From c272612cb4a2f7cde550d35f46cde159a2af0bab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Gow Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 16:47:43 +0800 Subject: kunit: Taint the kernel when KUnit tests are run MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Make KUnit trigger the new TAINT_TEST taint when any KUnit test is run. Due to KUnit tests not being intended to run on production systems, and potentially causing problems (or security issues like leaking kernel addresses), the kernel's state should not be considered safe for production use after KUnit tests are run. This both marks KUnit modules as test modules using MODULE_INFO() and manually taints the kernel when tests are run (which catches builtin tests). Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain Tested-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: David Gow Tested-by: Maíra Canal Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/kunit/test.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index a5053a07409f..8b11552dc215 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -501,6 +502,9 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) struct kunit_result_stats suite_stats = { 0 }; struct kunit_result_stats total_stats = { 0 }; + /* Taint the kernel so we know we've run tests. */ + add_taint(TAINT_TEST, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); + if (suite->suite_init) { suite->suite_init_err = suite->suite_init(suite); if (suite->suite_init_err) { -- cgit v1.2.3 From d2fbdde838f270377de4fc20e919aac3941ea55f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Latypov Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 09:54:46 -0700 Subject: kunit: use kmemdup in kunit_filter_tests(), take suite as const kmemdup() is easier than kmalloc() + memcpy(), per lkp bot. Also make the input `suite` as const since we're now always making copies after commit a127b154a8f2 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob"). Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 96f96e42ce06..572f64e0a41a 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static void kunit_parse_filter_glob(struct kunit_test_filter *parsed, /* Create a copy of suite with only tests that match test_glob. */ static struct kunit_suite * -kunit_filter_tests(struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob) +kunit_filter_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob) { int n = 0; struct kunit_case *filtered, *test_case; @@ -69,11 +69,9 @@ kunit_filter_tests(struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob) if (n == 0) return NULL; - /* Use memcpy to workaround copy->name being const. */ - copy = kmalloc(sizeof(*copy), GFP_KERNEL); + copy = kmemdup(suite, sizeof(*copy), GFP_KERNEL); if (!copy) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - memcpy(copy, suite, sizeof(*copy)); filtered = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL); if (!filtered) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 3d6e44623841c8b82c2157f2f749019803fb238a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Kerr Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 11:19:57 +0800 Subject: kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Currently, KUnit runs built-in tests and tests loaded from modules differently. For built-in tests, the kunit_test_suite{,s}() macro adds a list of suites in the .kunit_test_suites linker section. However, for kernel modules, a module_init() function is used to run the test suites. This causes problems if tests are included in a module which already defines module_init/exit_module functions, as they'll conflict with the kunit-provided ones. This change removes the kunit-defined module inits, and instead parses the kunit tests from their own section in the module. After module init, we call __kunit_test_suites_init() on the contents of that section, which prepares and runs the suite. This essentially unifies the module- and non-module kunit init formats. Tested-by: Maíra Canal Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Signed-off-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- include/kunit/test.h | 49 ++++++----------------------------------------- include/linux/module.h | 5 +++++ kernel/module/main.c | 6 ++++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 7646d1bcf685..cb155d3da284 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -250,42 +250,9 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) } #endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */ -#ifdef MODULE -/** - * kunit_test_suites_for_module() - used to register one or more - * &struct kunit_suite with KUnit. - * - * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. - * - * Registers @__suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for - * more information. - * - * If a test suite is built-in, module_init() gets translated into - * an initcall which we don't want as the idea is that for builtins - * the executor will manage execution. So ensure we do not define - * module_{init|exit} functions for the builtin case when registering - * suites via kunit_test_suites() below. - */ -#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) \ - static int __init kunit_test_suites_init(void) \ - { \ - return __kunit_test_suites_init(__suites); \ - } \ - module_init(kunit_test_suites_init); \ - \ - static void __exit kunit_test_suites_exit(void) \ - { \ - return __kunit_test_suites_exit(__suites); \ - } \ - module_exit(kunit_test_suites_exit) \ - MODULE_INFO(test, "Y"); -#else -#define kunit_test_suites_for_module(__suites) -#endif /* MODULE */ - #define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...) \ + MODULE_INFO(test, "Y"); \ static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL }; \ - kunit_test_suites_for_module(unique_array); \ static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites \ __used __section(".kunit_test_suites") = unique_array @@ -295,16 +262,12 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) * * @__suites: a statically allocated list of &struct kunit_suite. * - * Registers @suites with the test framework. See &struct kunit_suite for - * more information. - * - * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via executor; this is done - * by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the .kunit_test_suites - * ELF section. + * Registers @suites with the test framework. + * This is done by placing the array of struct kunit_suite * in the + * .kunit_test_suites ELF section. * - * An alternative is to build the tests as a module. Because modules do not - * support multiple initcall()s, we need to initialize an array of suites for a - * module. + * When builtin, KUnit tests are all run via the executor at boot, and when + * built as a module, they run on module load. * */ #define kunit_test_suites(__suites...) \ diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index abd9fa916b7d..2490223c975d 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -505,6 +505,11 @@ struct module { int num_static_call_sites; struct static_call_site *static_call_sites; #endif +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT) + int num_kunit_suites; + struct kunit_suite ***kunit_suites; +#endif + #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH bool klp; /* Is this a livepatch module? */ diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c index 4723f1316709..324a770f789c 100644 --- a/kernel/module/main.c +++ b/kernel/module/main.c @@ -2094,6 +2094,12 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info) sizeof(*mod->static_call_sites), &mod->num_static_call_sites); #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT + mod->kunit_suites = section_objs(info, ".kunit_test_suites", + sizeof(*mod->kunit_suites), + &mod->num_kunit_suites); +#endif + mod->extable = section_objs(info, "__ex_table", sizeof(*mod->extable), &mod->num_exentries); diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 8b11552dc215..246645eb3cef 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -613,6 +614,49 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit); +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES +static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod) +{ + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++) + __kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites[i]); +} + +static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod) +{ + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++) + __kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites[i]); +} + +static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, + void *data) +{ + struct module *mod = data; + + switch (val) { + case MODULE_STATE_LIVE: + kunit_module_init(mod); + break; + case MODULE_STATE_GOING: + kunit_module_exit(mod); + break; + case MODULE_STATE_COMING: + case MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED: + break; + } + + return 0; +} + +static struct notifier_block kunit_mod_nb = { + .notifier_call = kunit_module_notify, + .priority = 0, +}; +#endif + struct kunit_kmalloc_array_params { size_t n; size_t size; @@ -707,13 +751,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_cleanup); static int __init kunit_init(void) { kunit_debugfs_init(); - +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES + return register_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb); +#else return 0; +#endif } late_initcall(kunit_init); static void __exit kunit_exit(void) { +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES + unregister_module_notifier(&kunit_mod_nb); +#endif kunit_debugfs_cleanup(); } module_exit(kunit_exit); -- cgit v1.2.3 From e5857d396f35e59e6fe96cf1178b0357cc3a1ea4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Latypov Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2022 11:19:58 +0800 Subject: kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We currently store kunit suites in the .kunit_test_suites ELF section as a `struct kunit_suite***` (modulo some `const`s). For every test file, we store a struct kunit_suite** NULL-terminated array. This adds quite a bit of complexity to the test filtering code in the executor. Instead, let's just make the .kunit_test_suites section contain a single giant array of struct kunit_suite pointers, which can then be directly manipulated. This array is not NULL-terminated, and so none of the test filtering code needs to NULL-terminate anything. Tested-by: Maíra Canal Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Co-developed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- include/kunit/test.h | 13 ++--- include/linux/module.h | 2 +- lib/kunit/executor.c | 115 +++++++++--------------------------- lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 144 +++++++++++++--------------------------------- lib/kunit/test.c | 18 ++---- 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index cb155d3da284..c958855681cc 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -237,9 +237,9 @@ size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite); unsigned int kunit_test_case_num(struct kunit_suite *suite, struct kunit_case *test_case); -int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites); +int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_suites); -void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites); +void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites); #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) int kunit_run_all_tests(void); @@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) } #endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */ -#define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, unique_suites, ...) \ +#define __kunit_test_suites(unique_array, ...) \ MODULE_INFO(test, "Y"); \ - static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] = { __VA_ARGS__, NULL }; \ - static struct kunit_suite **unique_suites \ - __used __section(".kunit_test_suites") = unique_array + static struct kunit_suite *unique_array[] \ + __aligned(sizeof(struct kunit_suite *)) \ + __used __section(".kunit_test_suites") = { __VA_ARGS__ } /** * kunit_test_suites() - used to register one or more &struct kunit_suite @@ -272,7 +272,6 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) */ #define kunit_test_suites(__suites...) \ __kunit_test_suites(__UNIQUE_ID(array), \ - __UNIQUE_ID(suites), \ ##__suites) #define kunit_test_suite(suite) kunit_test_suites(&suite) diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h index 2490223c975d..518296ea7f73 100644 --- a/include/linux/module.h +++ b/include/linux/module.h @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ struct module { #endif #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT) int num_kunit_suites; - struct kunit_suite ***kunit_suites; + struct kunit_suite **kunit_suites; #endif diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 572f64e0a41a..6c489d6c5e5d 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in * include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h, and consequently must be extern. */ -extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_start[]; -extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[]; +extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_suites_start[]; +extern struct kunit_suite * const __kunit_suites_end[]; #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) @@ -90,62 +90,18 @@ kunit_filter_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob) static char *kunit_shutdown; core_param(kunit_shutdown, kunit_shutdown, charp, 0644); -static struct kunit_suite * const * -kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite, - struct kunit_test_filter *filter) -{ - int i, n = 0; - struct kunit_suite **filtered, *filtered_suite; - - n = 0; - for (i = 0; subsuite[i]; ++i) { - if (glob_match(filter->suite_glob, subsuite[i]->name)) - ++n; - } - - if (n == 0) - return NULL; - - filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!filtered) - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - - n = 0; - for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) { - if (!glob_match(filter->suite_glob, subsuite[i]->name)) - continue; - filtered_suite = kunit_filter_tests(subsuite[i], filter->test_glob); - if (IS_ERR(filtered_suite)) - return ERR_CAST(filtered_suite); - else if (filtered_suite) - filtered[n++] = filtered_suite; - } - filtered[n] = NULL; - - return filtered; -} - +/* Stores an array of suites, end points one past the end */ struct suite_set { - struct kunit_suite * const * const *start; - struct kunit_suite * const * const *end; + struct kunit_suite * const *start; + struct kunit_suite * const *end; }; -static void kunit_free_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const *subsuite) -{ - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; subsuite[i]; i++) - kfree(subsuite[i]); - - kfree(subsuite); -} - static void kunit_free_suite_set(struct suite_set suite_set) { - struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites; + struct kunit_suite * const *suites; for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) - kunit_free_subsuite(*suites); + kfree(*suites); kfree(suite_set.start); } @@ -154,7 +110,7 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, int *err) { int i; - struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite; + struct kunit_suite **copy, *filtered_suite; struct suite_set filtered; struct kunit_test_filter filter; @@ -169,14 +125,19 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set, kunit_parse_filter_glob(&filter, filter_glob); - for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) { - filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(suite_set->start[i], &filter); - if (IS_ERR(filtered_subsuite)) { - *err = PTR_ERR(filtered_subsuite); + for (i = 0; &suite_set->start[i] != suite_set->end; i++) { + if (!glob_match(filter.suite_glob, suite_set->start[i]->name)) + continue; + + filtered_suite = kunit_filter_tests(suite_set->start[i], filter.test_glob); + if (IS_ERR(filtered_suite)) { + *err = PTR_ERR(filtered_suite); return filtered; } - if (filtered_subsuite) - *copy++ = filtered_subsuite; + if (!filtered_suite) + continue; + + *copy++ = filtered_suite; } filtered.end = copy; @@ -199,52 +160,33 @@ static void kunit_handle_shutdown(void) } -static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set) -{ - struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite; - int num_of_suites = 0; - - for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) - for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++) - num_of_suites++; - - pr_info("TAP version 14\n"); - pr_info("1..%d\n", num_of_suites); -} - static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) { - struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites; + size_t num_suites = suite_set->end - suite_set->start; - kunit_print_tap_header(suite_set); + pr_info("TAP version 14\n"); + pr_info("1..%zu\n", num_suites); - for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) - __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites); + __kunit_test_suites_init(suite_set->start, num_suites); } static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) { - unsigned int i; - struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites; + struct kunit_suite * const *suites; struct kunit_case *test_case; /* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */ pr_info("TAP version 14\n"); for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) - for (i = 0; (*suites)[i] != NULL; i++) { - kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites)[i], test_case) { - pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)[i]->name, test_case->name); - } + kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) { + pr_info("%s.%s\n", (*suites)->name, test_case->name); } } int kunit_run_all_tests(void) { - struct suite_set suite_set = { - .start = __kunit_suites_start, - .end = __kunit_suites_end, - }; + struct suite_set suite_set = {__kunit_suites_start, __kunit_suites_end}; int err = 0; if (filter_glob_param) { @@ -262,11 +204,10 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void) else pr_err("kunit executor: unknown action '%s'\n", action_param); - if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each array */ + if (filter_glob_param) { /* a copy was made of each suite */ kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set); } - out: kunit_handle_shutdown(); return err; diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c index eac6ff480273..0cea31c27b23 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c @@ -9,8 +9,6 @@ #include static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free); -static void free_subsuite_at_end(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_suite *const *to_free); static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test, const char *suite_name, struct kunit_case *test_cases); @@ -41,126 +39,80 @@ static void parse_filter_test(struct kunit *test) kfree(filter.test_glob); } -static void filter_subsuite_test(struct kunit *test) +static void filter_suites_test(struct kunit *test) { - struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL}; - struct kunit_suite * const *filtered; - struct kunit_test_filter filter = { - .suite_glob = "suite2", - .test_glob = NULL, - }; + struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL}; + struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; + struct suite_set got; + int err = 0; subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases); subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite2", dummy_test_cases); /* Want: suite1, suite2, NULL -> suite2, NULL */ - filtered = kunit_filter_subsuite(subsuite, &filter); - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered); - free_subsuite_at_end(test, filtered); + got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", &err); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); + kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* Validate we just have suite2 */ - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered[0]); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered[0]->name, "suite2"); - KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, filtered[1]); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)got.start[0]->name, "suite2"); + + /* Contains one element (end is 1 past end) */ + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, got.end - got.start, 1); } -static void filter_subsuite_test_glob_test(struct kunit *test) +static void filter_suites_test_glob_test(struct kunit *test) { - struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL}; - struct kunit_suite * const *filtered; - struct kunit_test_filter filter = { - .suite_glob = "suite2", - .test_glob = "test2", - }; + struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL}; + struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; + struct suite_set got; + int err = 0; subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases); subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite2", dummy_test_cases); /* Want: suite1, suite2, NULL -> suite2 (just test1), NULL */ - filtered = kunit_filter_subsuite(subsuite, &filter); - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered); - free_subsuite_at_end(test, filtered); + got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2.test2", &err); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); + kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* Validate we just have suite2 */ - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered[0]); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered[0]->name, "suite2"); - KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, filtered[1]); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)got.start[0]->name, "suite2"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, got.end - got.start, 1); /* Now validate we just have test2 */ - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered[0]->test_cases); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered[0]->test_cases[0].name, "test2"); - KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, filtered[0]->test_cases[1].name); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, got.start[0]->test_cases); + KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)got.start[0]->test_cases[0].name, "test2"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, got.start[0]->test_cases[1].name); } -static void filter_subsuite_to_empty_test(struct kunit *test) +static void filter_suites_to_empty_test(struct kunit *test) { - struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL, NULL}; - struct kunit_suite * const *filtered; - struct kunit_test_filter filter = { - .suite_glob = "not_found", - .test_glob = NULL, - }; + struct kunit_suite *subsuite[3] = {NULL, NULL}; + struct suite_set suite_set = {.start = subsuite, .end = &subsuite[2]}; + struct suite_set got; + int err = 0; subsuite[0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases); subsuite[1] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite2", dummy_test_cases); - filtered = kunit_filter_subsuite(subsuite, &filter); - free_subsuite_at_end(test, filtered); /* just in case */ + got = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "not_found", &err); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, err, 0); + kfree_at_end(test, got.start); /* just in case */ - KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, filtered, - "should be NULL to indicate no match"); -} - -static void kfree_subsuites_at_end(struct kunit *test, struct suite_set *suite_set) -{ - struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites; - - kfree_at_end(test, suite_set->start); - for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) - free_subsuite_at_end(test, *suites); -} - -static void filter_suites_test(struct kunit *test) -{ - /* Suites per-file are stored as a NULL terminated array */ - struct kunit_suite *subsuites[2][2] = { - {NULL, NULL}, - {NULL, NULL}, - }; - /* Match the memory layout of suite_set */ - struct kunit_suite * const * const suites[2] = { - subsuites[0], subsuites[1], - }; - - const struct suite_set suite_set = { - .start = suites, - .end = suites + 2, - }; - struct suite_set filtered = {.start = NULL, .end = NULL}; - int err = 0; - - /* Emulate two files, each having one suite */ - subsuites[0][0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite0", dummy_test_cases); - subsuites[1][0] = alloc_fake_suite(test, "suite1", dummy_test_cases); - - /* Filter out suite1 */ - filtered = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite0", &err); - kfree_subsuites_at_end(test, &filtered); /* let us use ASSERTs without leaking */ - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, err, 0); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, filtered.end - filtered.start, (ptrdiff_t)1); - - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered.start); - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered.start[0]); - KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, filtered.start[0][0]); - KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered.start[0][0]->name, "suite0"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, got.start, got.end, + "should be empty to indicate no match"); } static struct kunit_case executor_test_cases[] = { KUNIT_CASE(parse_filter_test), - KUNIT_CASE(filter_subsuite_test), - KUNIT_CASE(filter_subsuite_test_glob_test), - KUNIT_CASE(filter_subsuite_to_empty_test), KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_test), + KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_test_glob_test), + KUNIT_CASE(filter_suites_to_empty_test), {} }; @@ -190,20 +142,6 @@ static void kfree_at_end(struct kunit *test, const void *to_free) (void *)to_free); } -static void free_subsuite_res_free(struct kunit_resource *res) -{ - kunit_free_subsuite(res->data); -} - -static void free_subsuite_at_end(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_suite *const *to_free) -{ - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(to_free)) - return; - kunit_alloc_resource(test, NULL, free_subsuite_res_free, - GFP_KERNEL, (void *)to_free); -} - static struct kunit_suite *alloc_fake_suite(struct kunit *test, const char *suite_name, struct kunit_case *test_cases) diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 246645eb3cef..b73d5bb5c473 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -586,11 +586,11 @@ static void kunit_init_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) suite->suite_init_err = 0; } -int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites) +int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_suites) { unsigned int i; - for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) { kunit_init_suite(suites[i]); kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); } @@ -603,11 +603,11 @@ static void kunit_exit_suite(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_debugfs_destroy_suite(suite); } -void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites) +void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites) { unsigned int i; - for (i = 0; suites[i] != NULL; i++) + for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) kunit_exit_suite(suites[i]); kunit_suite_counter = 1; @@ -617,18 +617,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit); #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES static void kunit_module_init(struct module *mod) { - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++) - __kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites[i]); + __kunit_test_suites_init(mod->kunit_suites, mod->num_kunit_suites); } static void kunit_module_exit(struct module *mod) { - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; i < mod->num_kunit_suites; i++) - __kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites[i]); + __kunit_test_suites_exit(mod->kunit_suites, mod->num_kunit_suites); } static int kunit_module_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, -- cgit v1.2.3 From 94681e289bf5d10c9db9db143d1a22d8717205c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Gow Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 07:25:27 +0800 Subject: kunit: executor: Fix a memory leak on failure in kunit_filter_tests It's possible that memory allocation for 'filtered' will fail, but for the copy of the suite to succeed. In this case, the copy could be leaked. Properly free 'copy' in the error case for the allocation of 'filtered' failing. Note that there may also have been a similar issue in kunit_filter_subsuites, before it was removed in "kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites". This was reported by clang-analyzer via the kernel test robot, here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c8073b8e-7b9e-0830-4177-87c12f16349c@intel.com/ And by smatch via Dan Carpenter and the kernel test robot: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202207101328.ASjx88yj-lkp@intel.com/ Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 6c489d6c5e5d..5e223327196a 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -74,8 +74,10 @@ kunit_filter_tests(const struct kunit_suite *const suite, const char *test_glob) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); filtered = kcalloc(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!filtered) + if (!filtered) { + kfree(copy); return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + } n = 0; kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) { -- cgit v1.2.3