summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWilly Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>2023-01-09 08:54:41 +0100
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>2023-01-09 09:36:05 -0800
commit1bfbe1f3e96720daf185f03d101f072d69753f88 (patch)
treedb3ab114fa9e2671aa31226a16a76920caf69ffc /tools
parent55abdd1f5e1e07418bf4a46c233a92f83cb5ae97 (diff)
downloadlwn-1bfbe1f3e96720daf185f03d101f072d69753f88.tar.gz
lwn-1bfbe1f3e96720daf185f03d101f072d69753f88.zip
tools/nolibc: prevent gcc from making memset() loop over itself
When building on ARM in thumb mode with gcc-11.3 at -O2 or -O3, nolibc-test segfaults during the select() tests. It turns out that at this level, gcc recognizes an opportunity for using memset() to zero the fd_set, but it miscompiles it because it also recognizes a memset pattern as well, and decides to call memset() from the memset() code: 000122bc <memset>: 122bc: b510 push {r4, lr} 122be: 0004 movs r4, r0 122c0: 2a00 cmp r2, #0 122c2: d003 beq.n 122cc <memset+0x10> 122c4: 23ff movs r3, #255 ; 0xff 122c6: 4019 ands r1, r3 122c8: f7ff fff8 bl 122bc <memset> 122cc: 0020 movs r0, r4 122ce: bd10 pop {r4, pc} Simply placing an empty asm() statement inside the loop suffices to avoid this. Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r--tools/include/nolibc/string.h5
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/string.h b/tools/include/nolibc/string.h
index 0932db3817d2..fffdaf6ff467 100644
--- a/tools/include/nolibc/string.h
+++ b/tools/include/nolibc/string.h
@@ -88,8 +88,11 @@ void *memset(void *dst, int b, size_t len)
{
char *p = dst;
- while (len--)
+ while (len--) {
+ /* prevent gcc from recognizing memset() here */
+ asm volatile("");
*(p++) = b;
+ }
return dst;
}