From e6305c43eda10ebfd2ad9e35d6e172ccc7bb3695 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:03:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] sanitize ->permission() prototype
* kill nameidata * argument; map the 3 bits in ->flags anybody cares
about to new MAY_... ones and pass with the mask.
* kill redundant gfs2_iop_permission()
* sanitize ecryptfs_permission()
* fix remaining places where ->permission() instances might barf on new
MAY_... found in mask.
The obvious next target in that direction is permission(9)
folded fix for nfs_permission() breakage from Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 3 +--
fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
(limited to 'fs/proc')
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 81bce6791bfc..d82d800389f6 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1859,8 +1859,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_fd_operations = {
* /proc/pid/fd needs a special permission handler so that a process can still
* access /proc/self/fd after it has executed a setuid().
*/
-static int proc_fd_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask,
- struct nameidata *nd)
+static int proc_fd_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
int rv;
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index fa1ec2433e44..f9a8b892718f 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-static int proc_sys_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask, struct nameidata *nd)
+static int proc_sys_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
/*
* sysctl entries that are not writeable,
--
cgit v1.2.3