diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2010-03-15 10:10:19 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2010-07-20 19:11:47 +0200 |
commit | a325588ec5c7384514a79f01ddebf274477eaf51 (patch) | |
tree | 03148648ace9a9c99cd5712891408de0a1b36272 | |
parent | 2d5a7c7241f20ee8e90452a47b773cffbb4c2412 (diff) | |
download | lwn-a325588ec5c7384514a79f01ddebf274477eaf51.tar.gz lwn-a325588ec5c7384514a79f01ddebf274477eaf51.zip |
sched: sched_exec(): Remove the select_fallback_rq() logic
sched_exec()->select_task_rq() reads/updates ->cpus_allowed lockless.
This can race with other CPUs updating our ->cpus_allowed, and this
looks meaningless to me.
The task is current and running, it must have online cpus in ->cpus_allowed,
the fallback mode is bogus. And, if ->sched_class returns the "wrong" cpu,
this likely means we raced with set_cpus_allowed() which was called
for reason, why should sched_exec() retry and call ->select_task_rq()
again?
Change the code to call sched_class->select_task_rq() directly and do
nothing if the returned cpu is wrong after re-checking under rq->lock.
From now task_struct->cpus_allowed is always stable under TASK_WAKING,
select_fallback_rq() is always called under rq-lock or the caller or
the caller owns TASK_WAKING (select_task_rq).
[ upstream commit: 30da688ef6b76e01969b00608202fff1eed2accc ]
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20100315091019.GA9141@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c index 95ffa5399479..d7a19eff34aa 100644 --- a/kernel/sched.c +++ b/kernel/sched.c @@ -2379,6 +2379,9 @@ void task_oncpu_function_call(struct task_struct *p, } #ifdef CONFIG_SMP +/* + * ->cpus_allowed is protected by either TASK_WAKING or rq->lock held. + */ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) { int dest_cpu; @@ -2415,12 +2418,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p) } /* - * Gets called from 3 sites (exec, fork, wakeup), since it is called without - * holding rq->lock we need to ensure ->cpus_allowed is stable, this is done - * by: - * - * exec: is unstable, retry loop - * fork & wake-up: serialize ->cpus_allowed against TASK_WAKING + * The caller (fork, wakeup) owns TASK_WAKING, ->cpus_allowed is stable. */ static inline int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags) @@ -3338,9 +3336,8 @@ void sched_exec(void) unsigned long flags; struct rq *rq; -again: this_cpu = get_cpu(); - dest_cpu = select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0); + dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0); if (dest_cpu == this_cpu) { put_cpu(); return; @@ -3348,18 +3345,12 @@ again: rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); put_cpu(); - /* * select_task_rq() can race against ->cpus_allowed */ - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) - || unlikely(!cpu_active(dest_cpu))) { - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); - goto again; - } - - /* force the process onto the specified CPU */ - if (migrate_task(p, dest_cpu, &req)) { + if (cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) && + likely(cpu_active(dest_cpu)) && + migrate_task(p, dest_cpu, &req)) { /* Need to wait for migration thread (might exit: take ref). */ struct task_struct *mt = rq->migration_thread; |