summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>2024-12-16 19:38:40 +0900
committerTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>2024-12-16 19:41:29 +0900
commit3df7546fc03b8f004eee0b9e3256369f7d096685 (patch)
tree94564a32dcd3a40fec843e9d9017792f2592c1c3
parent78d4f34e2115b517bcbfe7ec0d018bbbb6f9b0b8 (diff)
downloadlwn-3df7546fc03b8f004eee0b9e3256369f7d096685.tar.gz
lwn-3df7546fc03b8f004eee0b9e3256369f7d096685.zip
tomoyo: don't emit warning in tomoyo_write_control()
syzbot is reporting too large allocation warning at tomoyo_write_control(), for one can write a very very long line without new line character. To fix this warning, I use __GFP_NOWARN rather than checking for KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE, for practically a valid line should be always shorter than 32KB where the "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule applies. One might try to write a valid line that is longer than 32KB, but such request will likely fail with -ENOMEM. Therefore, I feel that separately returning -EINVAL when a line is longer than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE is redundant. There is no need to distinguish over-32KB and over-KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE. Reported-by: syzbot+7536f77535e5210a5c76@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7536f77535e5210a5c76 Reported-by: Leo Stone <leocstone@gmail.com> Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241216021459.178759-2-leocstone@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
-rw-r--r--security/tomoyo/common.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/security/tomoyo/common.c b/security/tomoyo/common.c
index 5c7b059a332a..972664962e8f 100644
--- a/security/tomoyo/common.c
+++ b/security/tomoyo/common.c
@@ -2665,7 +2665,7 @@ ssize_t tomoyo_write_control(struct tomoyo_io_buffer *head,
if (head->w.avail >= head->writebuf_size - 1) {
const int len = head->writebuf_size * 2;
- char *cp = kzalloc(len, GFP_NOFS);
+ char *cp = kzalloc(len, GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (!cp) {
error = -ENOMEM;