d79844d7a59e12542e (diff) | |
download | lwn-e6018c0f5c996e61639adce6a0697391a2861916.tar.gz lwn-e6018c0f5c996e61639adce6a0697391a2861916.zip |
sched/wake_q: Document wake_q_add()
The only guarantee provided by wake_q_add() is that a wakeup will
happen after it, it does _NOT_ guarantee the wakeup will be delayed
until the matching wake_up_q().
If wake_q_add() fails the cmpxchg() a concurrent wakeup is pending and
that can happen at any time after the cmpxchg(). This means we should
not rely on the wakeup happening at wake_q_up(), but should be ready
for wake_q_add() to issue the wakeup.
The delay; if provided (most likely); should only result in more efficient
behaviour.
Reported-by: Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/sched/wake_q.h | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 12 |
2 files changed, 17 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h b/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h index 10b19a192b2d..545f37138057 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/wake_q.h @@ -24,9 +24,13 @@ * called near the end of a function. Otherwise, the list can be * re-initialized for later re-use by wake_q_init(). * - * Note that this can cause spurious wakeups. schedule() callers + * NOTE that this can cause spurious wakeups. schedule() callers * must ensure the call is done inside a loop, confirming that the * wakeup condition has in fact occurred. + * + * NOTE that there is no guarantee the wakeup will happen any later than the + * wake_q_add() location. Therefore task must be ready to be woken at the + * location of the wake_q_add(). */ #include <linux/sched.h> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index a674c7db2f29..cc814933f7d6 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -396,6 +396,18 @@ static bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p) #endif #endif +/** + * wake_q_add() - queue a wakeup for 'later' waking. + * @head: the wake_q_head to add @task to + * @task: the task to queue for 'later' wakeup + * + * Queue a task for later wakeup, most likely by the wake_up_q() call in the + * same context, _HOWEVER_ this is not guaranteed, the wakeup can come + * instantly. + * + * This function must be used as-if it were wake_up_process(); IOW the task + * must be ready to be woken at this location. + */ void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task) { struct wake_q_node *node = &task->wake_q; |