diff options
author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2015-11-29 16:59:35 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2015-12-02 23:36:00 -0500 |
commit | 01b3f52157ff5a47d6d8d796f396a4b34a53c61d (patch) | |
tree | c20181b1b6da1127b53b329085562a9ea2993ca4 /kernel | |
parent | a64f3f83505f4ed6662fd9dda998d4890aba58bd (diff) | |
download | lwn-01b3f52157ff5a47d6d8d796f396a4b34a53c61d.tar.gz lwn-01b3f52157ff5a47d6d8d796f396a4b34a53c61d.zip |
bpf: fix allocation warnings in bpf maps and integer overflow
For large map->value_size the user space can trigger memory allocation warnings like:
WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 11122 at mm/page_alloc.c:2989
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x695/0x14e0()
Call Trace:
[< inline >] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15
[<ffffffff82743b56>] dump_stack+0x68/0x92 lib/dump_stack.c:50
[<ffffffff81244ec9>] warn_slowpath_common+0xd9/0x140 kernel/panic.c:460
[<ffffffff812450f9>] warn_slowpath_null+0x29/0x30 kernel/panic.c:493
[< inline >] __alloc_pages_slowpath mm/page_alloc.c:2989
[<ffffffff81554e95>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x695/0x14e0 mm/page_alloc.c:3235
[<ffffffff816188fe>] alloc_pages_current+0xee/0x340 mm/mempolicy.c:2055
[< inline >] alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:451
[<ffffffff81550706>] alloc_kmem_pages+0x16/0xf0 mm/page_alloc.c:3414
[<ffffffff815a1c89>] kmalloc_order+0x19/0x60 mm/slab_common.c:1007
[<ffffffff815a1cef>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x1f/0xa0 mm/slab_common.c:1018
[< inline >] kmalloc_large include/linux/slab.h:390
[<ffffffff81627784>] __kmalloc+0x234/0x250 mm/slub.c:3525
[< inline >] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:463
[< inline >] map_update_elem kernel/bpf/syscall.c:288
[< inline >] SYSC_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:744
To avoid never succeeding kmalloc with order >= MAX_ORDER check that
elem->value_size and computed elem_size are within limits for both hash and
array type maps.
Also add __GFP_NOWARN to kmalloc(value_size | elem_size) to avoid OOM warnings.
Note kmalloc(key_size) is highly unlikely to trigger OOM, since key_size <= 512,
so keep those kmalloc-s as-is.
Large value_size can cause integer overflows in elem_size and map.pages
formulas, so check for that as well.
Fixes: aaac3ba95e4c ("bpf: charge user for creation of BPF maps and programs")
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 34 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 |
3 files changed, 34 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c index 4c67ce39732e..b0799bced518 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c @@ -28,11 +28,17 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) attr->value_size == 0) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + if (attr->value_size >= 1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1)) + /* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to + * access the elements. + */ + return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG); + elem_size = round_up(attr->value_size, 8); /* check round_up into zero and u32 overflow */ if (elem_size == 0 || - attr->max_entries > (U32_MAX - sizeof(*array)) / elem_size) + attr->max_entries > (U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(*array)) / elem_size) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); array_size = sizeof(*array) + attr->max_entries * elem_size; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c index 19909b22b4f8..34777b3746fa 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c @@ -64,12 +64,35 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) */ goto free_htab; - err = -ENOMEM; + if (htab->map.value_size >= (1 << (KMALLOC_SHIFT_MAX - 1)) - + MAX_BPF_STACK - sizeof(struct htab_elem)) + /* if value_size is bigger, the user space won't be able to + * access the elements via bpf syscall. This check also makes + * sure that the elem_size doesn't overflow and it's + * kmalloc-able later in htab_map_update_elem() + */ + goto free_htab; + + htab->elem_size = sizeof(struct htab_elem) + + round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8) + + htab->map.value_size; + /* prevent zero size kmalloc and check for u32 overflow */ if (htab->n_buckets == 0 || htab->n_buckets > U32_MAX / sizeof(struct hlist_head)) goto free_htab; + if ((u64) htab->n_buckets * sizeof(struct hlist_head) + + (u64) htab->elem_size * htab->map.max_entries >= + U32_MAX - PAGE_SIZE) + /* make sure page count doesn't overflow */ + goto free_htab; + + htab->map.pages = round_up(htab->n_buckets * sizeof(struct hlist_head) + + htab->elem_size * htab->map.max_entries, + PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + + err = -ENOMEM; htab->buckets = kmalloc_array(htab->n_buckets, sizeof(struct hlist_head), GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN); @@ -85,13 +108,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) raw_spin_lock_init(&htab->lock); htab->count = 0; - htab->elem_size = sizeof(struct htab_elem) + - round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8) + - htab->map.value_size; - - htab->map.pages = round_up(htab->n_buckets * sizeof(struct hlist_head) + - htab->elem_size * htab->map.max_entries, - PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT; return &htab->map; free_htab: @@ -222,7 +238,7 @@ static int htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value, WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()); /* allocate new element outside of lock */ - l_new = kmalloc(htab->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC); + l_new = kmalloc(htab->elem_size, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN); if (!l_new) return -ENOMEM; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 4a8f3c1d7da6..3b39550d8485 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr) goto free_key; err = -ENOMEM; - value = kmalloc(map->value_size, GFP_USER); + value = kmalloc(map->value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN); if (!value) goto free_key; @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int map_update_elem(union bpf_attr *attr) goto free_key; err = -ENOMEM; - value = kmalloc(map->value_size, GFP_USER); + value = kmalloc(map->value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN); if (!value) goto free_key; |