diff options
author | Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> | 2014-08-06 16:05:06 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2015-01-29 17:40:52 -0800 |
commit | cbc42af9f6d80d270ce02c6f5daf21afed3fcb71 (patch) | |
tree | a03a21104dd8600d5b7469bdca1f5423119509ae /mm | |
parent | 63aefc47b630e845bd46e5303cb7a3a3f44c8e6f (diff) | |
download | lwn-cbc42af9f6d80d270ce02c6f5daf21afed3fcb71.tar.gz lwn-cbc42af9f6d80d270ce02c6f5daf21afed3fcb71.zip |
vmalloc: use rcu list iterator to reduce vmap_area_lock contention
commit 474750aba88817c53f39424e5567b8e4acc4b39b upstream.
Richard Yao reported a month ago that his system have a trouble with
vmap_area_lock contention during performance analysis by /proc/meminfo.
Andrew asked why his analysis checks /proc/meminfo stressfully, but he
didn't answer it.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/10/416
Although I'm not sure that this is right usage or not, there is a
solution reducing vmap_area_lock contention with no side-effect. That
is just to use rcu list iterator in get_vmalloc_info().
rcu can be used in this function because all RCU protocol is already
respected by writers, since Nick Piggin commit db64fe02258f1 ("mm:
rewrite vmap layer") back in linux-2.6.28
Specifically :
insertions use list_add_rcu(),
deletions use list_del_rcu() and kfree_rcu().
Note the rb tree is not used from rcu reader (it would not be safe),
only the vmap_area_list has full RCU protection.
Note that __purge_vmap_area_lazy() already uses this rcu protection.
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(va, &vmap_area_list, list) {
if (va->flags & VM_LAZY_FREE) {
if (va->va_start < *start)
*start = va->va_start;
if (va->va_end > *end)
*end = va->va_end;
nr += (va->va_end - va->va_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
list_add_tail(&va->purge_list, &valist);
va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREEING;
va->flags &= ~VM_LAZY_FREE;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
Peter:
: While rcu list traversal over the vmap_area_list is safe, this may
: arrive at different results than the spinlocked version. The rcu list
: traversal version will not be a 'snapshot' of a single, valid instant
: of the entire vmap_area_list, but rather a potential amalgam of
: different list states.
Joonsoo:
: Yes, you are right, but I don't think that we should be strict here.
: Meminfo is already not a 'snapshot' at specific time. While we try to get
: certain stats, the other stats can change. And, although we may arrive at
: different results than the spinlocked version, the difference would not be
: large and would not make serious side-effect.
[edumazet@google.com: add more commit description]
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Reported-by: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmalloc.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c index 0fdf96803c5b..aa3891e8e388 100644 --- a/mm/vmalloc.c +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c @@ -2681,14 +2681,14 @@ void get_vmalloc_info(struct vmalloc_info *vmi) prev_end = VMALLOC_START; - spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock); + rcu_read_lock(); if (list_empty(&vmap_area_list)) { vmi->largest_chunk = VMALLOC_TOTAL; goto out; } - list_for_each_entry(va, &vmap_area_list, list) { + list_for_each_entry_rcu(va, &vmap_area_list, list) { unsigned long addr = va->va_start; /* @@ -2715,7 +2715,7 @@ void get_vmalloc_info(struct vmalloc_info *vmi) vmi->largest_chunk = VMALLOC_END - prev_end; out: - spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock); + rcu_read_unlock(); } #endif |