From e2728c5621fd9c68c65a6647875a1d1c67b9f257 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Biggers Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:02:47 -0800 Subject: fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates There is no need to call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates (i.e. for __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_TIME)), since by the definition of lazytime, filesystems must ignore these updates. Filesystems only need to care about the updated timestamps when they expire. Therefore, only call ->dirty_inode when I_DIRTY_INODE is set. Based on a patch from Christoph Hellwig: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200325122825.1086872-4-hch@lst.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210112190253.64307-6-ebiggers@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/f2fs') diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c index b4a07fe62d1a..cc98dc49f4a2 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c @@ -1196,9 +1196,6 @@ static void f2fs_dirty_inode(struct inode *inode, int flags) inode->i_ino == F2FS_META_INO(sbi)) return; - if (flags == I_DIRTY_TIME) - return; - if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_AUTO_RECOVER)) clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_AUTO_RECOVER); -- cgit v1.2.3