summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>2016-06-29 13:55:06 -0400
committerAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>2016-07-11 15:50:43 -0400
commit65b80179f9b8171b74625febf3457f41e792fa23 (patch)
tree91ed3dcb91c5bab4967ddfdf85132bb7b579a700
parent64695bde6c289a62250eb0a078916703c8cf639a (diff)
downloadlwn-65b80179f9b8171b74625febf3457f41e792fa23.tar.gz
lwn-65b80179f9b8171b74625febf3457f41e792fa23.zip
xprtrdma: No direct data placement with krb5i and krb5p
Direct data placement is not allowed when using flavors that guarantee integrity or privacy. When such security flavors are in effect, don't allow the use of Read and Write chunks for moving individual data items. All messages larger than the inline threshold are sent via Long Call or Long Reply. On my systems (CX-3 Pro on FDR), for small I/O operations, the use of Long messages adds only around 5 usecs of latency in each direction. Note that when integrity or encryption is used, the host CPU touches every byte in these messages. Even if it could be used, data movement offload doesn't buy much in this case. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-rw-r--r--include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h3
-rw-r--r--include/linux/sunrpc/gss_api.h2
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c2
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_mech.c2
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c12
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c12
6 files changed, 31 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h
index 899791573a40..3a40287b4d27 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ struct rpc_auth {
/* per-flavor data */
};
+/* rpc_auth au_flags */
+#define RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH 0x00000002
+
struct rpc_auth_create_args {
rpc_authflavor_t pseudoflavor;
const char *target_name;
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/gss_api.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/gss_api.h
index 1f911ccb2a75..68ec78c1aa48 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/gss_api.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/gss_api.h
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ u32 gss_delete_sec_context(
rpc_authflavor_t gss_svc_to_pseudoflavor(struct gss_api_mech *, u32 qop,
u32 service);
u32 gss_pseudoflavor_to_service(struct gss_api_mech *, u32 pseudoflavor);
+bool gss_pseudoflavor_to_datatouch(struct gss_api_mech *, u32 pseudoflavor);
char *gss_service_to_auth_domain_name(struct gss_api_mech *, u32 service);
struct pf_desc {
@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ struct pf_desc {
u32 service;
char *name;
char *auth_domain_name;
+ bool datatouch;
};
/* Different mechanisms (e.g., krb5 or spkm3) may implement gss-api, and
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
index e64ae93d5b4f..bca3537efffd 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/auth_gss.c
@@ -1017,6 +1017,8 @@ gss_create_new(struct rpc_auth_create_args *args, struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
auth->au_rslack = GSS_VERF_SLACK >> 2;
auth->au_ops = &authgss_ops;
auth->au_flavor = flavor;
+ if (gss_pseudoflavor_to_datatouch(gss_auth->mech, flavor))
+ auth->au_flags |= RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH;
atomic_set(&auth->au_count, 1);
kref_init(&gss_auth->kref);
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_mech.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_mech.c
index 65427492b1c9..60595835317a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_mech.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_mech.c
@@ -745,12 +745,14 @@ static struct pf_desc gss_kerberos_pfs[] = {
.qop = GSS_C_QOP_DEFAULT,
.service = RPC_GSS_SVC_INTEGRITY,
.name = "krb5i",
+ .datatouch = true,
},
[2] = {
.pseudoflavor = RPC_AUTH_GSS_KRB5P,
.qop = GSS_C_QOP_DEFAULT,
.service = RPC_GSS_SVC_PRIVACY,
.name = "krb5p",
+ .datatouch = true,
},
};
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c
index 7063d856a598..5fec3abbe19b 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c
@@ -361,6 +361,18 @@ gss_pseudoflavor_to_service(struct gss_api_mech *gm, u32 pseudoflavor)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gss_pseudoflavor_to_service);
+bool
+gss_pseudoflavor_to_datatouch(struct gss_api_mech *gm, u32 pseudoflavor)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < gm->gm_pf_num; i++) {
+ if (gm->gm_pfs[i].pseudoflavor == pseudoflavor)
+ return gm->gm_pfs[i].datatouch;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
char *
gss_service_to_auth_domain_name(struct gss_api_mech *gm, u32 service)
{
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
index dac2990ae2f7..a47f170b20ef 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
@@ -570,6 +570,7 @@ rpcrdma_marshal_req(struct rpc_rqst *rqst)
struct rpcrdma_req *req = rpcr_to_rdmar(rqst);
enum rpcrdma_chunktype rtype, wtype;
struct rpcrdma_msg *headerp;
+ bool ddp_allowed;
ssize_t hdrlen;
size_t rpclen;
__be32 *iptr;
@@ -586,6 +587,13 @@ rpcrdma_marshal_req(struct rpc_rqst *rqst)
headerp->rm_credit = cpu_to_be32(r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests);
headerp->rm_type = rdma_msg;
+ /* When the ULP employs a GSS flavor that guarantees integrity
+ * or privacy, direct data placement of individual data items
+ * is not allowed.
+ */
+ ddp_allowed = !(rqst->rq_cred->cr_auth->au_flags &
+ RPCAUTH_AUTH_DATATOUCH);
+
/*
* Chunks needed for results?
*
@@ -597,7 +605,7 @@ rpcrdma_marshal_req(struct rpc_rqst *rqst)
*/
if (rpcrdma_results_inline(r_xprt, rqst))
wtype = rpcrdma_noch;
- else if (rqst->rq_rcv_buf.flags & XDRBUF_READ)
+ else if (ddp_allowed && rqst->rq_rcv_buf.flags & XDRBUF_READ)
wtype = rpcrdma_writech;
else
wtype = rpcrdma_replych;
@@ -620,7 +628,7 @@ rpcrdma_marshal_req(struct rpc_rqst *rqst)
rtype = rpcrdma_noch;
rpcrdma_inline_pullup(rqst);
rpclen = rqst->rq_svec[0].iov_len;
- } else if (rqst->rq_snd_buf.flags & XDRBUF_WRITE) {
+ } else if (ddp_allowed && rqst->rq_snd_buf.flags & XDRBUF_WRITE) {
rtype = rpcrdma_readch;
rpclen = rqst->rq_svec[0].iov_len;
rpclen += rpcrdma_tail_pullup(&rqst->rq_snd_buf);