From e1dc5007cf51a0a5d2e6ca6d0c81d1c987b0ac77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:43:31 -0400
Subject: microblaze: ftrace: Add call to ftrace_graph_is_dead() in function
 graph code

ftrace_stop() is going away as it disables parts of function tracing
that affects users that should not be affected. But ftrace_graph_stop()
is built on ftrace_stop(). Here's another example of killing all of
function tracing because something went wrong with function graph
tracing.

Instead of disabling all users of function tracing on function graph
error, disable only function graph tracing. To do this, the arch code
must call ftrace_graph_is_dead() before it implements function graph.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/53C8D874.9090601@monstr.eu

Tested-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 arch/microblaze/kernel/ftrace.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

(limited to 'arch/microblaze')

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/ftrace.c
index bbcd2533766c..fc7b48a52cd5 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long *parent, unsigned long self_addr)
 	unsigned long return_hooker = (unsigned long)
 				&return_to_handler;
 
+	if (unlikely(ftrace_graph_is_dead()))
+		return;
+
 	if (unlikely(atomic_read(&current->tracing_graph_pause)))
 		return;
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3