diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2022-10-26 13:43:00 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2022-11-14 09:58:32 +0100 |
commit | 91dabf33ae5df271da63e87ad7833e5fdb4a44b9 (patch) | |
tree | 86a1d62dca4c1172682dce3c8af7a5028dd34a00 | |
parent | 448dca8c88755b768552e19bd1618be34ef6d1ff (diff) | |
download | lwn-91dabf33ae5df271da63e87ad7833e5fdb4a44b9.tar.gz lwn-91dabf33ae5df271da63e87ad7833e5fdb4a44b9.zip |
sched: Fix race in task_call_func()
There is a very narrow race between schedule() and task_call_func().
CPU0 CPU1
__schedule()
rq_lock();
prev_state = READ_ONCE(prev->__state);
if (... && prev_state) {
deactivate_tasl(rq, prev, ...)
prev->on_rq = 0;
task_call_func()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(p->pi_lock);
state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
smp_rmb();
if (... || p->on_rq) // false!!!
rq = __task_rq_lock()
ret = func();
next = pick_next_task();
rq = context_switch(prev, next)
prepare_lock_switch()
spin_release(&__rq_lockp(rq)->dep_map...)
So while the task is on it's way out, it still holds rq->lock for a
little while, and right then task_call_func() comes in and figures it
doesn't need rq->lock anymore (because the task is already dequeued --
but still running there) and then the __set_task_frozen() thing observes
it's holding rq->lock and yells murder.
Avoid this by waiting for p->on_cpu to get cleared, which guarantees
the task is fully finished on the old CPU.
( While arguably the fixes tag is 'wrong' -- none of the previous
task_call_func() users appears to care for this case. )
Fixes: f5d39b020809 ("freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic")
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Y1kdRNNfUeAU+FNl@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 52 |
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index cb2aa2b54c7a..daff72f00385 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4200,6 +4200,40 @@ out: return success; } +static bool __task_needs_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p) +{ + unsigned int state = READ_ONCE(p->__state); + + /* + * Since pi->lock blocks try_to_wake_up(), we don't need rq->lock when + * the task is blocked. Make sure to check @state since ttwu() can drop + * locks at the end, see ttwu_queue_wakelist(). + */ + if (state == TASK_RUNNING || state == TASK_WAKING) + return true; + + /* + * Ensure we load p->on_rq after p->__state, otherwise it would be + * possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0. + * + * See try_to_wake_up() for a longer comment. + */ + smp_rmb(); + if (p->on_rq) + return true; + +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + /* + * Ensure the task has finished __schedule() and will not be referenced + * anymore. Again, see try_to_wake_up() for a longer comment. + */ + smp_rmb(); + smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL); +#endif + + return false; +} + /** * task_call_func - Invoke a function on task in fixed state * @p: Process for which the function is to be invoked, can be @current. @@ -4217,28 +4251,12 @@ out: int task_call_func(struct task_struct *p, task_call_f func, void *arg) { struct rq *rq = NULL; - unsigned int state; struct rq_flags rf; int ret; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags); - state = READ_ONCE(p->__state); - - /* - * Ensure we load p->on_rq after p->__state, otherwise it would be - * possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0. - * - * See try_to_wake_up() for a longer comment. - */ - smp_rmb(); - - /* - * Since pi->lock blocks try_to_wake_up(), we don't need rq->lock when - * the task is blocked. Make sure to check @state since ttwu() can drop - * locks at the end, see ttwu_queue_wakelist(). - */ - if (state == TASK_RUNNING || state == TASK_WAKING || p->on_rq) + if (__task_needs_rq_lock(p)) rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf); /* |