diff options
author | Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> | 2012-01-30 17:02:47 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2012-02-21 09:06:07 -0800 |
commit | 2036d94a7b61ca5032ce90f2bda06afec0fe713e (patch) | |
tree | fc9f4b5ba1058e5a2fdf9ccd187766c90f5ae036 /kernel/rcutree.c | |
parent | c5fdcec927ee31fc96e92339c3a83ac6e0725289 (diff) | |
download | lwn-2036d94a7b61ca5032ce90f2bda06afec0fe713e.tar.gz lwn-2036d94a7b61ca5032ce90f2bda06afec0fe713e.zip |
rcu: Rework detection of use of RCU by offline CPUs
Because newly offlined CPUs continue executing after completing the
CPU_DYING notifiers, they legitimately enter the scheduler and use
RCU while appearing to be offline. This calls for a more sophisticated
approach as follows:
1. RCU marks the CPU online during the CPU_UP_PREPARE phase.
2. RCU marks the CPU offline during the CPU_DEAD phase.
3. Diagnostics regarding use of read-side RCU by offline CPUs use
RCU's accounting rather than the cpu_online_map. (Note that
__call_rcu() still uses cpu_online_map to detect illegal
invocations within CPU_DYING notifiers.)
4. Offline CPUs are prevented from hanging the system by
force_quiescent_state(), which pays attention to cpu_online_map.
Some additional work (in a later commit) will be needed to
guarantee that force_quiescent_state() waits a full jiffy before
assuming that a CPU is offline, for example, when called from
idle entry. (This commit also makes the one-jiffy wait
explicit, since the old-style implicit wait can now be defeated
by RCU_FAST_NO_HZ and by rcutorture.)
This approach avoids the false positives encountered when attempting to
use more exact classification of CPU online/offline state.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/rcutree.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcutree.c | 113 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index 05470d4caba3..708469a06860 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -320,25 +320,18 @@ static struct rcu_node *rcu_get_root(struct rcu_state *rsp) static int rcu_implicit_offline_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp) { /* - * If the CPU is offline, it is in a quiescent state. We can - * trust its state not to change because interrupts are disabled. + * If the CPU is offline for more than a jiffy, it is in a quiescent + * state. We can trust its state not to change because interrupts + * are disabled. The reason for the jiffy's worth of slack is to + * handle CPUs initializing on the way up and finding their way + * to the idle loop on the way down. */ - if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu)) { + if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) && + ULONG_CMP_LT(rdp->rsp->gp_start + 2, jiffies)) { trace_rcu_fqs(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, rdp->cpu, "ofl"); rdp->offline_fqs++; return 1; } - - /* - * The CPU is online, so send it a reschedule IPI. This forces - * it through the scheduler, and (inefficiently) also handles cases - * where idle loops fail to inform RCU about the CPU being idle. - */ - if (rdp->cpu != smp_processor_id()) - smp_send_reschedule(rdp->cpu); - else - set_need_resched(); - rdp->resched_ipi++; return 0; } @@ -601,19 +594,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rcu_is_cpu_idle); * this task being preempted, its old CPU being taken offline, resuming * on some other CPU, then determining that its old CPU is now offline. * It is OK to use RCU on an offline processor during initial boot, hence - * the check for rcu_scheduler_fully_active. + * the check for rcu_scheduler_fully_active. Note also that it is OK + * for a CPU coming online to use RCU for one jiffy prior to marking itself + * online in the cpu_online_mask. Similarly, it is OK for a CPU going + * offline to continue to use RCU for one jiffy after marking itself + * offline in the cpu_online_mask. This leniency is necessary given the + * non-atomic nature of the online and offline processing, for example, + * the fact that a CPU enters the scheduler after completing the CPU_DYING + * notifiers. + * + * This is also why RCU internally marks CPUs online during the + * CPU_UP_PREPARE phase and offline during the CPU_DEAD phase. * * Disable checking if in an NMI handler because we cannot safely report * errors from NMI handlers anyway. */ bool rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online(void) { + struct rcu_data *rdp; + struct rcu_node *rnp; bool ret; if (in_nmi()) return 1; preempt_disable(); - ret = cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) || + rdp = &__get_cpu_var(rcu_sched_data); + rnp = rdp->mynode; + ret = (rdp->grpmask & rnp->qsmaskinit) || !rcu_scheduler_fully_active; preempt_enable(); return ret; @@ -1308,14 +1315,12 @@ rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) */ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) { - unsigned long flags; int i; unsigned long mask; - int need_report; int receive_cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask); struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda); struct rcu_data *receive_rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, receive_cpu); - struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* For dying CPU. */ + RCU_TRACE(struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode); /* For dying CPU. */ /* First, adjust the counts. */ if (rdp->nxtlist != NULL) { @@ -1381,32 +1386,6 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) "cpuofl"); rcu_report_qs_rdp(smp_processor_id(), rsp, rdp, rsp->gpnum); /* Note that rcu_report_qs_rdp() might call trace_rcu_grace_period(). */ - - /* - * Remove the dying CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node - * hierarchy. Because we are in stop_machine() context, we - * automatically exclude ->onofflock critical sections. - */ - do { - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags); - rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask; - if (rnp->qsmaskinit != 0) { - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); - break; - } - if (rnp == rdp->mynode) { - need_report = rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp); - if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_NORM_GP) - rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags); - else - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); - if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_EXP_GP) - rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, true); - } else - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); - mask = rnp->grpmask; - rnp = rnp->parent; - } while (rnp != NULL); } /* @@ -1417,11 +1396,53 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_cpu(struct rcu_state *rsp) */ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp) { + unsigned long flags; + unsigned long mask; + int need_report = 0; struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu); - struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; + struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* Outgoing CPU's rnp. */ + /* Adjust any no-longer-needed kthreads. */ rcu_stop_cpu_kthread(cpu); rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1); + + /* Remove the dying CPU from the bitmasks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ + + /* Exclude any attempts to start a new grace period. */ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); + + /* Remove the outgoing CPU from the masks in the rcu_node hierarchy. */ + mask = rdp->grpmask; /* rnp->grplo is constant. */ + do { + raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */ + rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask; + if (rnp->qsmaskinit != 0) { + if (rnp != rdp->mynode) + raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ + break; + } + if (rnp == rdp->mynode) + need_report = rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(rsp, rnp, rdp); + else + raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ + mask = rnp->grpmask; + rnp = rnp->parent; + } while (rnp != NULL); + + /* + * We still hold the leaf rcu_node structure lock here, and + * irqs are still disabled. The reason for this subterfuge is + * because invoking rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() with ->onofflock + * held leads to deadlock. + */ + raw_spin_unlock(&rsp->onofflock); /* irqs remain disabled. */ + rnp = rdp->mynode; + if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_NORM_GP) + rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags); + else + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags); + if (need_report & RCU_OFL_TASKS_EXP_GP) + rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, true); } #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */ |