diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/slab.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index f2e92dc1c9ce..6ad6bd5a0b3e 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -1648,6 +1648,14 @@ static inline size_t calculate_slab_order(struct kmem_cache *cachep, left_over = remainder; /* + * A VFS-reclaimable slab tends to have most allocations + * as GFP_NOFS and we really don't want to have to be allocating + * higher-order pages when we are unable to shrink dcache. + */ + if (flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) + break; + + /* * Large number of objects is good, but very large slabs are * currently bad for the gfp()s. */ @@ -1869,17 +1877,7 @@ kmem_cache_create (const char *name, size_t size, size_t align, size = ALIGN(size, align); - if ((flags & SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT) && size <= PAGE_SIZE) { - /* - * A VFS-reclaimable slab tends to have most allocations - * as GFP_NOFS and we really don't want to have to be allocating - * higher-order pages when we are unable to shrink dcache. - */ - cachep->gfporder = 0; - cache_estimate(cachep->gfporder, size, align, flags, - &left_over, &cachep->num); - } else - left_over = calculate_slab_order(cachep, size, align, flags); + left_over = calculate_slab_order(cachep, size, align, flags); if (!cachep->num) { printk("kmem_cache_create: couldn't create cache %s.\n", name); |