From 093258e6ebaf178bb25da514f0d1f744968cc900 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Sterba Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:15:17 +0100 Subject: btrfs: replace waitqueue_actvie with cond_wake_up Use the wrappers and reduce the amount of low-level details about the waitqueue management. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/locking.c | 34 +++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/btrfs/locking.c') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c index e4faefac9d16..1da768e5ef75 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c @@ -66,22 +66,16 @@ void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw) write_lock(&eb->lock); WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_writers); - /* - * atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier for waitqueue_active - */ - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_writers) && - waitqueue_active(&eb->write_lock_wq)) - wake_up(&eb->write_lock_wq); + /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_writers)) + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq); } else if (rw == BTRFS_READ_LOCK_BLOCKING) { BUG_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0); read_lock(&eb->lock); atomic_inc(&eb->spinning_readers); - /* - * atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier for waitqueue_active - */ - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers) && - waitqueue_active(&eb->read_lock_wq)) - wake_up(&eb->read_lock_wq); + /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers)) + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->read_lock_wq); } } @@ -221,12 +215,9 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb) } btrfs_assert_tree_read_locked(eb); WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->blocking_readers) == 0); - /* - * atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier for waitqueue_active - */ - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers) && - waitqueue_active(&eb->read_lock_wq)) - wake_up(&eb->read_lock_wq); + /* atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&eb->blocking_readers)) + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->read_lock_wq); atomic_dec(&eb->read_locks); } @@ -275,12 +266,9 @@ void btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb) if (blockers) { WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers)); atomic_dec(&eb->blocking_writers); - /* - * Make sure counter is updated before we wake up waiters. - */ + /* Use the lighter barrier after atomic */ smp_mb__after_atomic(); - if (waitqueue_active(&eb->write_lock_wq)) - wake_up(&eb->write_lock_wq); + cond_wake_up_nomb(&eb->write_lock_wq); } else { WARN_ON(atomic_read(&eb->spinning_writers) != 1); atomic_dec(&eb->spinning_writers); -- cgit v1.2.3