diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/filter.h | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 96 |
4 files changed, 99 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index 3a74033d49c4..d62bb2ca1828 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -633,6 +633,12 @@ struct bpf_subprog_arg_info { }; }; +enum priv_stack_mode { + PRIV_STACK_UNKNOWN, + NO_PRIV_STACK, + PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE, +}; + struct bpf_subprog_info { /* 'start' has to be the first field otherwise find_subprog() won't work */ u32 start; /* insn idx of function entry point */ @@ -653,6 +659,7 @@ struct bpf_subprog_info { /* true if bpf_fastcall stack region is used by functions that can't be inlined */ bool keep_fastcall_stack: 1; + enum priv_stack_mode priv_stack_mode; u8 arg_cnt; struct bpf_subprog_arg_info args[MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS]; }; diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 7d7578a8eac1..3a21947f2fd4 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -1119,6 +1119,7 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_exceptions(void); bool bpf_jit_supports_ptr_xchg(void); bool bpf_jit_supports_arena(void); bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena); +bool bpf_jit_supports_private_stack(void); u64 bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void); void arch_bpf_stack_walk(bool (*consume_fn)(void *cookie, u64 ip, u64 sp, u64 bp), void *cookie); bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(void *func); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 233ea78f8f1b..14d9288441f2 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -3045,6 +3045,11 @@ bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_exceptions(void) return false; } +bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_private_stack(void) +{ + return false; +} + void __weak arch_bpf_stack_walk(bool (*consume_fn)(void *cookie, u64 ip, u64 sp, u64 bp), void *cookie) { } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 9f5de8d4fbd0..fb23793ac53d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem { #define BPF_GLOBAL_PERCPU_MA_MAX_SIZE 512 +#define BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE 64 + static int acquire_reference_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx); static int release_reference(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int ref_obj_id); static void invalidate_non_owning_refs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env); @@ -6090,6 +6092,34 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, strict); } +static enum priv_stack_mode bpf_enable_priv_stack(struct bpf_prog *prog) +{ + if (!bpf_jit_supports_private_stack()) + return NO_PRIV_STACK; + + /* bpf_prog_check_recur() checks all prog types that use bpf trampoline + * while kprobe/tp/perf_event/raw_tp don't use trampoline hence checked + * explicitly. + */ + switch (prog->type) { + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT: + return PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE; + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM: + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS: + if (bpf_prog_check_recur(prog)) + return PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE; + fallthrough; + default: + break; + } + + return NO_PRIV_STACK; +} + static int round_up_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int stack_depth) { if (env->prog->jit_requested) @@ -6107,17 +6137,20 @@ static int round_up_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int stack_depth) * Since recursion is prevented by check_cfg() this algorithm * only needs a local stack of MAX_CALL_FRAMES to remember callsites */ -static int check_max_stack_depth_subprog(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx) +static int check_max_stack_depth_subprog(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int idx, + bool priv_stack_supported) { struct bpf_subprog_info *subprog = env->subprog_info; struct bpf_insn *insn = env->prog->insnsi; - int depth = 0, frame = 0, i, subprog_end; + int depth = 0, frame = 0, i, subprog_end, subprog_depth; bool tail_call_reachable = false; int ret_insn[MAX_CALL_FRAMES]; int ret_prog[MAX_CALL_FRAMES]; int j; i = subprog[idx].start; + if (!priv_stack_supported) + subprog[idx].priv_stack_mode = NO_PRIV_STACK; process_func: /* protect against potential stack overflow that might happen when * bpf2bpf calls get combined with tailcalls. Limit the caller's stack @@ -6144,11 +6177,31 @@ process_func: depth); return -EACCES; } - depth += round_up_stack_depth(env, subprog[idx].stack_depth); - if (depth > MAX_BPF_STACK) { - verbose(env, "combined stack size of %d calls is %d. Too large\n", - frame + 1, depth); - return -EACCES; + + subprog_depth = round_up_stack_depth(env, subprog[idx].stack_depth); + if (priv_stack_supported) { + /* Request private stack support only if the subprog stack + * depth is no less than BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE. This is to + * avoid jit penalty if the stack usage is small. + */ + if (subprog[idx].priv_stack_mode == PRIV_STACK_UNKNOWN && + subprog_depth >= BPF_PRIV_STACK_MIN_SIZE) + subprog[idx].priv_stack_mode = PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE; + } + + if (subprog[idx].priv_stack_mode == PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE) { + if (subprog_depth > MAX_BPF_STACK) { + verbose(env, "stack size of subprog %d is %d. Too large\n", + idx, subprog_depth); + return -EACCES; + } + } else { + depth += subprog_depth; + if (depth > MAX_BPF_STACK) { + verbose(env, "combined stack size of %d calls is %d. Too large\n", + frame + 1, depth); + return -EACCES; + } } continue_func: subprog_end = subprog[idx + 1].start; @@ -6205,6 +6258,8 @@ continue_func: } i = next_insn; idx = sidx; + if (!priv_stack_supported) + subprog[idx].priv_stack_mode = NO_PRIV_STACK; if (subprog[idx].has_tail_call) tail_call_reachable = true; @@ -6238,7 +6293,8 @@ continue_func: */ if (frame == 0) return 0; - depth -= round_up_stack_depth(env, subprog[idx].stack_depth); + if (subprog[idx].priv_stack_mode != PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE) + depth -= round_up_stack_depth(env, subprog[idx].stack_depth); frame--; i = ret_insn[frame]; idx = ret_prog[frame]; @@ -6247,16 +6303,36 @@ continue_func: static int check_max_stack_depth(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { + enum priv_stack_mode priv_stack_mode = PRIV_STACK_UNKNOWN; struct bpf_subprog_info *si = env->subprog_info; + bool priv_stack_supported; int ret; for (int i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) { + if (si[i].has_tail_call) { + priv_stack_mode = NO_PRIV_STACK; + break; + } + } + + if (priv_stack_mode == PRIV_STACK_UNKNOWN) + priv_stack_mode = bpf_enable_priv_stack(env->prog); + + /* All async_cb subprogs use normal kernel stack. If a particular + * subprog appears in both main prog and async_cb subtree, that + * subprog will use normal kernel stack to avoid potential nesting. + * The reverse subprog traversal ensures when main prog subtree is + * checked, the subprogs appearing in async_cb subtrees are already + * marked as using normal kernel stack, so stack size checking can + * be done properly. + */ + for (int i = env->subprog_cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) { if (!i || si[i].is_async_cb) { - ret = check_max_stack_depth_subprog(env, i); + priv_stack_supported = !i && priv_stack_mode == PRIV_STACK_ADAPTIVE; + ret = check_max_stack_depth_subprog(env, i, priv_stack_supported); if (ret < 0) return ret; } - continue; } return 0; } |