diff options
author | Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> | 2022-07-18 14:42:32 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 2022-07-19 19:10:28 +0100 |
commit | 9e26cac5f82b2cce43d98ffd8382ebd858fae7e8 (patch) | |
tree | 1524926b04aec9b541da81d36b127653ec274b27 | |
parent | 7eacf1858bc86fe93b457c529a3a40e8b94d5af1 (diff) | |
download | lwn-9e26cac5f82b2cce43d98ffd8382ebd858fae7e8.tar.gz lwn-9e26cac5f82b2cce43d98ffd8382ebd858fae7e8.zip |
arm64: numa: Don't check node against MAX_NUMNODES
When the NUMA nodes are sorted by checking ACPI SRAT (GICC AFFINITY)
sub-table, it's impossible for acpi_map_pxm_to_node() to return
any value, which is greater than or equal to MAX_NUMNODES. Lets drop
the unnecessary check in acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init().
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220718064232.3464373-1-gshan@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c index fdfecf0991ce..e51535a5f939 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa) pxm = pa->proximity_domain; node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm); - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node >= MAX_NUMNODES) { + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) { pr_err("SRAT: Too many proximity domains %d\n", pxm); bad_srat(); return; |