nexthop: Add netlink defines and enumerators for resilient NH groups

- RTM_NEWNEXTHOP et.al. that handle resilient groups will have a new nested
  attribute, NHA_RES_GROUP, whose elements are attributes NHA_RES_GROUP_*.

- RTM_NEWNEXTHOPBUCKET et.al. is a suite of new messages that will
  currently serve only for dumping of individual buckets of resilient next
  hop groups. For nexthop group buckets, these messages will carry a nested
  attribute NHA_RES_BUCKET, whose elements are attributes NHA_RES_BUCKET_*.

  There are several reasons why a new suite of messages is created for
  nexthop buckets instead of overloading the information on the existing
  RTM_{NEW,DEL,GET}NEXTHOP messages.

  First, a nexthop group can contain a large number of nexthop buckets (4k
  is not unheard of). This imposes limits on the amount of information that
  can be encoded for each nexthop bucket given a netlink message is limited
  to 64k bytes.

  Second, while RTM_NEWNEXTHOPBUCKET is only used for notifications at
  this point, in the future it can be extended to provide user space with
  control over nexthop buckets configuration.

- The new group type is NEXTHOP_GRP_TYPE_RES. Note that nexthop code is
  adjusted to bounce groups with that type for now.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c b/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c
index b69231918686..d59276f48d4f 100644
--- a/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c
+++ b/security/selinux/nlmsgtab.c
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ static const struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_route_perms[] =
 	{ RTM_NEWVLAN,		NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
 	{ RTM_DELVLAN,		NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
 	{ RTM_GETVLAN,		NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ  },
+	{ RTM_NEWNEXTHOPBUCKET,	NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
+	{ RTM_DELNEXTHOPBUCKET,	NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_WRITE },
+	{ RTM_GETNEXTHOPBUCKET,	NETLINK_ROUTE_SOCKET__NLMSG_READ  },
 };
 
 static const struct nlmsg_perm nlmsg_tcpdiag_perms[] =
@@ -171,7 +174,7 @@ int selinux_nlmsg_lookup(u16 sclass, u16 nlmsg_type, u32 *perm)
 		 * structures at the top of this file with the new mappings
 		 * before updating the BUILD_BUG_ON() macro!
 		 */
-		BUILD_BUG_ON(RTM_MAX != (RTM_NEWVLAN + 3));
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(RTM_MAX != (RTM_NEWNEXTHOPBUCKET + 3));
 		err = nlmsg_perm(nlmsg_type, perm, nlmsg_route_perms,
 				 sizeof(nlmsg_route_perms));
 		break;