From ac5887c8e013d6754d36e6d51dc03448ee0b0065 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josef Bacik Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:46:10 -0400 Subject: btrfs: locking: remove all the blocking helpers Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from blocking to spinning. Remove these helpers and all the places they are called. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/qgroup.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 87bd37b70738..9e97d3172a24 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -1970,8 +1970,7 @@ static int qgroup_trace_extent_swap(struct btrfs_trans_handle* trans, src_path->nodes[cur_level] = eb; btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb); - btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(eb); - src_path->locks[cur_level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING; + src_path->locks[cur_level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK; } src_path->slots[cur_level] = dst_path->slots[cur_level]; @@ -2111,8 +2110,7 @@ static int qgroup_trace_new_subtree_blocks(struct btrfs_trans_handle* trans, dst_path->slots[cur_level] = 0; btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb); - btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(eb); - dst_path->locks[cur_level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING; + dst_path->locks[cur_level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK; need_cleanup = true; } @@ -2286,8 +2284,7 @@ walk_down: path->slots[level] = 0; btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb); - btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(eb); - path->locks[level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING; + path->locks[level] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK; ret = btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent(trans, child_bytenr, fs_info->nodesize, -- cgit v1.2.3