| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
swiotlb passes virtual addresses to set_memory_encrypted() and
set_memory_decrypted(), but uv_remove_shared() and uv_set_shared()
expect physical addresses. This currently works, because virtual
and physical addresses are the same.
Add virt_to_phys() to resolve the virtual-physical confusion.
Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221107121221.156274-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Message-Id: <20221107121221.156274-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
|
|
Replace uses of mem_encrypt_active() with calls to cc_platform_has() with
the CC_ATTR_MEM_ENCRYPT attribute.
Remove the implementation of mem_encrypt_active() across all arches.
For s390, since the default implementation of the cc_platform_has()
matches the s390 implementation of mem_encrypt_active(), cc_platform_has()
does not need to be implemented in s390 (the config option
ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM is not set).
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928191009.32551-9-bp@alien8.de
|
|
All references to sev_active() were moved to arch/x86 so we don't need to
define it for s390 anymore.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com
|
|
Now that generic code doesn't reference them, move sme_active() and
sme_me_mask to x86's <asm/mem_encrypt.h>.
Also remove the export for sme_active() since it's only used in files that
won't be built as modules. sme_me_mask on the other hand is used in
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c (via __sme_set() and __psp_pa()) which can be built as a
module so its export needs to stay.
Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806044919.10622-5-bauerman@linux.ibm.com
|
|
On s390, protected virtualization guests have to use bounced I/O
buffers. That requires some plumbing.
Let us make sure, any device that uses DMA API with direct ops correctly
is spared from the problems, that a hypervisor attempting I/O to a
non-shared page would bring.
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
|
