From e0feed08ab41df0fedc38d35938891ef5715c1d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:47:56 +0200 Subject: mm/list_lru.c: Rename kvfree_rcu() to local variant Rename kvfree_rcu() function to the kvfree_rcu_local() one. The purpose is to prevent a conflict of two same function declarations. The kvfree_rcu() will be globally visible what would lead to a build error. No functional change. Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- mm/list_lru.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c index 9222910ab1cb..e825804b3928 100644 --- a/mm/list_lru.c +++ b/mm/list_lru.c @@ -373,14 +373,14 @@ static void memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; /* * This is called when shrinker has already been unregistered, - * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu(). + * and nobody can use it. So, there is no need to use kvfree_rcu_local(). */ memcg_lrus = rcu_dereference_protected(nlru->memcg_lrus, true); __memcg_destroy_list_lru_node(memcg_lrus, 0, memcg_nr_cache_ids); kvfree(memcg_lrus); } -static void kvfree_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +static void kvfree_rcu_local(struct rcu_head *head) { struct list_lru_memcg *mlru; @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int memcg_update_list_lru_node(struct list_lru_node *nlru, rcu_assign_pointer(nlru->memcg_lrus, new); spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock); - call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu); + call_rcu(&old->rcu, kvfree_rcu_local); return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3