From 6cfd0148425e528b859b26e436b01f23f6926224 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:40:36 +0200 Subject: push BKL down into ->put_super Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller. A couple of filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs, hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment. Most of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually. Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area. [AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super() now] [AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ubifs/super.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/ubifs') diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c index 84f3c7fd1552..522c3fd7eb3c 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c @@ -1684,6 +1684,9 @@ static void ubifs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) ubifs_msg("un-mount UBI device %d, volume %d", c->vi.ubi_num, c->vi.vol_id); + + lock_kernel(); + /* * The following asserts are only valid if there has not been a failure * of the media. For example, there will be dirty inodes if we failed @@ -1750,6 +1753,8 @@ static void ubifs_put_super(struct super_block *sb) ubi_close_volume(c->ubi); mutex_unlock(&c->umount_mutex); kfree(c); + + unlock_kernel(); } static int ubifs_remount_fs(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) -- cgit v1.2.3