summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>2024-04-23 18:28:20 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2024-04-25 12:42:43 -0700
commit980ca8ceeae69ddf362870ea9183f389ae26324a (patch)
treeb66c8c8eacef1fd3ce9d0dd4afa3f04643706a6b /net/bpf
parentf612210d456a0b969a0adca91e68dbea0e0ea301 (diff)
downloadlwn-980ca8ceeae69ddf362870ea9183f389ae26324a.tar.gz
lwn-980ca8ceeae69ddf362870ea9183f389ae26324a.zip
bpf: check bpf_dummy_struct_ops program params for test runs
When doing BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN for bpf_dummy_struct_ops programs, reject execution when NULL is passed for non-nullable params. For programs with non-nullable params verifier assumes that such params are never NULL and thus might optimize out NULL checks. Suggested-by: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240424012821.595216-5-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bpf')
-rw-r--r--net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c51
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
index 8f413cdfd91a..891cdf61c65a 100644
--- a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
+++ b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
@@ -79,6 +79,51 @@ static int dummy_ops_call_op(void *image, struct bpf_dummy_ops_test_args *args)
args->args[3], args->args[4]);
}
+static const struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *find_ctx_arg_info(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux, int offset)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < aux->ctx_arg_info_size; i++)
+ if (aux->ctx_arg_info[i].offset == offset)
+ return &aux->ctx_arg_info[i];
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* There is only one check at the moment:
+ * - zero should not be passed for pointer parameters not marked as nullable.
+ */
+static int check_test_run_args(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_dummy_ops_test_args *args)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *func_proto = prog->aux->attach_func_proto;
+
+ for (u32 arg_no = 0; arg_no < btf_type_vlen(func_proto) ; ++arg_no) {
+ const struct btf_param *param = &btf_params(func_proto)[arg_no];
+ const struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *info;
+ const struct btf_type *t;
+ int offset;
+
+ if (args->args[arg_no] != 0)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Program is validated already, so there is no need
+ * to check if t is NULL.
+ */
+ t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(bpf_dummy_ops_btf, param->type, NULL);
+ if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t))
+ continue;
+
+ offset = btf_ctx_arg_offset(bpf_dummy_ops_btf, func_proto, arg_no);
+ info = find_ctx_arg_info(prog->aux, offset);
+ if (info && (info->reg_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL))
+ continue;
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
extern const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_struct_ops_link_lops;
int bpf_struct_ops_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
@@ -87,7 +132,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops = &bpf_bpf_dummy_ops;
const struct btf_type *func_proto;
struct bpf_dummy_ops_test_args *args;
- struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks;
+ struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks = NULL;
struct bpf_tramp_link *link = NULL;
void *image = NULL;
unsigned int op_idx;
@@ -109,6 +154,10 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
if (IS_ERR(args))
return PTR_ERR(args);
+ err = check_test_run_args(prog, args);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
tlinks = kcalloc(BPF_TRAMP_MAX, sizeof(*tlinks), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tlinks) {
err = -ENOMEM;