summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-11-07posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftoversThomas Gleixner
Now that ignored posix timer signals are requeued and the timers are rearmed on signal delivery the workaround to keep such timers alive and self rearm them is not longer required. Remove the relevant hacks and the not longer required return values from the related functions. The alarm timer workarounds will be cleaned up in a separate step. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.187239060@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleepThomas Gleixner
POSIX CPU timer nanosleep creates a k_itimer on stack and uses the sigq pointer to detect the nanosleep case in the expiry function. Prepare for embedding sigqueue into struct k_itimer by using a dedicated flag for nanosleep. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.238550394@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logicThomas Gleixner
The firing flag of a posix CPU timer is tristate: 0: when the timer is not about to deliver a signal 1: when the timer has expired, but the signal has not been delivered yet -1: when the timer was queued for signal delivery and a rearm operation raced against it and supressed the signal delivery. This is a pointless exercise as this can be simply expressed with a boolean. Only if set, the signal is delivered. This makes delete and rearm consistent with the rest of the posix timers. Convert firing to bool and fixup the usage sites accordingly and add comments why the timer cannot be dequeued right away. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.172848618@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistentThomas Gleixner
Signals of timers which are reprogammed, disarmed or deleted can deliver signals related to the past. The POSIX spec is blury about this: - "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration notifications is unspecified." - "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is unspecified." In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has been disarmed. This makes the behaviour consistent and understandable. Remove the si_sys_private check from the signal delivery code and invoke posix_timer_deliver_signal() unconditionally for posix timer related signals. Change posix_timer_deliver_signal() so it controls the actual signal delivery via the return value. It now instructs the signal code to drop the signal when: 1) The timer does not longer exist in the hash table 2) The timer signal_seq value is not the same as the si_sys_private value which was set when the signal was queued. This is also a preparatory change to embed the sigqueue into the k_itimer structure, which in turn allows to remove the si_sys_private magic. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.040348644@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-cpu-timers: Correctly update timer status in posix_cpu_timer_del()Thomas Gleixner
If posix_cpu_timer_del() exits early due to task not found or sighand invalid, it fails to clear the state of the timer. That's harmless but inconsistent. These early exits are accounted as successful delete. Move the update of the timer state into the success return path, so all "successful" deletions are handled. Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064212.974053438@linutronix.de
2024-10-29posix-timers: Add proper state trackingThomas Gleixner
Right now the state tracking is done by two struct members: - it_active: A boolean which tracks armed/disarmed state - it_signal_seq: A sequence counter which is used to invalidate settings and prevent rearming Replace it_active with it_status and keep properly track about the states in one place. This allows to reuse it_signal_seq to track reprogramming, disarm and delete operations in order to drop signals which are related to the state previous of those operations. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.670337048@linutronix.de
2024-10-29posix-timers: Rename k_itimer:: It_requeue_pendingThomas Gleixner
Prepare for using this struct member to do a proper reprogramming and deletion accounting so that stale signals can be dropped. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001083835.611997737@linutronix.de
2024-07-29posix-timers: Consolidate signal queueingThomas Gleixner
Rename posix_timer_event() to posix_timer_queue_signal() as this is what the function is about. Consolidate the requeue pending and deactivation updates into that function as there is no point in doing this in all incarnations of posix timers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Make k_itimer::it_active consistentThomas Gleixner
Posix CPU timers are not updating k_itimer::it_active which makes it impossible to base decisions in the common posix timer code on it. Update it when queueing or dequeueing posix CPU timers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-timers: Consolidate timer setupThomas Gleixner
hrtimer based and CPU timers have their own way to install the new interval and to reset overrun and signal handling related data. Create a helper function and do the same operation for all variants. This also makes the handling of the interval consistent. It's only stored when the timer is actually armed, i.e. timer->it_value != 0. Before that it was stored unconditionally for posix CPU timers and conditionally for the other posix timers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-timers: Retrieve interval in common timer_settime() codeThomas Gleixner
No point in doing this all over the place. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Simplify posix_cpu_timer_set()Thomas Gleixner
Avoid the late sighand lock/unlock dance when a timer is not armed to enforce reevaluation of the timer base so that the process wide CPU timer sampling can be disabled. Do it right at the point where the arming decision is made which already has sighand locked. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Remove incorrect comment in posix_cpu_timer_set()Thomas Gleixner
A leftover from historical code which describes fiction. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Use @now instead of @val for clarityThomas Gleixner
posix_cpu_timer_set() uses @val as variable for the current time. That's confusing at best. Use @now as anywhere else and rewrite the confusing comment about clock sampling. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Do not arm SIGEV_NONE timersThomas Gleixner
There is no point in arming SIGEV_NONE timers as they never deliver a signal. timer_gettime() is handling the expiry time correctly and that's all SIGEV_NONE timers care about. Prevent arming them and remove the expiry handler code which just disarms them. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Replace old expiry retrieval in posix_cpu_timer_set()Thomas Gleixner
Reuse the split out __posix_cpu_timer_get() function which does already the right thing. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Handle SIGEV_NONE timers correctly in timer_set()Thomas Gleixner
Expired SIGEV_NONE oneshot timers must return 0 nsec for the expiry time in timer_get(), but the posix CPU timer implementation returns 1 nsec. Add the missing conditional. This will be cleaned up in a follow up patch. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Handle SIGEV_NONE timers correctly in timer_get()Thomas Gleixner
Expired SIGEV_NONE oneshot timers must return 0 nsec for the expiry time in timer_get(), but the posix CPU timer implementation returns 1 nsec. Add the missing conditional. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Handle interval timers correctly in timer_get()Thomas Gleixner
timer_gettime() must return the remaining time to the next expiry of a timer or 0 if the timer is not armed and no signal pending, but posix CPU timers fail to forward a timer which is already expired. Add the required logic to address that. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Save interval only for armed timersThomas Gleixner
There is no point to return the interval for timers which have been disarmed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29posix-cpu-timers: Split up posix_cpu_timer_get()Thomas Gleixner
In preparation for addressing issues in the timer_get() and timer_set() functions of posix CPU timers. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2023-04-21posix-cpu-timers: Implement the missing timer_wait_running callbackThomas Gleixner
For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years. Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running() triggers with a posix CPU timer test case. Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK: 1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound. Implement an empty stub function for that case. 2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than suboptimal. The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock. This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock can be used too in a slightly different way: - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt. - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union members already - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and block on the expiry mutex This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and works nicely for RT too. Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT") Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx
2023-02-06posix-timers: Use atomic64_try_cmpxchg() in __update_gt_cputime()Uros Bizjak
Use atomic64_try_cmpxchg() instead of atomic64_cmpxchg() in __update_gt_cputime(). The x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag, so this change saves a compare after cmpxchg() (and related move instruction in front of cmpxchg()). Also, atomic64_try_cmpxchg() implicitly assigns old *ptr value to "old" when cmpxchg() fails. There is no need to re-read the value in the loop. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116165337.5810-1-ubizjak@gmail.com
2022-05-11signal: Replace __group_send_sig_info with send_signal_lockedEric W. Biederman
The function __group_send_sig_info is just a light wrapper around send_signal_locked with one parameter fixed to a constant value. As the wrapper adds no real value update the code to directly call the wrapped function. Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220505182645.497868-2-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2022-03-28Merge tag 'ptrace-cleanups-for-v5.18' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace Pull ptrace cleanups from Eric Biederman: "This set of changes removes tracehook.h, moves modification of all of the ptrace fields inside of siglock to remove races, adds a missing permission check to ptrace.c The removal of tracehook.h is quite significant as it has been a major source of confusion in recent years. Much of that confusion was around task_work and TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL (which I have now decoupled making the semantics clearer). For people who don't know tracehook.h is a vestiage of an attempt to implement uprobes like functionality that was never fully merged, and was later superseeded by uprobes when uprobes was merged. For many years now we have been removing what tracehook functionaly a little bit at a time. To the point where anything left in tracehook.h was some weird strange thing that was difficult to understand" * tag 'ptrace-cleanups-for-v5.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace: ptrace: Remove duplicated include in ptrace.c ptrace: Check PTRACE_O_SUSPEND_SECCOMP permission on PTRACE_SEIZE ptrace: Return the signal to continue with from ptrace_stop ptrace: Move setting/clearing ptrace_message into ptrace_stop tracehook: Remove tracehook.h resume_user_mode: Move to resume_user_mode.h resume_user_mode: Remove #ifdef TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME in set_notify_resume signal: Move set_notify_signal and clear_notify_signal into sched/signal.h task_work: Decouple TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL and task_work task_work: Call tracehook_notify_signal from get_signal on all architectures task_work: Introduce task_work_pending task_work: Remove unnecessary include from posix_timers.h ptrace: Remove tracehook_signal_handler ptrace: Remove arch_syscall_{enter,exit}_tracehook ptrace: Create ptrace_report_syscall_{entry,exit} in ptrace.h ptrace/arm: Rename tracehook_report_syscall report_syscall ptrace: Move ptrace_report_syscall into ptrace.h
2022-03-10task_work: Remove unnecessary include from posix_timers.hEric W. Biederman
Break a header file circular dependency by removing the unnecessary include of task_work.h from posix_timers.h. sched.h -> posix-timers.h posix-timers.h -> task_work.h task_work.h -> sched.h Add missing includes of task_work.h to: arch/x86/mm/tlb.c kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220309162454.123006-6-ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2022-03-08prlimit: do not grab the tasklist_lockBarret Rhoden
Unnecessarily grabbing the tasklist_lock can be a scalability bottleneck for workloads that also must grab the tasklist_lock for waiting, killing, and cloning. The tasklist_lock was grabbed to protect tsk->sighand from disappearing (becoming NULL). tsk->signal was already protected by holding a reference to tsk. update_rlimit_cpu() assumed tsk->sighand != NULL. With this commit, it attempts to lock_task_sighand(). However, this means that update_rlimit_cpu() can fail. This only happens when a task is exiting. Note that during exec, sighand may *change*, but it will not be NULL. Prior to this commit, the do_prlimit() ensured that update_rlimit_cpu() would not fail by read locking the tasklist_lock and checking tsk->sighand != NULL. If update_rlimit_cpu() fails, there may be other tasks that are not exiting that share tsk->signal. However, the group_leader is the last task to be released, so if we cannot update_rlimit_cpu(group_leader), then the entire process is exiting. The only other caller of update_rlimit_cpu() is selinux_bprm_committing_creds(). It has tsk == current, so update_rlimit_cpu() cannot fail (current->sighand cannot disappear until current exits). This change resulted in a 14% speedup on a microbenchmark where parents kill and wait on their children, and children getpriority, setpriority, and getrlimit. Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220106172041.522167-4-brho@google.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2021-11-02posix-cpu-timers: Clear task::posix_cputimers_work in copy_process()Michael Pratt
copy_process currently copies task_struct.posix_cputimers_work as-is. If a timer interrupt arrives while handling clone and before dup_task_struct completes then the child task will have: 1. posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true 2. posix_cputimers_work.work queued. copy_process clears task_struct.task_works, so (2) will have no effect and posix_cpu_timers_work will never run (not to mention it doesn't make sense for two tasks to share a common linked list). Since posix_cpu_timers_work never runs, posix_cputimers_work.scheduled is never cleared. Since scheduled is set, future timer interrupts will skip scheduling work, with the ultimate result that the task will never receive timer expirations. Together, the complete flow is: 1. Task 1 calls clone(), enters kernel. 2. Timer interrupt fires, schedules task work on Task 1. 2a. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true 2b. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.work added to task_struct.task_works. 3. dup_task_struct() copies Task 1 to Task 2. 4. copy_process() clears task_struct.task_works for Task 2. 5. Future timer interrupts on Task 2 see task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true and skip scheduling work. Fix this by explicitly clearing contents of task_struct.posix_cputimers_work in copy_process(). This was never meant to be shared or inherited across tasks in the first place. Fixes: 1fb497dd0030 ("posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work") Reported-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv> Signed-off-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211101210615.716522-1-mpratt@google.com
2021-09-23posix-cpu-timers: Prevent spuriously armed 0-value itimerFrederic Weisbecker
Resetting/stopping an itimer eventually leads to it being reprogrammed with an actual "0" value. As a result the itimer expires on the next tick, triggering an unexpected signal. To fix this, make sure that struct signal_struct::it[CPUCLOCK_PROF/VIRT]::expires is set to 0 when setitimer() passes a 0 it_value, indicating that the timer must stop. Fixes: 406dd42bd1ba ("posix-cpu-timers: Force next expiration recalc after itimer reset") Reported-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@redhat.com> Reported-by: Chris Hixon <linux-kernel-bugs@hixontech.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913145332.232023-1-frederic@kernel.org
2021-08-10posix-cpu-timers: Recalc next expiration when timer_settime() ends up not ↵Frederic Weisbecker
queueing There are several scenarios that can result in posix_cpu_timer_set() not queueing the timer but still leaving the threadgroup cputime counter running or keeping the tick dependency around for a random amount of time. 1) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is already disabled, the process wide cputime counter will be started and won't ever get a chance to be stopped by stop_process_timer() since no timer is actually armed to be processed. The following snippet is enough to trigger the issue. void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); timer_delete(id); } 2) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is already armed, the timer is dequeued but not really disarmed. So the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency may still remain a while around. The following code snippet keeps this overhead around for one week after the timer deletion: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; val.it_value.tv_sec = 604800; timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL); timer_delete(id); } 3) If the timer was initially deactivated, this call to timer_settime() with an early expiration may have started the process wide cputime counter even though the timer hasn't been queued and armed because it has fired early and inline within posix_cpu_timer_set() itself. As a result the process wide cputime counter may never stop until a new timer is ever armed in the future. The following code snippet can reproduce this: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); } 4) If the timer was initially armed with a former expiration value before this call to timer_settime() and the current call sets an early deadline that has already expired, the timer fires inline within posix_cpu_timer_set(). In this case it must have been dequeued before firing inline with its new expiration value, yet it hasn't been disarmed in this case. So the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency may still be around for a while even after the timer fired. The following code snippet can reproduce this: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); val.it_value.tv_sec = 100; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); val.it_value.tv_sec = 0; val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); } Fix all these issues with triggering the related base next expiration recalculation on the next tick. This also implies to re-evaluate the need to keep around the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency, in a similar fashion to disarm_timer(). Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-7-frederic@kernel.org
2021-08-10posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer base accessorFrederic Weisbecker
Remove the ad-hoc timer base accessors and provide a consolidated one. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-6-frederic@kernel.org
2021-08-10posix-cpu-timers: Remove confusing return value overrideFrederic Weisbecker
The end of the function cannot be reached with an error in variable ret. Unconfuse reviewers about that. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-5-frederic@kernel.org
2021-08-10posix-cpu-timers: Force next expiration recalc after itimer resetFrederic Weisbecker
When an itimer deactivates a previously armed expiration, it simply doesn't do anything. As a result the process wide cputime counter keeps running and the tick dependency stays set until it reaches the old ghost expiration value. This can be reproduced with the following snippet: void trigger_process_counter(void) { struct itimerval n = {}; n.it_value.tv_sec = 100; setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &n, NULL); n.it_value.tv_sec = 0; setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &n, NULL); } Fix this with resetting the relevant base expiration. This is similar to disarming a timer. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-4-frederic@kernel.org
2021-08-10posix-cpu-timers: Force next_expiration recalc after timer deletionFrederic Weisbecker
A timer deletion only dequeues the timer but it doesn't shutdown the related costly process wide cputimer counter and the tick dependency. The following code snippet keeps this overhead around for one week after the timer deletion: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; val.it_value.tv_sec = 604800; timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL); timer_delete(id); } Make sure the next target's tick recalculates the nearest expiration and clears the process wide counter and tick dependency if necessary. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-3-frederic@kernel.org
2021-08-10posix-cpu-timers: Assert task sighand is locked while starting cputime counterFrederic Weisbecker
Starting the process wide cputime counter needs to be done in the same sighand locking sequence than actually arming the related timer otherwise this races against concurrent timers setting/expiring in the same threadgroup. Detecting that the cputime counter is started without holding the sighand lock is a first step toward debugging such situations. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-2-frederic@kernel.org
2021-07-15posix-cpu-timers: Fix rearm racing against process tickFrederic Weisbecker
Since the process wide cputime counter is started locklessly from posix_cpu_timer_rearm(), it can be concurrently stopped by operations on other timers from the same thread group, such as in the following unlucky scenario: CPU 0 CPU 1 ----- ----- timer_settime(TIMER B) posix_cpu_timer_rearm(TIMER A) cpu_clock_sample_group() (pct->timers_active already true) handle_posix_cpu_timers() check_process_timers() stop_process_timers() pct->timers_active = false arm_timer(TIMER A) tick -> run_posix_cpu_timers() // sees !pct->timers_active, ignore // our TIMER A Fix this with simply locking process wide cputime counting start and timer arm in the same block. Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Fixes: 60f2ceaa8111 ("posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2021-05-13tick/nohz: Change signal tick dependency to wake up CPUs of member tasksMarcelo Tosatti
Rather than waking up all nohz_full CPUs on the system, only wake up the target CPUs of member threads of the signal. Reduces interruptions to nohz_full CPUs. Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210512232924.150322-8-frederic@kernel.org
2021-04-26Merge tag 'timers-core-2021-04-26' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull timer updates from Thomas Gleixner: "The time and timers updates contain: Core changes: - Allow runtime power management when the clocksource is changed. - A correctness fix for clock_adjtime32() so that the return value on success is not overwritten by the result of the copy to user. - Allow late installment of broadcast clockevent devices which was broken because nothing switched them over to oneshot mode. This went unnoticed so far because clockevent devices used to be built in, but now people started to make them modular. - Debugfs related simplifications - Small cleanups and improvements here and there Driver changes: - The usual set of device tree binding updates for a wide range of drivers/devices. - The usual updates and improvements for drivers all over the place but nothing outstanding. - No new clocksource/event drivers. They'll come back next time" * tag 'timers-core-2021-04-26' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (24 commits) posix-timers: Preserve return value in clock_adjtime32() tick/broadcast: Allow late registered device to enter oneshot mode tick: Use tick_check_replacement() instead of open coding it time/timecounter: Mark 1st argument of timecounter_cyc2time() as const dt-bindings: timer: nuvoton,npcm7xx: Add wpcm450-timer clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Add __ro_after_init and __init clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Handle dra7 timer wrap errata i940 clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Prepare to handle dra7 timer wrap issue clocksource/drivers/dw_apb_timer_of: Add handling for potential memory leak clocksource/drivers/npcm: Add support for WPCM450 clocksource/drivers/sh_cmt: Don't use CMTOUT_IE with R-Car Gen2/3 clocksource/drivers/pistachio: Fix trivial typo clocksource/drivers/ingenic_ost: Fix return value check in ingenic_ost_probe() clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add missing set_state_oneshot_stopped clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Fix posted mode status check order dt-bindings: timer: renesas,cmt: Document R8A77961 dt-bindings: timer: renesas,cmt: Add r8a779a0 CMT support clocksource/drivers/ingenic-ost: Add support for the JZ4760B clocksource/drivers/ingenic: Add support for the JZ4760 dt-bindings: timer: ingenic: Add compatible strings for JZ4760(B) ...
2021-03-22timekeeping, clocksource: Fix various typos in commentsIngo Molnar
Fix ~56 single-word typos in timekeeping & clocksource code comments. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
2021-03-16kernel, fs: Introduce and use set_restart_fn() and arch_set_restart_data()Oleg Nesterov
Preparation for fixing get_nr_restart_syscall() on X86 for COMPAT. Add a new helper which sets restart_block->fn and calls a dummy arch_set_restart_data() helper. Fixes: 609c19a385c8 ("x86/ptrace: Stop setting TS_COMPAT in ptrace code") Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210201174641.GA17871@redhat.com
2020-08-06posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_workThomas Gleixner
Running posix CPU timers in hard interrupt context has a few downsides: - For PREEMPT_RT it cannot work as the expiry code needs to take sighand lock, which is a 'sleeping spinlock' in RT. The original RT approach of offloading the posix CPU timer handling into a high priority thread was clumsy and provided no real benefit in general. - For fine grained accounting it's just wrong to run this in context of the timer interrupt because that way a process specific CPU time is accounted to the timer interrupt. - Long running timer interrupts caused by a large amount of expiring timers which can be created and armed by unpriviledged user space. There is no hard requirement to expire them in interrupt context. If the signal is targeted at the task itself then it won't be delivered before the task returns to user space anyway. If the signal is targeted at a supervisor process then it might be slightly delayed, but posix CPU timers are inaccurate anyway due to the fact that they are tied to the tick. Provide infrastructure to schedule task work which allows splitting the posix CPU timer code into a quick check in interrupt context and a thread context expiry and signal delivery function. This has to be enabled by architectures as it requires that the architecture specific KVM implementation handles pending task work before exiting to guest mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.783470146@linutronix.de
2020-08-06posix-cpu-timers: Split run_posix_cpu_timers()Thomas Gleixner
Split it up as a preparatory step to move the heavy lifting out of interrupt context. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.677439437@linutronix.de
2020-04-29posix-cpu-timers: Replace __get_task_for_clock with pid_for_clockEric W. Biederman
Now that the codes store references to pids instead of referendes to tasks. Looking up a task for a clock instead of looking up a struct pid makes the code more difficult to verify it is correct than necessary. In posix_cpu_timers_create get_task_pid can race with release_task for threads and return a NULL pid. As put_pid and cpu_timer_task_rcu handle NULL pids just fine the code works without problems but it is an extra case to consider and keep in mind while verifying and modifying the code. There are races with de_thread to consider that only don't apply because thread clocks are only allowed for threads in the same thread_group. So instead of leaving a burden for people making modification to the code in the future return a rcu protected struct pid for the clock instead. The logic for __get_task_for_pid and lookup_task has been folded into the new function pid_for_clock with the only change being the logic has been modified from working on a task to working on a pid that will be returned. In posix_cpu_clock_get instead of calling pid_for_clock checking the result and then calling pid_task to get the task. The result of pid_for_clock is fed directly into pid_task. This is safe because pid_task handles NULL pids. As such an extra error check was unnecessary. Instead of hiding the flag that enables the special clock_gettime handling, I have made the 3 callers just pass the flag in themselves. That is less code and seems just as simple to work with as the wrapper functions. Historically the clock_gettime special case of allowing a process clock to be found by the thread id did not even exist [33ab0fec3352] but Thomas Gleixner reports that he has found code that uses that functionality [55e8c8eb2c7b]. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87zhaxqkwa.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/ Ref: 33ab0fec3352 ("posix-timers: Consolidate posix_cpu_clock_get()") Ref: 55e8c8eb2c7b ("posix-cpu-timers: Store a reference to a pid not a task") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-04-29posix-cpu-timers: Replace cpu_timer_pid_type with clock_pid_typeEric W. Biederman
Taking a clock and returning a pid_type is a more general and a superset of taking a timer and returning a pid_type. Perform this generalization so that future changes may use this code on clocks as well as timers. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-04-29posix-cpu-timers: Extend rcu_read_lock removing task_struct referencesEric W. Biederman
Now that the code stores of pid references it is no longer necessary or desirable to take a reference on task_struct in __get_task_for_clock. Instead extend the scope of rcu_read_lock and remove the reference counting on struct task_struct entirely. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-04-28posix-cpu-timer: Unify the now redundant code in lookup_taskEric W. Biederman
Now that both !thread paths through lookup_task call thread_group_leader, unify them into the single test at the end of lookup_task. This unification just makes it clear what is happening in the gettime special case of lookup_task. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-04-28posix-cpu-timer: Tidy up group_leader logic in lookup_taskEric W. Biederman
Replace has_group_leader_pid with thread_group_leader. Years ago Oleg suggested changing thread_group_leader to has_group_leader_pid to handle races. Looking at the code then and now I don't see how it ever helped. Especially as then the code really did need to be the thread_group_leader. Today it doesn't make a difference if thread_group_leader races with de_thread as the task returned from lookup_task in the non-thread case is just used to find values in task->signal. Since the races with de_thread have never been handled revert has_group_header_pid to thread_group_leader for clarity. Update the comment in lookup_task to remove implementation details that are no longer true and to mention task->signal instead of task->sighand, as the relevant cpu timer details are all in task->signal. Ref: 55e8c8eb2c7b ("posix-cpu-timers: Store a reference to a pid not a task") Ref: c0deae8c9587 ("posix-cpu-timers: Rcu_read_lock/unlock protect find_task_by_vpid call") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2020-03-30Merge tag 'timers-core-2020-03-30' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull timekeeping and timer updates from Thomas Gleixner: "Core: - Consolidation of the vDSO build infrastructure to address the difficulties of cross-builds for ARM64 compat vDSO libraries by restricting the exposure of header content to the vDSO build. This is achieved by splitting out header content into separate headers. which contain only the minimaly required information which is necessary to build the vDSO. These new headers are included from the kernel headers and the vDSO specific files. - Enhancements to the generic vDSO library allowing more fine grained control over the compiled in code, further reducing architecture specific storage and preparing for adopting the generic library by PPC. - Cleanup and consolidation of the exit related code in posix CPU timers. - Small cleanups and enhancements here and there Drivers: - The obligatory new drivers: Ingenic JZ47xx and X1000 TCU support - Correct the clock rate of PIT64b global clock - setup_irq() cleanup - Preparation for PWM and suspend support for the TI DM timer - Expand the fttmr010 driver to support ast2600 systems - The usual small fixes, enhancements and cleanups all over the place" * tag 'timers-core-2020-03-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (80 commits) Revert "clocksource/drivers/timer-probe: Avoid creating dead devices" vdso: Fix clocksource.h macro detection um: Fix header inclusion arm64: vdso32: Enable Clang Compilation lib/vdso: Enable common headers arm: vdso: Enable arm to use common headers x86/vdso: Enable x86 to use common headers mips: vdso: Enable mips to use common headers arm64: vdso32: Include common headers in the vdso library arm64: vdso: Include common headers in the vdso library arm64: Introduce asm/vdso/processor.h arm64: vdso32: Code clean up linux/elfnote.h: Replace elf.h with UAPI equivalent scripts: Fix the inclusion order in modpost common: Introduce processor.h linux/ktime.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/jiffies.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/time64.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/time32.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/time.h: Extract common header for vDSO ...
2020-03-21lockdep: Add posixtimer context tracing bitsSebastian Andrzej Siewior
Splitting run_posix_cpu_timers() into two parts is work in progress which is stuck on other entry code related problems. The heavy lifting which involves locking of sighand lock will be moved into task context so the necessary execution time is burdened on the task and not on interrupt context. Until this work completes lockdep with the spinlock nesting rules enabled would emit warnings for this known context. Prevent it by setting "->irq_config = 1" for the invocation of run_posix_cpu_timers() so lockdep does not complain when sighand lock is acquried. This will be removed once the split is completed. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.751182723@linutronix.de
2020-03-04posix-cpu-timers: Store a reference to a pid not a taskEric W. Biederman
posix cpu timers do not handle the death of a process well. This is most clearly seen when a multi-threaded process calls exec from a thread that is not the leader of the thread group. The posix cpu timer code continues to pin the old thread group leader and is unable to find the siglock from there. This results in posix_cpu_timer_del being unable to delete a timer, posix_cpu_timer_set being unable to set a timer. Further to compensate for the problems in posix_cpu_timer_del on a multi-threaded exec all timers that point at the multi-threaded task are stopped. The code for the timers fundamentally needs to check if the target process/thread is alive. This needs an extra level of indirection. This level of indirection is already available in struct pid. So replace cpu.task with cpu.pid to get the needed extra layer of indirection. In addition to handling things more cleanly this reduces the amount of memory a timer can pin when a process exits and then is reaped from a task_struct to the vastly smaller struct pid. Fixes: e0a70217107e ("posix-cpu-timers: workaround to suppress the problems with mt exec") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87wo86tz6d.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org