From 00db41243e8d5032c2e0f5bf6063bb19324bfdb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Morris Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 09:17:27 +0100 Subject: ipv4: coding style: comparison for inequality with NULL The ipv4 code uses a mixture of coding styles. In some instances check for non-NULL pointer is done as x != NULL and sometimes as x. x is preferred according to checkpatch and this patch makes the code consistent by adopting the latter form. No changes detected by objdiff. Signed-off-by: Ian Morris Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/udp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/ipv4/udp.c') diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c index 9f525a2a68df..2162fc6ce1c1 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c @@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) /* if we're overly short, let UDP handle it */ encap_rcv = ACCESS_ONCE(up->encap_rcv); - if (skb->len > sizeof(struct udphdr) && encap_rcv != NULL) { + if (skb->len > sizeof(struct udphdr) && encap_rcv) { int ret; /* Verify checksum before giving to encap */ @@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ int __udp4_lib_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct udp_table *udptable, saddr, daddr, udptable, proto); sk = __udp4_lib_lookup_skb(skb, uh->source, uh->dest, udptable); - if (sk != NULL) { + if (sk) { int ret; if (inet_get_convert_csum(sk) && uh->check && !IS_UDPLITE(sk)) -- cgit v1.2.3