diff options
author | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2020-03-21 12:25:58 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2020-03-21 16:00:23 +0100 |
commit | e5d4d1756b07d9490a0269a9e68c1e05ee1feb9b (patch) | |
tree | 27a6cf91053169846adab85b04a84cb9e763d2fb /kernel/time/tick-sched.c | |
parent | 919e9e6395cfac23b7e71ed88930367459055daf (diff) | |
download | lwn-e5d4d1756b07d9490a0269a9e68c1e05ee1feb9b.tar.gz lwn-e5d4d1756b07d9490a0269a9e68c1e05ee1feb9b.zip |
timekeeping: Split jiffies seqlock
seqlock consists of a sequence counter and a spinlock_t which is used to
serialize the writers. spinlock_t is substituted by a "sleeping" spinlock
on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels which breaks the usage in the timekeeping
code as the writers are executed in hard interrupt and therefore
non-preemptible context even on PREEMPT_RT.
The spinlock in seqlock cannot be unconditionally replaced by a
raw_spinlock_t as many seqlock users have nesting spinlock sections or
other code which is not suitable to run in truly atomic context on RT.
Instead of providing a raw_seqlock API for a single use case, open code the
seqlock for the jiffies use case and implement it with a raw_spinlock_t and
a sequence counter.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.120587764@linutronix.de
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time/tick-sched.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index a792d21cac64..4be756b88a48 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_t now) return; /* Reevaluate with jiffies_lock held */ - write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock); + raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); delta = ktime_sub(now, last_jiffies_update); if (delta >= tick_period) { @@ -91,10 +92,12 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(ktime_t now) /* Keep the tick_next_period variable up to date */ tick_next_period = ktime_add(last_jiffies_update, tick_period); } else { - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); return; } - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); update_wall_time(); } @@ -105,12 +108,14 @@ static ktime_t tick_init_jiffy_update(void) { ktime_t period; - write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock); + raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); /* Did we start the jiffies update yet ? */ if (last_jiffies_update == 0) last_jiffies_update = tick_next_period; period = last_jiffies_update; - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); return period; } @@ -676,10 +681,10 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu) /* Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last */ do { - seq = read_seqbegin(&jiffies_lock); + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); basemono = last_jiffies_update; basejiff = jiffies; - } while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq)); + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq)); ts->last_jiffies = basejiff; ts->timer_expires_base = basemono; |