From 426a930891cf17c5c16f12e8e2c8cb75c4cfff3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gao Xiang Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 10:08:53 +0800 Subject: erofs: use feature_incompat rather than requirements As Christoph said [1], "This is only cosmetic, why not stick to feature_compat and feature_incompat?" In my thought, requirements means "incompatible" instead of "feature" though. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/ Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-7-gaoxiang25@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/erofs/internal.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/erofs/internal.h') diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h index 141ea424587d..7ff36f404ec3 100644 --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ struct erofs_sb_info { u8 uuid[16]; /* 128-bit uuid for volume */ u8 volume_name[16]; /* volume name */ - u32 requirements; + u32 feature_incompat; unsigned int mount_opt; -- cgit v1.2.3