diff options
| author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> | 2021-04-22 15:00:32 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2021-06-23 10:57:17 +0200 |
| commit | e93bdd78406da9ed01554c51e38b2a02c8ef8025 (patch) | |
| tree | ac2c98cb0b11b66171f679d36dd35f4c921f0333 /net/wireless | |
| parent | 38f75922a6905b010f597fc70dbb5db28398728e (diff) | |
| download | lwn-e93bdd78406da9ed01554c51e38b2a02c8ef8025.tar.gz lwn-e93bdd78406da9ed01554c51e38b2a02c8ef8025.zip | |
wireless: wext-spy: Fix out-of-bounds warning
Fix the following out-of-bounds warning:
net/wireless/wext-spy.c:178:2: warning: 'memcpy' offset [25, 28] from the object at 'threshold' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'low' with type 'struct iw_quality' at offset 20 [-Warray-bounds]
The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a
couple of struct members adjacent to each other in a single call to
memcpy(). This causes a legitimate compiler warning because memcpy()
overruns the length of &threshold.low and &spydata->spy_thr_low. As
these are just a couple of struct members, fix this by using direct
assignments, instead of memcpy().
This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds
and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines
on memcpy().
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422200032.GA168995@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/wireless')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/wireless/wext-spy.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/net/wireless/wext-spy.c b/net/wireless/wext-spy.c index 33bef22e44e9..b379a0371653 100644 --- a/net/wireless/wext-spy.c +++ b/net/wireless/wext-spy.c @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ int iw_handler_set_thrspy(struct net_device * dev, return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* Just do it */ - memcpy(&(spydata->spy_thr_low), &(threshold->low), - 2 * sizeof(struct iw_quality)); + spydata->spy_thr_low = threshold->low; + spydata->spy_thr_high = threshold->high; /* Clear flag */ memset(spydata->spy_thr_under, '\0', sizeof(spydata->spy_thr_under)); @@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ int iw_handler_get_thrspy(struct net_device * dev, return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* Just do it */ - memcpy(&(threshold->low), &(spydata->spy_thr_low), - 2 * sizeof(struct iw_quality)); + threshold->low = spydata->spy_thr_low; + threshold->high = spydata->spy_thr_high; return 0; } @@ -173,10 +173,10 @@ static void iw_send_thrspy_event(struct net_device * dev, memcpy(threshold.addr.sa_data, address, ETH_ALEN); threshold.addr.sa_family = ARPHRD_ETHER; /* Copy stats */ - memcpy(&(threshold.qual), wstats, sizeof(struct iw_quality)); + threshold.qual = *wstats; /* Copy also thresholds */ - memcpy(&(threshold.low), &(spydata->spy_thr_low), - 2 * sizeof(struct iw_quality)); + threshold.low = spydata->spy_thr_low; + threshold.high = spydata->spy_thr_high; /* Send event to user space */ wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWTHRSPY, &wrqu, (char *) &threshold); |