summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/page_alloc.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>2007-01-05 16:36:30 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org>2007-01-05 23:55:23 -0800
commit9ab37b8f21b4dfe256d736c13738d20c88a1f3ad (patch)
tree11b7b33b1e88ce19175492f25cfc71add2b3dcd6 /mm/page_alloc.c
parentdd0ec16fa6cf2498b831663a543e1b67fce6e155 (diff)
downloadlwn-9ab37b8f21b4dfe256d736c13738d20c88a1f3ad.tar.gz
lwn-9ab37b8f21b4dfe256d736c13738d20c88a1f3ad.zip
[PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages
At the moment the inode/dentry cache hash tables (common by way of alloc_large_system_hash()) are incorrectly sized by their respective detection logic when we attempt to use large base pages on systems with little memory. This results in odd behaviour when using a 64kB PAGE_SIZE, such as: Dentry cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: -1, 32768 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: -2, 16384 bytes) The mount cache hash table is seemingly the only one that gets this right by directly taking PAGE_SIZE in to account. The following patch attempts to catch the bogus values and round it up to at least 0-order. Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/page_alloc.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/page_alloc.c4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 8c1a116875bc..4a9a83fc1b39 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3321,6 +3321,10 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(const char *tablename,
numentries >>= (scale - PAGE_SHIFT);
else
numentries <<= (PAGE_SHIFT - scale);
+
+ /* Make sure we've got at least a 0-order allocation.. */
+ if (unlikely((numentries * bucketsize) < PAGE_SIZE))
+ numentries = PAGE_SIZE / bucketsize;
}
numentries = roundup_pow_of_two(numentries);