mm/swapfile: use percpu_ref to serialize against concurrent swapoff

Patch series "close various race windows for swap", v6.

When I was investigating the swap code, I found some possible race
windows.  This series aims to fix all these races.  But using current
get/put_swap_device() to guard against concurrent swapoff for
swap_readpage() looks terrible because swap_readpage() may take really
long time.  And to reduce the performance overhead on the hot-path as much
as possible, it appears we can use the percpu_ref to close this race
window(as suggested by Huang, Ying).  The patch 1 adds percpu_ref support
for swap and most of the remaining patches try to use this to close
various race windows.  More details can be found in the respective
changelogs.

This patch (of 4):

Using current get/put_swap_device() to guard against concurrent swapoff
for some swap ops, e.g.  swap_readpage(), looks terrible because they
might take really long time.  This patch adds the percpu_ref support to
serialize against concurrent swapoff(as suggested by Huang, Ying).  Also
we remove the SWP_VALID flag because it's used together with RCU solution.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210426123316.806267-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210426123316.806267-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 49 insertions, 30 deletions

diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 996afa8131c8..a9a04a5360d9 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/swap_slots.h>
 #include <linux/sort.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 #include <linux/swapops.h>
@@ -511,6 +512,14 @@ static void swap_discard_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	spin_unlock(&si->lock);
 }
 
+static void swap_users_ref_free(struct percpu_ref *ref)
+{
+	struct swap_info_struct *si;
+
+	si = container_of(ref, struct swap_info_struct, users);
+	complete(&si->comp);
+}
+
 static void alloc_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long idx)
 {
 	struct swap_cluster_info *ci = si->cluster_info;
@@ -1270,18 +1279,12 @@ static unsigned char __swap_entry_free_locked(struct swap_info_struct *p,
  * via preventing the swap device from being swapoff, until
  * put_swap_device() is called.  Otherwise return NULL.
  *
- * The entirety of the RCU read critical section must come before the
- * return from or after the call to synchronize_rcu() in
- * enable_swap_info() or swapoff().  So if "si->flags & SWP_VALID" is
- * true, the si->map, si->cluster_info, etc. must be valid in the
- * critical section.
- *
  * Notice that swapoff or swapoff+swapon can still happen before the
- * rcu_read_lock() in get_swap_device() or after the rcu_read_unlock()
- * in put_swap_device() if there isn't any other way to prevent
- * swapoff, such as page lock, page table lock, etc.  The caller must
- * be prepared for that.  For example, the following situation is
- * possible.
+ * percpu_ref_tryget_live() in get_swap_device() or after the
+ * percpu_ref_put() in put_swap_device() if there isn't any other way
+ * to prevent swapoff, such as page lock, page table lock, etc.  The
+ * caller must be prepared for that.  For example, the following
+ * situation is possible.
  *
  *   CPU1				CPU2
  *   do_swap_page()
@@ -1309,21 +1312,27 @@ struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_device(swp_entry_t entry)
 	si = swp_swap_info(entry);
 	if (!si)
 		goto bad_nofile;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	if (data_race(!(si->flags & SWP_VALID)))
-		goto unlock_out;
+	if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&si->users))
+		goto out;
+	/*
+	 * Guarantee the si->users are checked before accessing other
+	 * fields of swap_info_struct.
+	 *
+	 * Paired with the spin_unlock() after setup_swap_info() in
+	 * enable_swap_info().
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
 	offset = swp_offset(entry);
 	if (offset >= si->max)
-		goto unlock_out;
+		goto put_out;
 
 	return si;
 bad_nofile:
 	pr_err("%s: %s%08lx\n", __func__, Bad_file, entry.val);
 out:
 	return NULL;
-unlock_out:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
+put_out:
+	percpu_ref_put(&si->users);
 	return NULL;
 }
 
@@ -2466,7 +2475,7 @@ static void setup_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
 
 static void _enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p)
 {
-	p->flags |= SWP_WRITEOK | SWP_VALID;
+	p->flags |= SWP_WRITEOK;
 	atomic_long_add(p->pages, &nr_swap_pages);
 	total_swap_pages += p->pages;
 
@@ -2497,10 +2506,9 @@ static void enable_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *p, int prio,
 	spin_unlock(&p->lock);
 	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
 	/*
-	 * Guarantee swap_map, cluster_info, etc. fields are valid
-	 * between get/put_swap_device() if SWP_VALID bit is set
+	 * Finished initializing swap device, now it's safe to reference it.
 	 */
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	percpu_ref_resurrect(&p->users);
 	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
 	spin_lock(&p->lock);
 	_enable_swap_info(p);
@@ -2616,16 +2624,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
 
 	reenable_swap_slots_cache_unlock();
 
-	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
-	spin_lock(&p->lock);
-	p->flags &= ~SWP_VALID;		/* mark swap device as invalid */
-	spin_unlock(&p->lock);
-	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
 	/*
-	 * wait for swap operations protected by get/put_swap_device()
-	 * to complete
+	 * Wait for swap operations protected by get/put_swap_device()
+	 * to complete.
+	 *
+	 * We need synchronize_rcu() here to protect the accessing to
+	 * the swap cache data structure.
 	 */
+	percpu_ref_kill(&p->users);
 	synchronize_rcu();
+	wait_for_completion(&p->comp);
 
 	flush_work(&p->discard_work);
 
@@ -2857,6 +2865,12 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
 	if (!p)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
+	if (percpu_ref_init(&p->users, swap_users_ref_free,
+			    PERCPU_REF_INIT_DEAD, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+		kvfree(p);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
 	spin_lock(&swap_lock);
 	for (type = 0; type < nr_swapfiles; type++) {
 		if (!(swap_info[type]->flags & SWP_USED))
@@ -2864,6 +2878,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
 	}
 	if (type >= MAX_SWAPFILES) {
 		spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
+		percpu_ref_exit(&p->users);
 		kvfree(p);
 		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 	}
@@ -2891,9 +2906,13 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *alloc_swap_info(void)
 		plist_node_init(&p->avail_lists[i], 0);
 	p->flags = SWP_USED;
 	spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
-	kvfree(defer);
+	if (defer) {
+		percpu_ref_exit(&defer->users);
+		kvfree(defer);
+	}
 	spin_lock_init(&p->lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&p->cont_lock);
+	init_completion(&p->comp);
 
 	return p;
 }