From 24bcc89c7e7c64982e6192b4952a0a92379fc341 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:41:04 -0400 Subject: jbd2: split updating of journal superblock and marking journal empty There are three case of updating journal superblock. In the first case, we want to mark journal as empty (setting s_sequence to 0), in the second case we want to update log tail, in the third case we want to update s_errno. Split these cases into separate functions. It makes the code slightly more straightforward and later patches will make the distinction even more important. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" --- fs/jbd2/commit.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/jbd2/commit.c') diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c index 8adc5d460f56..19371a8a9015 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal) /* Do we need to erase the effects of a prior jbd2_journal_flush? */ if (journal->j_flags & JBD2_FLUSHED) { jbd_debug(3, "super block updated\n"); - jbd2_journal_update_superblock(journal, 1); + jbd2_journal_update_sb_log_tail(journal); } else { jbd_debug(3, "superblock not updated\n"); } -- cgit v1.2.3