diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2015-02-17 13:22:25 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2015-02-18 14:27:30 +0100 |
commit | 3960c8c0c7891dfc0f7be687cbdabb0d6916d614 (patch) | |
tree | cfd3caba8980a19d579a74e57d220d9fe9850732 /kernel | |
parent | 74b8a4cb6ce3685049ee124243a52238c5cabe55 (diff) | |
download | lwn-3960c8c0c7891dfc0f7be687cbdabb0d6916d614.tar.gz lwn-3960c8c0c7891dfc0f7be687cbdabb0d6916d614.zip |
sched: Make dl_task_time() use task_rq_lock()
Kirill reported that a dl task can be throttled and dequeued at the
same time. This happens, when it becomes throttled in schedule(),
which is called to go to sleep:
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule()
deactivate_task()
dequeue_task_dl()
update_curr_dl()
start_dl_timer()
__dequeue_task_dl()
prev->on_rq = 0;
This invalidates the assumption from commit 0f397f2c90ce ("sched/dl:
Fix race in dl_task_timer()"):
"The only reason we don't strictly need ->pi_lock now is because
we're guaranteed to have p->state == TASK_RUNNING here and are
thus free of ttwu races".
And therefore we have to use the full task_rq_lock() here.
This further amends the fact that we forgot to update the rq lock loop
for TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATE, from commit cca26e8009d1 ("sched: Teach
scheduler to understand TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING state").
Reported-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150217123139.GN5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 76 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/deadline.c | 12 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/sched.h | 76 |
3 files changed, 79 insertions, 85 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index fd0a6ed21849..f77acd98f50a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -307,82 +307,6 @@ __read_mostly int scheduler_running; int sysctl_sched_rt_runtime = 950000; /* - * __task_rq_lock - lock the rq @p resides on. - */ -static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p) - __acquires(rq->lock) -{ - struct rq *rq; - - lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); - - for (;;) { - rq = task_rq(p); - raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) - return rq; - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); - - while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) - cpu_relax(); - } -} - -/* - * task_rq_lock - lock p->pi_lock and lock the rq @p resides on. - */ -static struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags) - __acquires(p->pi_lock) - __acquires(rq->lock) -{ - struct rq *rq; - - for (;;) { - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags); - rq = task_rq(p); - raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - /* - * move_queued_task() task_rq_lock() - * - * ACQUIRE (rq->lock) - * [S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING [L] rq = task_rq() - * WMB (__set_task_cpu()) ACQUIRE (rq->lock); - * [S] ->cpu = new_cpu [L] task_rq() - * [L] ->on_rq - * RELEASE (rq->lock) - * - * If we observe the old cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire of - * the old rq->lock will fully serialize against the stores. - * - * If we observe the new cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire will - * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating. - */ - if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) - return rq; - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags); - - while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) - cpu_relax(); - } -} - -static void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq) - __releases(rq->lock) -{ - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); -} - -static inline void -task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags) - __releases(rq->lock) - __releases(p->pi_lock) -{ - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags); -} - -/* * this_rq_lock - lock this runqueue and disable interrupts. */ static struct rq *this_rq_lock(void) diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index a027799ae130..e88847d9fc6a 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -511,16 +511,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) struct sched_dl_entity, dl_timer); struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se); + unsigned long flags; struct rq *rq; -again: - rq = task_rq(p); - raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); - if (rq != task_rq(p)) { - /* Task was moved, retrying. */ - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); - goto again; - } + rq = task_rq_lock(current, &flags); /* * We need to take care of several possible races here: @@ -555,7 +549,7 @@ again: push_dl_task(rq); #endif unlock: - raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + task_rq_unlock(rq, current, &flags); return HRTIMER_NORESTART; } diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 0870db23d79c..dc0f435a2779 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -1380,6 +1380,82 @@ static inline void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq) { } extern void start_bandwidth_timer(struct hrtimer *period_timer, ktime_t period); +/* + * __task_rq_lock - lock the rq @p resides on. + */ +static inline struct rq *__task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p) + __acquires(rq->lock) +{ + struct rq *rq; + + lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); + + for (;;) { + rq = task_rq(p); + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + return rq; + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + + while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + cpu_relax(); + } +} + +/* + * task_rq_lock - lock p->pi_lock and lock the rq @p resides on. + */ +static inline struct rq *task_rq_lock(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags) + __acquires(p->pi_lock) + __acquires(rq->lock) +{ + struct rq *rq; + + for (;;) { + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, *flags); + rq = task_rq(p); + raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + /* + * move_queued_task() task_rq_lock() + * + * ACQUIRE (rq->lock) + * [S] ->on_rq = MIGRATING [L] rq = task_rq() + * WMB (__set_task_cpu()) ACQUIRE (rq->lock); + * [S] ->cpu = new_cpu [L] task_rq() + * [L] ->on_rq + * RELEASE (rq->lock) + * + * If we observe the old cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire of + * the old rq->lock will fully serialize against the stores. + * + * If we observe the new cpu in task_rq_lock, the acquire will + * pair with the WMB to ensure we must then also see migrating. + */ + if (likely(rq == task_rq(p) && !task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + return rq; + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags); + + while (unlikely(task_on_rq_migrating(p))) + cpu_relax(); + } +} + +static inline void __task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq) + __releases(rq->lock) +{ + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); +} + +static inline void +task_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, unsigned long *flags) + __releases(rq->lock) + __releases(p->pi_lock) +{ + raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, *flags); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_SMP #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT |