summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIlya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>2023-01-28 01:06:33 +0100
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2023-01-28 12:30:09 -0800
commitbe6b5c10ecc4014446e5c807d6a69c5a7cc1c497 (patch)
treea7569719e03da3a9c27bbf7e1a686aea5e846a64 /net/bpf
parent80a611904eef65e8c60e0c8c8f50fa98a0bd0c69 (diff)
downloadlwn-be6b5c10ecc4014446e5c807d6a69c5a7cc1c497.tar.gz
lwn-be6b5c10ecc4014446e5c807d6a69c5a7cc1c497.zip
selftests/bpf: Add a sign-extension test for kfuncs
s390x ABI requires the caller to zero- or sign-extend the arguments. eBPF already deals with zero-extension (by definition of its ABI), but not with sign-extension. Add a test to cover that potentially problematic area. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230128000650.1516334-15-iii@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bpf')
-rw-r--r--net/bpf/test_run.c9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 8da0d73b368e..7dbefa4fd2eb 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -550,6 +550,14 @@ struct sock * noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test3(struct sock *sk)
return sk;
}
+long noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d)
+{
+ /* Provoke the compiler to assume that the caller has sign-extended a,
+ * b and c on platforms where this is required (e.g. s390x).
+ */
+ return (long)a + (long)b + (long)c + d;
+}
+
struct prog_test_member1 {
int a;
};
@@ -746,6 +754,7 @@ BTF_SET8_START(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test1)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test2)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test3)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test4)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_memb_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_release, KF_RELEASE)