summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/integrity
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>2020-08-11 14:26:21 -0500
committerMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>2020-08-31 17:45:14 -0400
commit48ce1ddce16b0d1e3ff948da40a0d5125a4ee1a0 (patch)
treeac61a13bfdde5936b29985c6a60ab75dc7ff3af7 /security/integrity
parent176377d97d6a3fae971ecb1f47d9b9cb7dab05ef (diff)
downloadlwn-48ce1ddce16b0d1e3ff948da40a0d5125a4ee1a0.tar.gz
lwn-48ce1ddce16b0d1e3ff948da40a0d5125a4ee1a0.zip
ima: Fail rule parsing when asymmetric key measurement isn't supportable
Measuring keys is currently only supported for asymmetric keys. In the future, this might change. For now, the "func=KEY_CHECK" and "keyrings=" options are only appropriate when CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS is enabled. Make this clear at policy load so that IMA policy authors don't assume that these policy language constructs are supported. Fixes: 2b60c0ecedf8 ("IMA: Read keyrings= option from the IMA policy") Fixes: 5808611cccb2 ("IMA: Add KEY_CHECK func to measure keys") Suggested-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/integrity')
-rw-r--r--security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index ea224f00b305..fe1df373c113 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -1233,7 +1233,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
entry->func = POLICY_CHECK;
else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "KEXEC_CMDLINE") == 0)
entry->func = KEXEC_CMDLINE;
- else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "KEY_CHECK") == 0)
+ else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS) &&
+ strcmp(args[0].from, "KEY_CHECK") == 0)
entry->func = KEY_CHECK;
else
result = -EINVAL;
@@ -1290,7 +1291,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
case Opt_keyrings:
ima_log_string(ab, "keyrings", args[0].from);
- if (entry->keyrings) {
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS) ||
+ entry->keyrings) {
result = -EINVAL;
break;
}